Projects per year
Abstract
There is a theoretical and empirical need to distinguish between static support for the EU as it now is and dynamic support for further integration. Although most Europeans endorse the EU as a good thing today, the European Election Study finds no popular majority for an ever closer union, the commitment of EU institutions. Less than one-third endorses further integration and less than one-third thinks integration has gone too far. The largest group favours keeping the EU as it is. Their outlook reflects ambivalence; they see the EU as having both strengths and weaknesses. It does not reflect lack of EU knowledge or of socio-economic resources, as is the case with ‘don't knows’. While eurozone institutions are committed to further integration, most EU citizens are not. Likewise, there is no majority supporting eurosceptic demands for returning powers to national governments.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 370-387 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies |
Volume | 54 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 3 Aug 2015 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 31 Mar 2016 |
Keywords
- European integration
- dynamic opinions
- status-quo
- ambivalence
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Static and dynamic views of European integration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
Projects
- 1 Finished
-
Representing Europeans: The 2009 European Parliament Election In Theory And Practice
Rose, R. (Principal Investigator)
ESRC (Economic and Social Research Council)
8/03/12 → 7/12/12
Project: Research