STAR—people-powered prioritization: a 21st-century solution to allocation headaches

Mara Airoldi, Alec Morton, Jenifer Smith, Gwyn Bevan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of cost effectiveness analysis (CEA) is to inform the allocation of scarce resources. CEA is routinely used in assessing the cost-effectiveness of specific health technologies by agencies such as the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) in England and Wales. But there is extensive evidence that because of barriers of accessibility and acceptability, CEA has not been used by local health planners in their annual task of allocating fixed budgets to a wide range of types of health care. This paper argues that these planners can use Socio Technical Allocation of Resources (STAR) for that task. STAR builds on the principles of CEA and the practice of program budgeting and marginal analysis. STAR uses requisite models to assess the cost-effectiveness of all interventions considered for resource reallocation by explicitly applying the theory of health economics to evidence of scale, costs, and benefits, with deliberation facilitated through an interactive social process of engaging key stakeholders. In that social process, the stakeholders generate missing estimates of scale, costs, and benefits of the interventions; develop visual models of their relative cost-effectiveness; and interpret the results. We demonstrate the feasibility of STAR by showing how it was used by a local health planning agency of the English National Health Service, the Isle of Wight Primary Care Trust, to allocate a fixed budget in 2008 and 2009.
LanguageEnglish
Pages965-975
Number of pages11
JournalMedical Decision Making
Volume34
Issue number8
Early online date12 Aug 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2014

Fingerprint

Resource Allocation
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Headache
Budgets
Health Planning
Biomedical Technology
Wales
Health
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
National Health Programs
England
Primary Health Care
Economics
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • priority setting
  • resource allocation
  • decision aid
  • cost effectiveness analysis

Cite this

Airoldi, Mara ; Morton, Alec ; Smith, Jenifer ; Bevan, Gwyn. / STAR—people-powered prioritization : a 21st-century solution to allocation headaches. In: Medical Decision Making. 2014 ; Vol. 34, No. 8. pp. 965-975.
@article{e3bd61fe163547a28ebc7d7b3bb63152,
title = "STAR—people-powered prioritization: a 21st-century solution to allocation headaches",
abstract = "The aim of cost effectiveness analysis (CEA) is to inform the allocation of scarce resources. CEA is routinely used in assessing the cost-effectiveness of specific health technologies by agencies such as the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) in England and Wales. But there is extensive evidence that because of barriers of accessibility and acceptability, CEA has not been used by local health planners in their annual task of allocating fixed budgets to a wide range of types of health care. This paper argues that these planners can use Socio Technical Allocation of Resources (STAR) for that task. STAR builds on the principles of CEA and the practice of program budgeting and marginal analysis. STAR uses requisite models to assess the cost-effectiveness of all interventions considered for resource reallocation by explicitly applying the theory of health economics to evidence of scale, costs, and benefits, with deliberation facilitated through an interactive social process of engaging key stakeholders. In that social process, the stakeholders generate missing estimates of scale, costs, and benefits of the interventions; develop visual models of their relative cost-effectiveness; and interpret the results. We demonstrate the feasibility of STAR by showing how it was used by a local health planning agency of the English National Health Service, the Isle of Wight Primary Care Trust, to allocate a fixed budget in 2008 and 2009.",
keywords = "priority setting, resource allocation, decision aid, cost effectiveness analysis",
author = "Mara Airoldi and Alec Morton and Jenifer Smith and Gwyn Bevan",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0272989X14546376",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "965--975",
journal = "Medical Decision Making",
issn = "0272-989X",
number = "8",

}

STAR—people-powered prioritization : a 21st-century solution to allocation headaches. / Airoldi, Mara; Morton, Alec; Smith, Jenifer; Bevan, Gwyn.

In: Medical Decision Making, Vol. 34, No. 8, 01.11.2014, p. 965-975.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - STAR—people-powered prioritization

T2 - Medical Decision Making

AU - Airoldi, Mara

AU - Morton, Alec

AU - Smith, Jenifer

AU - Bevan, Gwyn

PY - 2014/11/1

Y1 - 2014/11/1

N2 - The aim of cost effectiveness analysis (CEA) is to inform the allocation of scarce resources. CEA is routinely used in assessing the cost-effectiveness of specific health technologies by agencies such as the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) in England and Wales. But there is extensive evidence that because of barriers of accessibility and acceptability, CEA has not been used by local health planners in their annual task of allocating fixed budgets to a wide range of types of health care. This paper argues that these planners can use Socio Technical Allocation of Resources (STAR) for that task. STAR builds on the principles of CEA and the practice of program budgeting and marginal analysis. STAR uses requisite models to assess the cost-effectiveness of all interventions considered for resource reallocation by explicitly applying the theory of health economics to evidence of scale, costs, and benefits, with deliberation facilitated through an interactive social process of engaging key stakeholders. In that social process, the stakeholders generate missing estimates of scale, costs, and benefits of the interventions; develop visual models of their relative cost-effectiveness; and interpret the results. We demonstrate the feasibility of STAR by showing how it was used by a local health planning agency of the English National Health Service, the Isle of Wight Primary Care Trust, to allocate a fixed budget in 2008 and 2009.

AB - The aim of cost effectiveness analysis (CEA) is to inform the allocation of scarce resources. CEA is routinely used in assessing the cost-effectiveness of specific health technologies by agencies such as the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) in England and Wales. But there is extensive evidence that because of barriers of accessibility and acceptability, CEA has not been used by local health planners in their annual task of allocating fixed budgets to a wide range of types of health care. This paper argues that these planners can use Socio Technical Allocation of Resources (STAR) for that task. STAR builds on the principles of CEA and the practice of program budgeting and marginal analysis. STAR uses requisite models to assess the cost-effectiveness of all interventions considered for resource reallocation by explicitly applying the theory of health economics to evidence of scale, costs, and benefits, with deliberation facilitated through an interactive social process of engaging key stakeholders. In that social process, the stakeholders generate missing estimates of scale, costs, and benefits of the interventions; develop visual models of their relative cost-effectiveness; and interpret the results. We demonstrate the feasibility of STAR by showing how it was used by a local health planning agency of the English National Health Service, the Isle of Wight Primary Care Trust, to allocate a fixed budget in 2008 and 2009.

KW - priority setting

KW - resource allocation

KW - decision aid

KW - cost effectiveness analysis

U2 - 10.1177/0272989X14546376

DO - 10.1177/0272989X14546376

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 965

EP - 975

JO - Medical Decision Making

JF - Medical Decision Making

SN - 0272-989X

IS - 8

ER -