Projects per year
Purpose Solid dispersions formulations manufactured by Hot-Melt-Extrusion (HME) have shown to improve drug release for BCS class II drugs, such as Mefenamic acid (MFA). Drug release for MFA is highly dependent on particle size. Commercially available MFA capsules have shown high variability in their drug release profile which may lead to variable efficacy. This study shows how solid dispersion formulations and microstructure design significantly improve product performance. Methods Solid dispersion formulation of 50% w/w Mefenamic acid (MFA, Sigma Aldrich) and Soluplus (BASF) containing 15% w/w Sorbitol (Merck) as plasticiser (SOL15) was prepared by HME (Process 11, Thermofisher). The formulation was a) pelletised and hand filled into size 0 hard gelatine capsules and b) 3D printed (3DP) with a porous core exposed to the surface (Figure 1) to achieve a MFA dose of 250mg. Neat MFA powder and a physical mixture (PM) of 50% (w/w) MFA and SOL15 powder were also hand filled into size 0 hard gelatine capsules to generate a MFA dose of 250mg. Pellets were prepared by cutting the HME filament (~2 mm diameter) to the length of approximately ~2mm. The 3DP tablets were printed with a novel in-house designed integrated HME-3D printer (Intellectual Property Office UK, patent application number 2101534.2). The 3D printed tablet shape was elliptical with a length of 22 mm, width of 12 mm and height of 5mm. The Infill % was set to 47.3%, which equated to an infill line distance of 0.85 mm (gap between infill lines). No top or bottom layer were printed to create a porous tablet core. Drug release profiles of all three formulations were established by performing a Dissolution test based on USP 37 of Mefenamic acid capsules (n=6) in Tris buffer pH 9 and UV analysis. The % drug release (normalised to tablet weight) was calculated and reported. Results Whilst MFA powder achieved a very consistent released, it failed to release >85 % content within 60 minutes (Figure 2A). The physical mixture showed greater variation between the 6 tablets, but released >85% content at 55 minutes. The pelletised solid dispersion formulation significantly improved drug release compared to neat MFA powder and the PM, >85% drug release within 35 minutes and therefore complying with pharmacopeial release requirements (>85% at 45 minutes) (Figure 2B). The variation between individual tablets was also lower compared to the PM. The 3DP tablet, with a highly controlled microstructure, achieved complete drug release at 20 minutes (91.6%). The variation in drug release was very high at 10 minutes only and very low at all other data points. Conclusions Solid dispersion formulation significantly improved the drug release profile by increasing the consistency and reducing the time to achieve complete drug release (>85%) to 35 minutes and 20 minutes for the 3DP tablet. This demonstrates the possibility of fine tuning drug release profiles through micro-structure control by 3DP.
|Number of pages||1|
|Publication status||Published - 18 Oct 2021|
|Event||American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS) 2021 PharmSci 360 - Philadelphia, United States|
Duration: 17 Oct 2021 → 20 Oct 2021
|Conference||American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS) 2021 PharmSci 360|
|Period||17/10/21 → 20/10/21|
- solid dispersion
- pharmaceutical formulation
- 3D Printing
- product performance
FingerprintDive into the research topics of 'Solid dispersions: improving drug performance through tablet micro-structure design'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
- 2 Active