Still More on Why We Should Bury the Marginal Productivity Theory of the Price of Capital: a Supplementary Note

Roy Grieve

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

Abstract

The purpose of this note is to supplement the author’s earlier remarks on the unsatisfactory nature of the neoclassical account of how the return on capital is determined. (See Strathclyde Discussion Paper 12-03: “The Marginal Productivity Theory of the Price of Capital: An Historical Perspective on the Origins of the Codswallop”). The point is made via a simple illustration that certain matters which are problematical in neoclassical terms are perfectly straightforward when viewed from a classical perspective. Basically, the marginalist model of the nature of an economic system is not fit for purpose in that it fails to comprehend the essential features of a surplusproducing economic system as distinct from one merely of exchange.
LanguageEnglish
Place of PublicationGlasgow
PublisherUniversity of Strathclyde
Pages1-11
Number of pages12
Volume12
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Productivity
Economic systems
Historical perspective

Keywords

  • marginal productivity theory of distribution
  • reswitching

Cite this

Grieve, R. (2012). Still More on Why We Should Bury the Marginal Productivity Theory of the Price of Capital: a Supplementary Note. (15 ed.) (pp. 1-11). Glasgow: University of Strathclyde.
Grieve, Roy. / Still More on Why We Should Bury the Marginal Productivity Theory of the Price of Capital : a Supplementary Note. 15. ed. Glasgow : University of Strathclyde, 2012. pp. 1-11
@techreport{f927ef8dd3ad4070a3ce47e16a2ac026,
title = "Still More on Why We Should Bury the Marginal Productivity Theory of the Price of Capital: a Supplementary Note",
abstract = "The purpose of this note is to supplement the author’s earlier remarks on the unsatisfactory nature of the neoclassical account of how the return on capital is determined. (See Strathclyde Discussion Paper 12-03: “The Marginal Productivity Theory of the Price of Capital: An Historical Perspective on the Origins of the Codswallop”). The point is made via a simple illustration that certain matters which are problematical in neoclassical terms are perfectly straightforward when viewed from a classical perspective. Basically, the marginalist model of the nature of an economic system is not fit for purpose in that it fails to comprehend the essential features of a surplusproducing economic system as distinct from one merely of exchange.",
keywords = "marginal productivity theory of distribution, reswitching",
author = "Roy Grieve",
note = "Published as a paper within the Discussion Papers in Economics, No. 12-15 (2012)",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "1--11",
publisher = "University of Strathclyde",
edition = "15",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "University of Strathclyde",

}

Still More on Why We Should Bury the Marginal Productivity Theory of the Price of Capital : a Supplementary Note. / Grieve, Roy.

15. ed. Glasgow : University of Strathclyde, 2012. p. 1-11.

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

TY - UNPB

T1 - Still More on Why We Should Bury the Marginal Productivity Theory of the Price of Capital

T2 - a Supplementary Note

AU - Grieve, Roy

N1 - Published as a paper within the Discussion Papers in Economics, No. 12-15 (2012)

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - The purpose of this note is to supplement the author’s earlier remarks on the unsatisfactory nature of the neoclassical account of how the return on capital is determined. (See Strathclyde Discussion Paper 12-03: “The Marginal Productivity Theory of the Price of Capital: An Historical Perspective on the Origins of the Codswallop”). The point is made via a simple illustration that certain matters which are problematical in neoclassical terms are perfectly straightforward when viewed from a classical perspective. Basically, the marginalist model of the nature of an economic system is not fit for purpose in that it fails to comprehend the essential features of a surplusproducing economic system as distinct from one merely of exchange.

AB - The purpose of this note is to supplement the author’s earlier remarks on the unsatisfactory nature of the neoclassical account of how the return on capital is determined. (See Strathclyde Discussion Paper 12-03: “The Marginal Productivity Theory of the Price of Capital: An Historical Perspective on the Origins of the Codswallop”). The point is made via a simple illustration that certain matters which are problematical in neoclassical terms are perfectly straightforward when viewed from a classical perspective. Basically, the marginalist model of the nature of an economic system is not fit for purpose in that it fails to comprehend the essential features of a surplusproducing economic system as distinct from one merely of exchange.

KW - marginal productivity theory of distribution

KW - reswitching

M3 - Discussion paper

VL - 12

SP - 1

EP - 11

BT - Still More on Why We Should Bury the Marginal Productivity Theory of the Price of Capital

PB - University of Strathclyde

CY - Glasgow

ER -