Spectral pathology: general discussion

Christopher Sammon, Zachary D. Schultz, Sergei Kazarian, Hugh Barr, Royston Goodacre, Duncan Graham, Matthew J. Baker, Peter Gardner, Bayden Wood, Colin J. Campbell, Richard Dluhy, Samir El-Mashtoly, Christopher Phillips, Jonathan Frost, Max Diem, Achim Kohler, Parvez Haris, Alexander Apolonskiy, Hemmel Amrania, Peter LaschZhe Zhang, Wolfgang Petrich, Ganesh Dhruvananda Sockalingum, Nick Stone, Klaus Gerwert, Ioan Notingher, Rohit Bhargava, Niels Kröger-Lui, Martin Isabelle, Michael Pilling

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Parvez Haris opened the discussion of the introductory lecture by Max Diem: Varying degrees of accuracy have been obtained for discrimination between cancerous and non-cancerous tissues using vibrational spectroscopic methods. What are the explanations for these variation in accuracy between cancerous and non-cancerous tissues and how do they correlate with accuracy from other techniques including histopathology?
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)155-186
Number of pages32
JournalFaraday Discussions
Volume187
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2016

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • spectral pathology
  • variations in accuracy

Cite this

Sammon, C., Schultz, Z. D., Kazarian, S., Barr, H., Goodacre, R., Graham, D., ... Pilling, M. (2016). Spectral pathology: general discussion. Faraday Discussions, 187, 155-186. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6FD90011A