Something old, something new?: competing logics and the hybrid nature of new corporate professions

Damian Hodgson, Steve Paton, Daniel Muzio

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    17 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The professionalisation of certain management occupations, such as Project Management and HRM, has been neglected in recent debates on professions, which instead focus upon the de-regulation of collegial professions or the failure or unwillingness of new expert occupations to professionalise. Project management represents one of a handful of ‘management professions’ which confound this interpretation, explicitly pursuing a ‘corporate professionalisation’ project with some degree of success. This article focuses on the strategic activities of the principal British professional association in this field, the Association for Project Management (APM), as it negotiates a path between exploiting established sources of legitimacy and exploring a novel conception of professionalism. In the process, the association manipulates collegial and corporate logics of professionalism, in terms of its relationships with key stakeholders, its global orientation, its knowledge base and strategies of occupational closure. Drawing on interviews with APM officials and broader documentary analysis, this article analyses the conditions which have produced this hybrid model of professionalism, highlighting the pragmatic management of tensions through the combination of distinct, even contradictory, professionalisation logics.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages745-759
    Number of pages15
    JournalBritish Journal of Management
    Volume26
    Issue number4
    Early online date6 May 2015
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2015

    Fingerprint

    Project management
    Deregulation
    Logic
    Professionalism
    Professionalization

    Keywords

    • professionalisation
    • project management
    • corporate professionalism

    Cite this

    @article{9756a950c924429b9e43b8c99e064c4b,
    title = "Something old, something new?: competing logics and the hybrid nature of new corporate professions",
    abstract = "The professionalisation of certain management occupations, such as Project Management and HRM, has been neglected in recent debates on professions, which instead focus upon the de-regulation of collegial professions or the failure or unwillingness of new expert occupations to professionalise. Project management represents one of a handful of ‘management professions’ which confound this interpretation, explicitly pursuing a ‘corporate professionalisation’ project with some degree of success. This article focuses on the strategic activities of the principal British professional association in this field, the Association for Project Management (APM), as it negotiates a path between exploiting established sources of legitimacy and exploring a novel conception of professionalism. In the process, the association manipulates collegial and corporate logics of professionalism, in terms of its relationships with key stakeholders, its global orientation, its knowledge base and strategies of occupational closure. Drawing on interviews with APM officials and broader documentary analysis, this article analyses the conditions which have produced this hybrid model of professionalism, highlighting the pragmatic management of tensions through the combination of distinct, even contradictory, professionalisation logics.",
    keywords = "professionalisation, project management, corporate professionalism",
    author = "Damian Hodgson and Steve Paton and Daniel Muzio",
    year = "2015",
    month = "10",
    doi = "10.1111/1467-8551.12105",
    language = "English",
    volume = "26",
    pages = "745--759",
    journal = "British Journal of Management",
    issn = "1045-3172",
    number = "4",

    }

    Something old, something new? competing logics and the hybrid nature of new corporate professions. / Hodgson, Damian; Paton, Steve; Muzio, Daniel.

    In: British Journal of Management, Vol. 26, No. 4, 10.2015, p. 745-759.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Something old, something new?

    T2 - British Journal of Management

    AU - Hodgson, Damian

    AU - Paton, Steve

    AU - Muzio, Daniel

    PY - 2015/10

    Y1 - 2015/10

    N2 - The professionalisation of certain management occupations, such as Project Management and HRM, has been neglected in recent debates on professions, which instead focus upon the de-regulation of collegial professions or the failure or unwillingness of new expert occupations to professionalise. Project management represents one of a handful of ‘management professions’ which confound this interpretation, explicitly pursuing a ‘corporate professionalisation’ project with some degree of success. This article focuses on the strategic activities of the principal British professional association in this field, the Association for Project Management (APM), as it negotiates a path between exploiting established sources of legitimacy and exploring a novel conception of professionalism. In the process, the association manipulates collegial and corporate logics of professionalism, in terms of its relationships with key stakeholders, its global orientation, its knowledge base and strategies of occupational closure. Drawing on interviews with APM officials and broader documentary analysis, this article analyses the conditions which have produced this hybrid model of professionalism, highlighting the pragmatic management of tensions through the combination of distinct, even contradictory, professionalisation logics.

    AB - The professionalisation of certain management occupations, such as Project Management and HRM, has been neglected in recent debates on professions, which instead focus upon the de-regulation of collegial professions or the failure or unwillingness of new expert occupations to professionalise. Project management represents one of a handful of ‘management professions’ which confound this interpretation, explicitly pursuing a ‘corporate professionalisation’ project with some degree of success. This article focuses on the strategic activities of the principal British professional association in this field, the Association for Project Management (APM), as it negotiates a path between exploiting established sources of legitimacy and exploring a novel conception of professionalism. In the process, the association manipulates collegial and corporate logics of professionalism, in terms of its relationships with key stakeholders, its global orientation, its knowledge base and strategies of occupational closure. Drawing on interviews with APM officials and broader documentary analysis, this article analyses the conditions which have produced this hybrid model of professionalism, highlighting the pragmatic management of tensions through the combination of distinct, even contradictory, professionalisation logics.

    KW - professionalisation

    KW - project management

    KW - corporate professionalism

    UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/%28ISSN%291467-8551

    U2 - 10.1111/1467-8551.12105

    DO - 10.1111/1467-8551.12105

    M3 - Article

    VL - 26

    SP - 745

    EP - 759

    JO - British Journal of Management

    JF - British Journal of Management

    SN - 1045-3172

    IS - 4

    ER -