Spring plankton dynamics in the Eastern Bering Sea, 1971-2050: mechanisms of interannual variability diagnosed with a numerical model

Neil S. Banas, Jinlun Zhang, Robert G. Campbell, Raymond N. Sambrotto, Michael W. Lomas, Evelyn Sherr, Barry Sherr, Carin Ashjian, Diane Stoecker, Evelyn J. Lessard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A new planktonic ecosystem model was constructed for the Eastern Bering Sea based on observations from the 2007-2010 BEST/BSIERP (Bering Ecosystem Study/Bering Sea Integrated Ecosystem Research Program) field program. When run with forcing from a data-assimilative ice-ocean hindcast of 1971-2012, the model performs well against observations of spring bloom time evolution (phytoplankton and microzooplankton biomass, growth and grazing rates, and ratios among new, regenerated, and export production). On the southern middle shelf (57°N, station M2), the model replicates the generally inverse relationship between ice-retreat timing and spring bloom timing known from observations, and the simpler direct relationship between the two that has been observed on the northern middle shelf (62°N, station M8). The relationship between simulated mean primary production and mean temperature in spring (15 February to 15 July) is generally positive, although this was found to be an indirect relationship which does not continue to apply across a future projection of temperature and ice cover in the 2040s. At M2, the leading direct controls on total spring primary production are found to be advective and turbulent nutrient supply, suggesting that mesoscale, wind-driven processes - A dvective transport and storminess - may be crucial to long-term trends in spring primary production in the southeastern Bering Sea, with temperature and ice cover playing only indirect roles. Sensitivity experiments suggest that direct dependence of planktonic growth and metabolic rates on temperature is less significant overall than the other drivers correlated with temperature described above.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1476-1501
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
Volume121
Issue number2
Early online date20 Feb 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Mar 2016

Fingerprint

Bering Sea
plankton
Plankton
Ice
Numerical models
ice
ecosystems
Ecosystem
Ecosystems
primary production
primary productivity
temperature
ice cover
shelves
Timing
algal bloom
Temperature
stations
time measurement
Cover

Keywords

  • Bering Sea
  • climate change
  • ecosystem model
  • microzooplankton
  • phenology
  • phytoplankton bloom

Cite this

Banas, Neil S. ; Zhang, Jinlun ; Campbell, Robert G. ; Sambrotto, Raymond N. ; Lomas, Michael W. ; Sherr, Evelyn ; Sherr, Barry ; Ashjian, Carin ; Stoecker, Diane ; Lessard, Evelyn J. / Spring plankton dynamics in the Eastern Bering Sea, 1971-2050 : mechanisms of interannual variability diagnosed with a numerical model. In: Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. 2016 ; Vol. 121, No. 2. pp. 1476-1501.
@article{814c403d19ff4fee9179a29ce7450bf2,
title = "Spring plankton dynamics in the Eastern Bering Sea, 1971-2050: mechanisms of interannual variability diagnosed with a numerical model",
abstract = "A new planktonic ecosystem model was constructed for the Eastern Bering Sea based on observations from the 2007-2010 BEST/BSIERP (Bering Ecosystem Study/Bering Sea Integrated Ecosystem Research Program) field program. When run with forcing from a data-assimilative ice-ocean hindcast of 1971-2012, the model performs well against observations of spring bloom time evolution (phytoplankton and microzooplankton biomass, growth and grazing rates, and ratios among new, regenerated, and export production). On the southern middle shelf (57°N, station M2), the model replicates the generally inverse relationship between ice-retreat timing and spring bloom timing known from observations, and the simpler direct relationship between the two that has been observed on the northern middle shelf (62°N, station M8). The relationship between simulated mean primary production and mean temperature in spring (15 February to 15 July) is generally positive, although this was found to be an indirect relationship which does not continue to apply across a future projection of temperature and ice cover in the 2040s. At M2, the leading direct controls on total spring primary production are found to be advective and turbulent nutrient supply, suggesting that mesoscale, wind-driven processes - A dvective transport and storminess - may be crucial to long-term trends in spring primary production in the southeastern Bering Sea, with temperature and ice cover playing only indirect roles. Sensitivity experiments suggest that direct dependence of planktonic growth and metabolic rates on temperature is less significant overall than the other drivers correlated with temperature described above.",
keywords = "Bering Sea, climate change, ecosystem model, microzooplankton, phenology, phytoplankton bloom",
author = "Banas, {Neil S.} and Jinlun Zhang and Campbell, {Robert G.} and Sambrotto, {Raymond N.} and Lomas, {Michael W.} and Evelyn Sherr and Barry Sherr and Carin Ashjian and Diane Stoecker and Lessard, {Evelyn J.}",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1002/2015JC011449",
language = "English",
volume = "121",
pages = "1476--1501",
journal = "Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans",
issn = "0148-0227",
number = "2",

}

Banas, NS, Zhang, J, Campbell, RG, Sambrotto, RN, Lomas, MW, Sherr, E, Sherr, B, Ashjian, C, Stoecker, D & Lessard, EJ 2016, 'Spring plankton dynamics in the Eastern Bering Sea, 1971-2050: mechanisms of interannual variability diagnosed with a numerical model' Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, vol. 121, no. 2, pp. 1476-1501. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JC011449

Spring plankton dynamics in the Eastern Bering Sea, 1971-2050 : mechanisms of interannual variability diagnosed with a numerical model. / Banas, Neil S.; Zhang, Jinlun; Campbell, Robert G.; Sambrotto, Raymond N.; Lomas, Michael W.; Sherr, Evelyn; Sherr, Barry; Ashjian, Carin; Stoecker, Diane; Lessard, Evelyn J.

In: Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, Vol. 121, No. 2, 23.03.2016, p. 1476-1501.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spring plankton dynamics in the Eastern Bering Sea, 1971-2050

T2 - Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

AU - Banas, Neil S.

AU - Zhang, Jinlun

AU - Campbell, Robert G.

AU - Sambrotto, Raymond N.

AU - Lomas, Michael W.

AU - Sherr, Evelyn

AU - Sherr, Barry

AU - Ashjian, Carin

AU - Stoecker, Diane

AU - Lessard, Evelyn J.

PY - 2016/3/23

Y1 - 2016/3/23

N2 - A new planktonic ecosystem model was constructed for the Eastern Bering Sea based on observations from the 2007-2010 BEST/BSIERP (Bering Ecosystem Study/Bering Sea Integrated Ecosystem Research Program) field program. When run with forcing from a data-assimilative ice-ocean hindcast of 1971-2012, the model performs well against observations of spring bloom time evolution (phytoplankton and microzooplankton biomass, growth and grazing rates, and ratios among new, regenerated, and export production). On the southern middle shelf (57°N, station M2), the model replicates the generally inverse relationship between ice-retreat timing and spring bloom timing known from observations, and the simpler direct relationship between the two that has been observed on the northern middle shelf (62°N, station M8). The relationship between simulated mean primary production and mean temperature in spring (15 February to 15 July) is generally positive, although this was found to be an indirect relationship which does not continue to apply across a future projection of temperature and ice cover in the 2040s. At M2, the leading direct controls on total spring primary production are found to be advective and turbulent nutrient supply, suggesting that mesoscale, wind-driven processes - A dvective transport and storminess - may be crucial to long-term trends in spring primary production in the southeastern Bering Sea, with temperature and ice cover playing only indirect roles. Sensitivity experiments suggest that direct dependence of planktonic growth and metabolic rates on temperature is less significant overall than the other drivers correlated with temperature described above.

AB - A new planktonic ecosystem model was constructed for the Eastern Bering Sea based on observations from the 2007-2010 BEST/BSIERP (Bering Ecosystem Study/Bering Sea Integrated Ecosystem Research Program) field program. When run with forcing from a data-assimilative ice-ocean hindcast of 1971-2012, the model performs well against observations of spring bloom time evolution (phytoplankton and microzooplankton biomass, growth and grazing rates, and ratios among new, regenerated, and export production). On the southern middle shelf (57°N, station M2), the model replicates the generally inverse relationship between ice-retreat timing and spring bloom timing known from observations, and the simpler direct relationship between the two that has been observed on the northern middle shelf (62°N, station M8). The relationship between simulated mean primary production and mean temperature in spring (15 February to 15 July) is generally positive, although this was found to be an indirect relationship which does not continue to apply across a future projection of temperature and ice cover in the 2040s. At M2, the leading direct controls on total spring primary production are found to be advective and turbulent nutrient supply, suggesting that mesoscale, wind-driven processes - A dvective transport and storminess - may be crucial to long-term trends in spring primary production in the southeastern Bering Sea, with temperature and ice cover playing only indirect roles. Sensitivity experiments suggest that direct dependence of planktonic growth and metabolic rates on temperature is less significant overall than the other drivers correlated with temperature described above.

KW - Bering Sea

KW - climate change

KW - ecosystem model

KW - microzooplankton

KW - phenology

KW - phytoplankton bloom

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961718032&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/2015JC011449

DO - 10.1002/2015JC011449

M3 - Article

VL - 121

SP - 1476

EP - 1501

JO - Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

JF - Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

SN - 0148-0227

IS - 2

ER -