Special issue - Reproductive politics in twentieth-century France and Britain

Jesse Olszynko-Gryn (Editor), Caroline Rusterholz (Editor)

Research output: Contribution to journalSpecial issue

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This special issue adopts a comparative approach to the politics of reproduction in twentieth-century France and Britain. The articles investigate the flow of information, practices and tools across national boundaries and between groups of experts, activists and laypeople. Empirically grounded in medical, news media and feminist sources, as well as ethnographic fieldwork, they reveal the practical similarities that existed between countries with officially different political regimes as well as local differences within the two countries. Taken as a whole, the special issue shows that the border between France and Britain was more porous than is typically apparent from nationally-focused studies: ideas, people and devices travelled in both directions; communication strategies were always able to evade the rule of law; contraceptive practices were surprisingly similar in both countries; and religion loomed large in debates on both sides of the channel.
LanguageEnglish
Pages117-229
JournalMedical History
Volume63
Issue number2
Early online date26 Mar 2019
Publication statusPublished - 30 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Politics
France
Religion
Contraceptive Agents
Reproduction
Equipment and Supplies
Direction compound
News Media
Activists
Political Regime
Rule of Law
Ethnographic
Field Work
Communication Strategies

Keywords

  • abortion
  • assisted conception
  • contraception
  • family planning
  • prenatal genetic screening
  • in vitro fertilisation (IVF)

Cite this

@article{2db48aec27464540bb624c5eea563848,
title = "Special issue - Reproductive politics in twentieth-century France and Britain",
abstract = "This special issue adopts a comparative approach to the politics of reproduction in twentieth-century France and Britain. The articles investigate the flow of information, practices and tools across national boundaries and between groups of experts, activists and laypeople. Empirically grounded in medical, news media and feminist sources, as well as ethnographic fieldwork, they reveal the practical similarities that existed between countries with officially different political regimes as well as local differences within the two countries. Taken as a whole, the special issue shows that the border between France and Britain was more porous than is typically apparent from nationally-focused studies: ideas, people and devices travelled in both directions; communication strategies were always able to evade the rule of law; contraceptive practices were surprisingly similar in both countries; and religion loomed large in debates on both sides of the channel.",
keywords = "abortion, assisted conception, contraception, family planning, prenatal genetic screening, in vitro fertilisation (IVF)",
author = "Jesse Olszynko-Gryn and Caroline Rusterholz",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "30",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "117--229",
journal = "Medical History",
issn = "0025-7273",
number = "2",

}

Special issue - Reproductive politics in twentieth-century France and Britain. / Olszynko-Gryn, Jesse (Editor); Rusterholz, Caroline (Editor).

In: Medical History, Vol. 63, No. 2, 30.04.2019, p. 117-229.

Research output: Contribution to journalSpecial issue

TY - JOUR

T1 - Special issue - Reproductive politics in twentieth-century France and Britain

A2 - Olszynko-Gryn, Jesse

A2 - Rusterholz, Caroline

PY - 2019/4/30

Y1 - 2019/4/30

N2 - This special issue adopts a comparative approach to the politics of reproduction in twentieth-century France and Britain. The articles investigate the flow of information, practices and tools across national boundaries and between groups of experts, activists and laypeople. Empirically grounded in medical, news media and feminist sources, as well as ethnographic fieldwork, they reveal the practical similarities that existed between countries with officially different political regimes as well as local differences within the two countries. Taken as a whole, the special issue shows that the border between France and Britain was more porous than is typically apparent from nationally-focused studies: ideas, people and devices travelled in both directions; communication strategies were always able to evade the rule of law; contraceptive practices were surprisingly similar in both countries; and religion loomed large in debates on both sides of the channel.

AB - This special issue adopts a comparative approach to the politics of reproduction in twentieth-century France and Britain. The articles investigate the flow of information, practices and tools across national boundaries and between groups of experts, activists and laypeople. Empirically grounded in medical, news media and feminist sources, as well as ethnographic fieldwork, they reveal the practical similarities that existed between countries with officially different political regimes as well as local differences within the two countries. Taken as a whole, the special issue shows that the border between France and Britain was more porous than is typically apparent from nationally-focused studies: ideas, people and devices travelled in both directions; communication strategies were always able to evade the rule of law; contraceptive practices were surprisingly similar in both countries; and religion loomed large in debates on both sides of the channel.

KW - abortion

KW - assisted conception

KW - contraception

KW - family planning

KW - prenatal genetic screening

KW - in vitro fertilisation (IVF)

UR - https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/medical-history/issue/23DC47816C451785F35E9C6872268DAC

M3 - Special issue

VL - 63

SP - 117

EP - 229

JO - Medical History

T2 - Medical History

JF - Medical History

SN - 0025-7273

IS - 2

ER -