Socio-ecological resilience and urban design: defining the common ground and a way forward for practice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The macro-trends revolving around urbanisation call for revising current approaches to urban development. In this context, the concept of resilience, originally developed in system ecology, has been deemed as a useful framework to address to these challenges and as an explanatory method to describe the complex dynamics regulating urban systems. However, while resilience science has gained importance in the academic debate in vulnerability and risk management, urban planning and governance, it is only superficially investigated in the field of urban design. This paper aims at bridging the gap between urban design and socio-ecological resilience, advocating a resilience-based approach to the design of urban systems. Currently, existing literature addressing the relationship between urban design and resilience focuses on two main issues: 1) the need for a common ground upon which to build the bridge between socio-ecological resilience and urban design; 2) the need for a clear and solid conceptual framework for urban designers to foster resilience in the built environment. The paper formulates suggestions on how these issues could be addressed. These are: 1) the definition of urban morphology as the common ground upon which the bridge between resilience in system ecology and in urban design should be built, and 2), on this common ground, the definition of a research route to link approach to sustainable urban design to socio-ecological resilience. The paper concludes by presenting possible future research steps.
LanguageEnglish
Pages3-8
Number of pages6
JournalTerra Spectra: Central European Journal of Spatial and Landscape Planning
VolumeVII
Issue number1/2015
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015

Fingerprint

urban design
resilience
urban system
ecology
urban morphology
urban planning
conceptual framework
urban development
urbanization
vulnerability
risk management
governance
trend

Keywords

  • urbanisation
  • urban development
  • urban design
  • sustainability

Cite this

@article{7eea03e2c4774c9c9348b732560dc875,
title = "Socio-ecological resilience and urban design: defining the common ground and a way forward for practice",
abstract = "The macro-trends revolving around urbanisation call for revising current approaches to urban development. In this context, the concept of resilience, originally developed in system ecology, has been deemed as a useful framework to address to these challenges and as an explanatory method to describe the complex dynamics regulating urban systems. However, while resilience science has gained importance in the academic debate in vulnerability and risk management, urban planning and governance, it is only superficially investigated in the field of urban design. This paper aims at bridging the gap between urban design and socio-ecological resilience, advocating a resilience-based approach to the design of urban systems. Currently, existing literature addressing the relationship between urban design and resilience focuses on two main issues: 1) the need for a common ground upon which to build the bridge between socio-ecological resilience and urban design; 2) the need for a clear and solid conceptual framework for urban designers to foster resilience in the built environment. The paper formulates suggestions on how these issues could be addressed. These are: 1) the definition of urban morphology as the common ground upon which the bridge between resilience in system ecology and in urban design should be built, and 2), on this common ground, the definition of a research route to link approach to sustainable urban design to socio-ecological resilience. The paper concludes by presenting possible future research steps.",
keywords = "urbanisation, urban development, urban design, sustainability",
author = "Alessandra Feliciotti",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "VII",
pages = "3--8",
journal = "Central European Journal of Spatial and Landscape Planning",
issn = "1338-0370",
number = "1/2015",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Socio-ecological resilience and urban design

T2 - Central European Journal of Spatial and Landscape Planning

AU - Feliciotti, Alessandra

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - The macro-trends revolving around urbanisation call for revising current approaches to urban development. In this context, the concept of resilience, originally developed in system ecology, has been deemed as a useful framework to address to these challenges and as an explanatory method to describe the complex dynamics regulating urban systems. However, while resilience science has gained importance in the academic debate in vulnerability and risk management, urban planning and governance, it is only superficially investigated in the field of urban design. This paper aims at bridging the gap between urban design and socio-ecological resilience, advocating a resilience-based approach to the design of urban systems. Currently, existing literature addressing the relationship between urban design and resilience focuses on two main issues: 1) the need for a common ground upon which to build the bridge between socio-ecological resilience and urban design; 2) the need for a clear and solid conceptual framework for urban designers to foster resilience in the built environment. The paper formulates suggestions on how these issues could be addressed. These are: 1) the definition of urban morphology as the common ground upon which the bridge between resilience in system ecology and in urban design should be built, and 2), on this common ground, the definition of a research route to link approach to sustainable urban design to socio-ecological resilience. The paper concludes by presenting possible future research steps.

AB - The macro-trends revolving around urbanisation call for revising current approaches to urban development. In this context, the concept of resilience, originally developed in system ecology, has been deemed as a useful framework to address to these challenges and as an explanatory method to describe the complex dynamics regulating urban systems. However, while resilience science has gained importance in the academic debate in vulnerability and risk management, urban planning and governance, it is only superficially investigated in the field of urban design. This paper aims at bridging the gap between urban design and socio-ecological resilience, advocating a resilience-based approach to the design of urban systems. Currently, existing literature addressing the relationship between urban design and resilience focuses on two main issues: 1) the need for a common ground upon which to build the bridge between socio-ecological resilience and urban design; 2) the need for a clear and solid conceptual framework for urban designers to foster resilience in the built environment. The paper formulates suggestions on how these issues could be addressed. These are: 1) the definition of urban morphology as the common ground upon which the bridge between resilience in system ecology and in urban design should be built, and 2), on this common ground, the definition of a research route to link approach to sustainable urban design to socio-ecological resilience. The paper concludes by presenting possible future research steps.

KW - urbanisation

KW - urban development

KW - urban design

KW - sustainability

UR - http://spectra-perseus.org

UR - http://spectra-perseus.org/index.php/TERRA-SPECTRA/TERRA-SPECTRA-Planning-Studies-online-version

M3 - Article

VL - VII

SP - 3

EP - 8

JO - Central European Journal of Spatial and Landscape Planning

JF - Central European Journal of Spatial and Landscape Planning

SN - 1338-0370

IS - 1/2015

ER -