Steady-state performance of state-of-the-art modular multilevel and alternate arm converters with DC fault-blocking capability

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper presents a comparison of the steady-state behaviour of four state-of-the-art HVDC converters with DC fault-blocking capability, based on the modular multilevel and alternate arm converter topologies. AC and DC power quality, and semiconductor losses are compared, whilst considering different operating conditions and design parameters, such as the number of cells and component sizing. Such comparative studies have been performed using high-fidelity converter models which include detailed representation of the control systems, and of the converter thermal circuit. The main findings of this comprehensive comparison reveal that, the mixed cell modular converter offers the best design trade-off in terms of power losses and quality, and control range. Moreover, it has been established that the modular converter with a reduced number of cells per arm and with each cell rated at high voltage (i.e. 10-20 kV), tends to exhibit higher switching losses and relatively poor power quality at the DC side.
LanguageEnglish
Pages618–629
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems
Volume99
Early online date20 Feb 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Jul 2018

Fingerprint

Power quality
Topology
Semiconductor materials
Control systems
Networks (circuits)
Electric potential
Hot Temperature

Keywords

  • HVDC
  • power losses
  • power quality
  • converter modelling

Cite this

@article{8c29de67a7f84564ad49f46ac79c93d3,
title = "Steady-state performance of state-of-the-art modular multilevel and alternate arm converters with DC fault-blocking capability",
abstract = "This paper presents a comparison of the steady-state behaviour of four state-of-the-art HVDC converters with DC fault-blocking capability, based on the modular multilevel and alternate arm converter topologies. AC and DC power quality, and semiconductor losses are compared, whilst considering different operating conditions and design parameters, such as the number of cells and component sizing. Such comparative studies have been performed using high-fidelity converter models which include detailed representation of the control systems, and of the converter thermal circuit. The main findings of this comprehensive comparison reveal that, the mixed cell modular converter offers the best design trade-off in terms of power losses and quality, and control range. Moreover, it has been established that the modular converter with a reduced number of cells per arm and with each cell rated at high voltage (i.e. 10-20 kV), tends to exhibit higher switching losses and relatively poor power quality at the DC side.",
keywords = "HVDC, power losses, power quality, converter modelling",
author = "D. Vozikis and G.P. Adam and P. Rault and D. Tzelepis and D. Holliday and S. Finney",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijepes.2018.01.054",
language = "English",
volume = "99",
pages = "618–629",
journal = "Electrical Power and Energy Systems",
issn = "0142-0615",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Steady-state performance of state-of-the-art modular multilevel and alternate arm converters with DC fault-blocking capability

AU - Vozikis, D.

AU - Adam, G.P.

AU - Rault, P.

AU - Tzelepis, D.

AU - Holliday, D.

AU - Finney, S.

PY - 2018/7/31

Y1 - 2018/7/31

N2 - This paper presents a comparison of the steady-state behaviour of four state-of-the-art HVDC converters with DC fault-blocking capability, based on the modular multilevel and alternate arm converter topologies. AC and DC power quality, and semiconductor losses are compared, whilst considering different operating conditions and design parameters, such as the number of cells and component sizing. Such comparative studies have been performed using high-fidelity converter models which include detailed representation of the control systems, and of the converter thermal circuit. The main findings of this comprehensive comparison reveal that, the mixed cell modular converter offers the best design trade-off in terms of power losses and quality, and control range. Moreover, it has been established that the modular converter with a reduced number of cells per arm and with each cell rated at high voltage (i.e. 10-20 kV), tends to exhibit higher switching losses and relatively poor power quality at the DC side.

AB - This paper presents a comparison of the steady-state behaviour of four state-of-the-art HVDC converters with DC fault-blocking capability, based on the modular multilevel and alternate arm converter topologies. AC and DC power quality, and semiconductor losses are compared, whilst considering different operating conditions and design parameters, such as the number of cells and component sizing. Such comparative studies have been performed using high-fidelity converter models which include detailed representation of the control systems, and of the converter thermal circuit. The main findings of this comprehensive comparison reveal that, the mixed cell modular converter offers the best design trade-off in terms of power losses and quality, and control range. Moreover, it has been established that the modular converter with a reduced number of cells per arm and with each cell rated at high voltage (i.e. 10-20 kV), tends to exhibit higher switching losses and relatively poor power quality at the DC side.

KW - HVDC

KW - power losses

KW - power quality

KW - converter modelling

UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142061517312024

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijepes.2018.01.054

DO - 10.1016/j.ijepes.2018.01.054

M3 - Article

VL - 99

SP - 618

EP - 629

JO - Electrical Power and Energy Systems

T2 - Electrical Power and Energy Systems

JF - Electrical Power and Energy Systems

SN - 0142-0615

ER -