Specificity of recumbent cycling as a training modality for the functional movements: sit-to-stand and step-up

Andrew Kerr, D Rafferty, F. Moffat, G. Morlan

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    11 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background
    The principle of specificity in muscle training requires the training mode to reflect the desired outcome. The observed similarity of lower limb movements during recumbent cycling to the functional movements sit-to-stand and step-up presents the possibility of using recumbent cycling in a rehabilitation context. This may reduce the need to practice the actual task which in some, less able, patients may be labour intensive and patient fatiguing. To date no studies have compared recumbent cycling to these functional movements. This study therefore aimed to compare the lower limb kinematics and muscle activity between recumbent cycling and both sit-to-stand and step-up movements.

    Methods
    Electromyographic and kinematic signals from 12 young (mean age 42.1 years) healthy participants were collected during the performance of three activities: (1) cycling at 60 rpm, (2) sit-to-stand and (3) a single step-up. Only the extension phase of each movement was compared.

    Findings
    Although the results demonstrated differences in joint movement and muscle activation, e.g., greater gastrocnemius activity during recumbent cycling (P < 0.00), knee range of motion and average root mean square activity for rectus femoris, biceps femoris and the sum of the average activity for five muscles recorded showed no difference (P > 0.05) suggesting that there was sufficient agreement to support the use of recumbent cycling as a specific training modality for the sit-to-stand and step-up movements. This finding may have positive implications for the rehabilitation of a wide range of patients in the early stages of rehabilitation.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages1104-1111
    Number of pages8
    JournalClinical Biomechanics
    Volume22
    Issue number10
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2007

    Fingerprint

    Rehabilitation
    Biomechanical Phenomena
    Muscles
    Lower Extremity
    Healthy Volunteers
    Joints

    Keywords

    • recumbent cycling
    • sit-to-stand
    • step-up
    • kinematics
    • EMG

    Cite this

    @article{805c2183fb044a429ae9f1bc3b351e6d,
    title = "Specificity of recumbent cycling as a training modality for the functional movements: sit-to-stand and step-up",
    abstract = "Background The principle of specificity in muscle training requires the training mode to reflect the desired outcome. The observed similarity of lower limb movements during recumbent cycling to the functional movements sit-to-stand and step-up presents the possibility of using recumbent cycling in a rehabilitation context. This may reduce the need to practice the actual task which in some, less able, patients may be labour intensive and patient fatiguing. To date no studies have compared recumbent cycling to these functional movements. This study therefore aimed to compare the lower limb kinematics and muscle activity between recumbent cycling and both sit-to-stand and step-up movements. Methods Electromyographic and kinematic signals from 12 young (mean age 42.1 years) healthy participants were collected during the performance of three activities: (1) cycling at 60 rpm, (2) sit-to-stand and (3) a single step-up. Only the extension phase of each movement was compared. Findings Although the results demonstrated differences in joint movement and muscle activation, e.g., greater gastrocnemius activity during recumbent cycling (P < 0.00), knee range of motion and average root mean square activity for rectus femoris, biceps femoris and the sum of the average activity for five muscles recorded showed no difference (P > 0.05) suggesting that there was sufficient agreement to support the use of recumbent cycling as a specific training modality for the sit-to-stand and step-up movements. This finding may have positive implications for the rehabilitation of a wide range of patients in the early stages of rehabilitation.",
    keywords = "recumbent cycling, sit-to-stand, step-up, kinematics, EMG",
    author = "Andrew Kerr and D Rafferty and F. Moffat and G. Morlan",
    year = "2007",
    month = "12",
    doi = "10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.06.006",
    language = "English",
    volume = "22",
    pages = "1104--1111",
    journal = "Clinical Biomechanics",
    issn = "0268-0033",
    number = "10",

    }

    Specificity of recumbent cycling as a training modality for the functional movements : sit-to-stand and step-up. / Kerr, Andrew; Rafferty, D; Moffat, F.; Morlan, G.

    In: Clinical Biomechanics, Vol. 22, No. 10, 12.2007, p. 1104-1111.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Specificity of recumbent cycling as a training modality for the functional movements

    T2 - Clinical Biomechanics

    AU - Kerr, Andrew

    AU - Rafferty, D

    AU - Moffat, F.

    AU - Morlan, G.

    PY - 2007/12

    Y1 - 2007/12

    N2 - Background The principle of specificity in muscle training requires the training mode to reflect the desired outcome. The observed similarity of lower limb movements during recumbent cycling to the functional movements sit-to-stand and step-up presents the possibility of using recumbent cycling in a rehabilitation context. This may reduce the need to practice the actual task which in some, less able, patients may be labour intensive and patient fatiguing. To date no studies have compared recumbent cycling to these functional movements. This study therefore aimed to compare the lower limb kinematics and muscle activity between recumbent cycling and both sit-to-stand and step-up movements. Methods Electromyographic and kinematic signals from 12 young (mean age 42.1 years) healthy participants were collected during the performance of three activities: (1) cycling at 60 rpm, (2) sit-to-stand and (3) a single step-up. Only the extension phase of each movement was compared. Findings Although the results demonstrated differences in joint movement and muscle activation, e.g., greater gastrocnemius activity during recumbent cycling (P < 0.00), knee range of motion and average root mean square activity for rectus femoris, biceps femoris and the sum of the average activity for five muscles recorded showed no difference (P > 0.05) suggesting that there was sufficient agreement to support the use of recumbent cycling as a specific training modality for the sit-to-stand and step-up movements. This finding may have positive implications for the rehabilitation of a wide range of patients in the early stages of rehabilitation.

    AB - Background The principle of specificity in muscle training requires the training mode to reflect the desired outcome. The observed similarity of lower limb movements during recumbent cycling to the functional movements sit-to-stand and step-up presents the possibility of using recumbent cycling in a rehabilitation context. This may reduce the need to practice the actual task which in some, less able, patients may be labour intensive and patient fatiguing. To date no studies have compared recumbent cycling to these functional movements. This study therefore aimed to compare the lower limb kinematics and muscle activity between recumbent cycling and both sit-to-stand and step-up movements. Methods Electromyographic and kinematic signals from 12 young (mean age 42.1 years) healthy participants were collected during the performance of three activities: (1) cycling at 60 rpm, (2) sit-to-stand and (3) a single step-up. Only the extension phase of each movement was compared. Findings Although the results demonstrated differences in joint movement and muscle activation, e.g., greater gastrocnemius activity during recumbent cycling (P < 0.00), knee range of motion and average root mean square activity for rectus femoris, biceps femoris and the sum of the average activity for five muscles recorded showed no difference (P > 0.05) suggesting that there was sufficient agreement to support the use of recumbent cycling as a specific training modality for the sit-to-stand and step-up movements. This finding may have positive implications for the rehabilitation of a wide range of patients in the early stages of rehabilitation.

    KW - recumbent cycling

    KW - sit-to-stand

    KW - step-up

    KW - kinematics

    KW - EMG

    U2 - 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.06.006

    DO - 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.06.006

    M3 - Article

    VL - 22

    SP - 1104

    EP - 1111

    JO - Clinical Biomechanics

    JF - Clinical Biomechanics

    SN - 0268-0033

    IS - 10

    ER -