Social sustainability in the oil and gas industry: institutional pressure and the anagement of sustainable supply chains

Athanasios Rentizelas, Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, Ahmed Darwish Al Balushi , Andrea Tuni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article addresses certain gaps highlighted in the literature relating to the investigation of supplier selection through a theoretical lens, based on contextual factors, institutional pressure, and industrial features. Consequently, this article sheds light on how a government’s strategic plans can drive organisations to incorporate elements of social sustainability into their supply chains. A successful case from Oman which demonstrates the social dimension of sustainability in selecting suppliers in the oil and gas sector is presented, along with the government’s role and the mechanisms it has applied. A survey of purchasing, procurement and supply chain managers in Oman’s major oil and gas organisations was conducted, along with interviews. The results of this research were further analysed through the lens of institutional theory, addressing a genuine research gap. It was found that: (a) coercive governmental pressure is not sufficient to truly develop socially sustainable practices in organisations if the organisations themselves do not show initiative, as this leads to compliant rather than innovative practice; and (b) policy makers need to be aware that coercive pressure alone does not lead to continuous improvement of social sustainability performance, due to the ceiling effect, i.e. organisations meeting only the minimum governmental requirements
LanguageEnglish
Number of pages22
JournalAnnals of Operations Research
Early online date27 Mar 2018
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 27 Mar 2018

Fingerprint

Oil and gas industry
Oil
Oman
Supply chain
Social sustainability
Institutional pressures
Government
Gas
Social dimension
Strategic plan
Supplier selection
Managers
Institutional theory
Purchasing
Continuous improvement
Procurement
Contextual factors
Sustainability
Politicians
Suppliers

Keywords

  • sustainable operations
  • supply chain
  • sustainability
  • social responsibility
  • coervice pressure

Cite this

@article{c6bc93362b8b46afbdee55aeb5301456,
title = "Social sustainability in the oil and gas industry: institutional pressure and the anagement of sustainable supply chains",
abstract = "This article addresses certain gaps highlighted in the literature relating to the investigation of supplier selection through a theoretical lens, based on contextual factors, institutional pressure, and industrial features. Consequently, this article sheds light on how a government’s strategic plans can drive organisations to incorporate elements of social sustainability into their supply chains. A successful case from Oman which demonstrates the social dimension of sustainability in selecting suppliers in the oil and gas sector is presented, along with the government’s role and the mechanisms it has applied. A survey of purchasing, procurement and supply chain managers in Oman’s major oil and gas organisations was conducted, along with interviews. The results of this research were further analysed through the lens of institutional theory, addressing a genuine research gap. It was found that: (a) coercive governmental pressure is not sufficient to truly develop socially sustainable practices in organisations if the organisations themselves do not show initiative, as this leads to compliant rather than innovative practice; and (b) policy makers need to be aware that coercive pressure alone does not lead to continuous improvement of social sustainability performance, due to the ceiling effect, i.e. organisations meeting only the minimum governmental requirements",
keywords = "sustainable operations, supply chain, sustainability, social responsibility, coervice pressure",
author = "Athanasios Rentizelas and {Lopes de Sousa Jabbour}, {Ana Beatriz} and {Al Balushi}, {Ahmed Darwish} and Andrea Tuni",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1007/s10479-018-2821-3",
language = "English",
journal = "Annals of Operations Research",
issn = "0254-5330",

}

Social sustainability in the oil and gas industry : institutional pressure and the anagement of sustainable supply chains. / Rentizelas, Athanasios; Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz; Al Balushi , Ahmed Darwish; Tuni, Andrea.

In: Annals of Operations Research, 27.03.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social sustainability in the oil and gas industry

T2 - Annals of Operations Research

AU - Rentizelas, Athanasios

AU - Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz

AU - Al Balushi , Ahmed Darwish

AU - Tuni, Andrea

PY - 2018/3/27

Y1 - 2018/3/27

N2 - This article addresses certain gaps highlighted in the literature relating to the investigation of supplier selection through a theoretical lens, based on contextual factors, institutional pressure, and industrial features. Consequently, this article sheds light on how a government’s strategic plans can drive organisations to incorporate elements of social sustainability into their supply chains. A successful case from Oman which demonstrates the social dimension of sustainability in selecting suppliers in the oil and gas sector is presented, along with the government’s role and the mechanisms it has applied. A survey of purchasing, procurement and supply chain managers in Oman’s major oil and gas organisations was conducted, along with interviews. The results of this research were further analysed through the lens of institutional theory, addressing a genuine research gap. It was found that: (a) coercive governmental pressure is not sufficient to truly develop socially sustainable practices in organisations if the organisations themselves do not show initiative, as this leads to compliant rather than innovative practice; and (b) policy makers need to be aware that coercive pressure alone does not lead to continuous improvement of social sustainability performance, due to the ceiling effect, i.e. organisations meeting only the minimum governmental requirements

AB - This article addresses certain gaps highlighted in the literature relating to the investigation of supplier selection through a theoretical lens, based on contextual factors, institutional pressure, and industrial features. Consequently, this article sheds light on how a government’s strategic plans can drive organisations to incorporate elements of social sustainability into their supply chains. A successful case from Oman which demonstrates the social dimension of sustainability in selecting suppliers in the oil and gas sector is presented, along with the government’s role and the mechanisms it has applied. A survey of purchasing, procurement and supply chain managers in Oman’s major oil and gas organisations was conducted, along with interviews. The results of this research were further analysed through the lens of institutional theory, addressing a genuine research gap. It was found that: (a) coercive governmental pressure is not sufficient to truly develop socially sustainable practices in organisations if the organisations themselves do not show initiative, as this leads to compliant rather than innovative practice; and (b) policy makers need to be aware that coercive pressure alone does not lead to continuous improvement of social sustainability performance, due to the ceiling effect, i.e. organisations meeting only the minimum governmental requirements

KW - sustainable operations

KW - supply chain

KW - sustainability

KW - social responsibility

KW - coervice pressure

U2 - 10.1007/s10479-018-2821-3

DO - 10.1007/s10479-018-2821-3

M3 - Article

JO - Annals of Operations Research

JF - Annals of Operations Research

SN - 0254-5330

ER -