Social relationship difficulties in autism and reactive attachment disorder: improving diagnostic validity through structured assessment

Claire Davidson, Anne O'Hare, Fiona Mactaggart, Jonathan Green, David Young, Christopher Gillberg, Helen Minnis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) versus Reactive Attachment Disorder (RAD) is a common diagnostic challenge for clinicians due to overlapping difficulties with social relationships. RAD is associated with neglect or maltreatment whereas ASD is not: accurate differential diagnosis is therefore critical. Very little research has investigated the relationship between the two, and it is unknown if standardised measures are able to discriminate between ASD and RAD. The current study aimed to address these issues. Fifty eight children with ASD, and no history of maltreatment, were group matched on age with 67 children with RAD. Group profiles on multi-informant measures of RAD were investigated and group differences explored. Discriminant function analysis determined assessment features that best discriminated between the two groups. Although, according to parent report, children with ASD presented with significantly fewer indiscriminate friendliness behaviours compared to the RAD group (p<0.001), 36 children with ASD appeared to meet core RAD criteria. However, structured observation clearly demonstrated that features were indicative of ASD and not RAD for all but 1 of these 36 children. Children with RAD and children with ASD may demonstrate similar social relationship difficulties but there appears to be a difference in the social quality of the interactions between the groups. In most cases it was possible to differentiate between children with ASD and children with RAD via structured observation. Nevertheless, for a small proportion of children with ASD, particularly those whose difficulties may be more subtle, our current standardised measures, including structured observation, may not be effective in differentiating RAD from ASD.
LanguageEnglish
Pages63-72
Number of pages10
JournalResearch in Developmental Disabilities
Volume40
Early online date6 Mar 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2015

Fingerprint

Reactive Attachment Disorder
Autistic Disorder
Disorder
Diagnostics
Observation
Autism Spectrum Disorder
Relationships
Discriminant Analysis
Interpersonal Relations

Keywords

  • reactive attachment disorder
  • autism spectrum disorder
  • indiscriminate friendliness
  • social relationships
  • differential diagnosis
  • observation

Cite this

Davidson, Claire ; O'Hare, Anne ; Mactaggart, Fiona ; Green, Jonathan ; Young, David ; Gillberg, Christopher ; Minnis, Helen. / Social relationship difficulties in autism and reactive attachment disorder : improving diagnostic validity through structured assessment. In: Research in Developmental Disabilities . 2015 ; Vol. 40. pp. 63-72.
@article{b947887045f342bca9c5f29f3df99043,
title = "Social relationship difficulties in autism and reactive attachment disorder: improving diagnostic validity through structured assessment",
abstract = "Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) versus Reactive Attachment Disorder (RAD) is a common diagnostic challenge for clinicians due to overlapping difficulties with social relationships. RAD is associated with neglect or maltreatment whereas ASD is not: accurate differential diagnosis is therefore critical. Very little research has investigated the relationship between the two, and it is unknown if standardised measures are able to discriminate between ASD and RAD. The current study aimed to address these issues. Fifty eight children with ASD, and no history of maltreatment, were group matched on age with 67 children with RAD. Group profiles on multi-informant measures of RAD were investigated and group differences explored. Discriminant function analysis determined assessment features that best discriminated between the two groups. Although, according to parent report, children with ASD presented with significantly fewer indiscriminate friendliness behaviours compared to the RAD group (p<0.001), 36 children with ASD appeared to meet core RAD criteria. However, structured observation clearly demonstrated that features were indicative of ASD and not RAD for all but 1 of these 36 children. Children with RAD and children with ASD may demonstrate similar social relationship difficulties but there appears to be a difference in the social quality of the interactions between the groups. In most cases it was possible to differentiate between children with ASD and children with RAD via structured observation. Nevertheless, for a small proportion of children with ASD, particularly those whose difficulties may be more subtle, our current standardised measures, including structured observation, may not be effective in differentiating RAD from ASD.",
keywords = "reactive attachment disorder, autism spectrum disorder, indiscriminate friendliness, social relationships, differential diagnosis, observation",
author = "Claire Davidson and Anne O'Hare and Fiona Mactaggart and Jonathan Green and David Young and Christopher Gillberg and Helen Minnis",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ridd.2015.01.007",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "63--72",
journal = "Research in Developmental Disabilities",
issn = "0891-4222",

}

Social relationship difficulties in autism and reactive attachment disorder : improving diagnostic validity through structured assessment. / Davidson, Claire; O'Hare, Anne; Mactaggart, Fiona; Green, Jonathan; Young, David; Gillberg, Christopher; Minnis, Helen.

In: Research in Developmental Disabilities , Vol. 40, 01.05.2015, p. 63-72.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social relationship difficulties in autism and reactive attachment disorder

T2 - Research in Developmental Disabilities

AU - Davidson, Claire

AU - O'Hare, Anne

AU - Mactaggart, Fiona

AU - Green, Jonathan

AU - Young, David

AU - Gillberg, Christopher

AU - Minnis, Helen

PY - 2015/5/1

Y1 - 2015/5/1

N2 - Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) versus Reactive Attachment Disorder (RAD) is a common diagnostic challenge for clinicians due to overlapping difficulties with social relationships. RAD is associated with neglect or maltreatment whereas ASD is not: accurate differential diagnosis is therefore critical. Very little research has investigated the relationship between the two, and it is unknown if standardised measures are able to discriminate between ASD and RAD. The current study aimed to address these issues. Fifty eight children with ASD, and no history of maltreatment, were group matched on age with 67 children with RAD. Group profiles on multi-informant measures of RAD were investigated and group differences explored. Discriminant function analysis determined assessment features that best discriminated between the two groups. Although, according to parent report, children with ASD presented with significantly fewer indiscriminate friendliness behaviours compared to the RAD group (p<0.001), 36 children with ASD appeared to meet core RAD criteria. However, structured observation clearly demonstrated that features were indicative of ASD and not RAD for all but 1 of these 36 children. Children with RAD and children with ASD may demonstrate similar social relationship difficulties but there appears to be a difference in the social quality of the interactions between the groups. In most cases it was possible to differentiate between children with ASD and children with RAD via structured observation. Nevertheless, for a small proportion of children with ASD, particularly those whose difficulties may be more subtle, our current standardised measures, including structured observation, may not be effective in differentiating RAD from ASD.

AB - Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) versus Reactive Attachment Disorder (RAD) is a common diagnostic challenge for clinicians due to overlapping difficulties with social relationships. RAD is associated with neglect or maltreatment whereas ASD is not: accurate differential diagnosis is therefore critical. Very little research has investigated the relationship between the two, and it is unknown if standardised measures are able to discriminate between ASD and RAD. The current study aimed to address these issues. Fifty eight children with ASD, and no history of maltreatment, were group matched on age with 67 children with RAD. Group profiles on multi-informant measures of RAD were investigated and group differences explored. Discriminant function analysis determined assessment features that best discriminated between the two groups. Although, according to parent report, children with ASD presented with significantly fewer indiscriminate friendliness behaviours compared to the RAD group (p<0.001), 36 children with ASD appeared to meet core RAD criteria. However, structured observation clearly demonstrated that features were indicative of ASD and not RAD for all but 1 of these 36 children. Children with RAD and children with ASD may demonstrate similar social relationship difficulties but there appears to be a difference in the social quality of the interactions between the groups. In most cases it was possible to differentiate between children with ASD and children with RAD via structured observation. Nevertheless, for a small proportion of children with ASD, particularly those whose difficulties may be more subtle, our current standardised measures, including structured observation, may not be effective in differentiating RAD from ASD.

KW - reactive attachment disorder

KW - autism spectrum disorder

KW - indiscriminate friendliness

KW - social relationships

KW - differential diagnosis

KW - observation

UR - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891422215000086

U2 - 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.01.007

DO - 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.01.007

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 63

EP - 72

JO - Research in Developmental Disabilities

JF - Research in Developmental Disabilities

SN - 0891-4222

ER -