Social reporting, engagements, controversies and conflict in an arena context

G. Georgakopoul, I. Thomson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To empirically investigate relationships between engagement activities and social reporting practices in a controversial and environmentally sensitive industry. The interactions investigated were not restricted to stakeholder relationships but included other communications between different stakeholders. This paper presents a case study approach framed within a contested political arena. Data was gathered using multiple methods including interviews with salmon farming organisations, stakeholders, rule-enforcers, issue amplifiers and political institutions. All arena participants used social reports in their interactions to communicate the social, environmental and economic consequences of salmon farming. Different social reporting practices appeared to be reflexively related to the competing motivations of different stakeholders. However, social reporting in Scottish salmon farming was fragmented, driven by many different factors and did not necessarily lead to a resolution of the conflicts within this arena. Researching social reporting should consider the co-existence and co-evolution of different social reports, competing motivations and engagement tactics of stakeholders. This paper identifies the construction of holistic reports from multiple reports and issue amplification as two research methods to engage in social and environmental policy debates. This paper presents empirical evidence from an under-researched industry, which has the potential to develop our theoretical understanding of social reporting. It also introduces the arena concept as a useful tool in further social reporting research.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1116-1143
Number of pages28
JournalAccounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal
Volume21
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Social reporting
Stakeholders
Salmon
Farming
Interaction
Industry
Social policy
Amplification
Environmental policy
Coexistence
Communication
Factors
Research methods
Empirical evidence
Tactics
Economic consequences
Stakeholder relationships
Political institutions
Coevolution

Keywords

  • social reporting
  • stakeholder engagements
  • arena study
  • salmon farming

Cite this

@article{bd801a85ad64481ab9a6291088b8f951,
title = "Social reporting, engagements, controversies and conflict in an arena context",
abstract = "Purpose: To empirically investigate relationships between engagement activities and social reporting practices in a controversial and environmentally sensitive industry. The interactions investigated were not restricted to stakeholder relationships but included other communications between different stakeholders. This paper presents a case study approach framed within a contested political arena. Data was gathered using multiple methods including interviews with salmon farming organisations, stakeholders, rule-enforcers, issue amplifiers and political institutions. All arena participants used social reports in their interactions to communicate the social, environmental and economic consequences of salmon farming. Different social reporting practices appeared to be reflexively related to the competing motivations of different stakeholders. However, social reporting in Scottish salmon farming was fragmented, driven by many different factors and did not necessarily lead to a resolution of the conflicts within this arena. Researching social reporting should consider the co-existence and co-evolution of different social reports, competing motivations and engagement tactics of stakeholders. This paper identifies the construction of holistic reports from multiple reports and issue amplification as two research methods to engage in social and environmental policy debates. This paper presents empirical evidence from an under-researched industry, which has the potential to develop our theoretical understanding of social reporting. It also introduces the arena concept as a useful tool in further social reporting research.",
keywords = "social reporting, stakeholder engagements, arena study, salmon farming",
author = "G. Georgakopoul and I. Thomson",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1108/09513570810918788",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "1116--1143",
journal = "Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal",
issn = "0951-3574",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
number = "8",

}

Social reporting, engagements, controversies and conflict in an arena context. / Georgakopoul, G.; Thomson, I.

In: Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal , Vol. 21, No. 8, 2008, p. 1116-1143.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social reporting, engagements, controversies and conflict in an arena context

AU - Georgakopoul, G.

AU - Thomson, I.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Purpose: To empirically investigate relationships between engagement activities and social reporting practices in a controversial and environmentally sensitive industry. The interactions investigated were not restricted to stakeholder relationships but included other communications between different stakeholders. This paper presents a case study approach framed within a contested political arena. Data was gathered using multiple methods including interviews with salmon farming organisations, stakeholders, rule-enforcers, issue amplifiers and political institutions. All arena participants used social reports in their interactions to communicate the social, environmental and economic consequences of salmon farming. Different social reporting practices appeared to be reflexively related to the competing motivations of different stakeholders. However, social reporting in Scottish salmon farming was fragmented, driven by many different factors and did not necessarily lead to a resolution of the conflicts within this arena. Researching social reporting should consider the co-existence and co-evolution of different social reports, competing motivations and engagement tactics of stakeholders. This paper identifies the construction of holistic reports from multiple reports and issue amplification as two research methods to engage in social and environmental policy debates. This paper presents empirical evidence from an under-researched industry, which has the potential to develop our theoretical understanding of social reporting. It also introduces the arena concept as a useful tool in further social reporting research.

AB - Purpose: To empirically investigate relationships between engagement activities and social reporting practices in a controversial and environmentally sensitive industry. The interactions investigated were not restricted to stakeholder relationships but included other communications between different stakeholders. This paper presents a case study approach framed within a contested political arena. Data was gathered using multiple methods including interviews with salmon farming organisations, stakeholders, rule-enforcers, issue amplifiers and political institutions. All arena participants used social reports in their interactions to communicate the social, environmental and economic consequences of salmon farming. Different social reporting practices appeared to be reflexively related to the competing motivations of different stakeholders. However, social reporting in Scottish salmon farming was fragmented, driven by many different factors and did not necessarily lead to a resolution of the conflicts within this arena. Researching social reporting should consider the co-existence and co-evolution of different social reports, competing motivations and engagement tactics of stakeholders. This paper identifies the construction of holistic reports from multiple reports and issue amplification as two research methods to engage in social and environmental policy debates. This paper presents empirical evidence from an under-researched industry, which has the potential to develop our theoretical understanding of social reporting. It also introduces the arena concept as a useful tool in further social reporting research.

KW - social reporting

KW - stakeholder engagements

KW - arena study

KW - salmon farming

U2 - 10.1108/09513570810918788

DO - 10.1108/09513570810918788

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 1116

EP - 1143

JO - Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal

T2 - Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal

JF - Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal

SN - 0951-3574

IS - 8

ER -