Social disclosure, legitimacy theory and the role of the State

Pablo Archel, Javier Husillos, Carlos Larrinaga, Crawford Spence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

103 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The principal objective of this paper is to expand the scope of legitimacy theory (LT) through a detailed analysis of the links that exist between the legitimising strategies of firms and the characteristics of the political environment in which they are developed.
A discourse analysis was performed on the social and environmental disclosure (SED) of a multinational in the automotive sector with an established presence in Spain, in the context of the relational dynamics between the firm/society/state. Different channels of information were compared to capture both the official discourse as represented in the annual reports of the multinational and the discourse of employees and the State as represented in the media.
The results of the research show that the firm under study used SED strategically to legitimise a new production process through the manipulation of social perceptions, and that this strategy was supported implicitly and explicitly through ideological alignment with the State.
Despite a widely-held assumption of a pluralist political context, the State is presented here as aligning itself with corporate management as opposed to the welfare concerns of employees. Thus, future research calling for regulation of SED should preface such calls with consideration of the orientation of the State.
In contrast with the dominant approach to LT that considers the relationship of the firm with its stakeholders, the present study widens the scope of LT to consider the interplay between firm legitimating strategies and state support for such strategies.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1284-1307
Number of pages24
JournalAccounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal
Volume22
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Legitimacy theory
Role of the state
Disclosure
Environmental disclosure
Multinationals
Employees
Discourse
Firm strategy
Spain
Manipulation
Discourse analysis
Political environment
Corporate management
Production process
Annual reports
Social perception
Stakeholders
Alignment

Keywords

  • social disclosure
  • legitimacy theory
  • role of the state
  • egitimising strategies of firms
  • characteristics of the political environment

Cite this

Archel, Pablo ; Husillos, Javier ; Larrinaga, Carlos ; Spence, Crawford. / Social disclosure, legitimacy theory and the role of the State. In: Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal . 2009 ; Vol. 22, No. 8. pp. 1284-1307.
@article{9fbdab78ade049e6b673f36afaa4f1d6,
title = "Social disclosure, legitimacy theory and the role of the State",
abstract = "The principal objective of this paper is to expand the scope of legitimacy theory (LT) through a detailed analysis of the links that exist between the legitimising strategies of firms and the characteristics of the political environment in which they are developed. A discourse analysis was performed on the social and environmental disclosure (SED) of a multinational in the automotive sector with an established presence in Spain, in the context of the relational dynamics between the firm/society/state. Different channels of information were compared to capture both the official discourse as represented in the annual reports of the multinational and the discourse of employees and the State as represented in the media. The results of the research show that the firm under study used SED strategically to legitimise a new production process through the manipulation of social perceptions, and that this strategy was supported implicitly and explicitly through ideological alignment with the State. Despite a widely-held assumption of a pluralist political context, the State is presented here as aligning itself with corporate management as opposed to the welfare concerns of employees. Thus, future research calling for regulation of SED should preface such calls with consideration of the orientation of the State. In contrast with the dominant approach to LT that considers the relationship of the firm with its stakeholders, the present study widens the scope of LT to consider the interplay between firm legitimating strategies and state support for such strategies.",
keywords = "social disclosure, legitimacy theory, role of the state, egitimising strategies of firms, characteristics of the political environment",
author = "Pablo Archel and Javier Husillos and Carlos Larrinaga and Crawford Spence",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1108/09513570910999319",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "1284--1307",
journal = "Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal",
issn = "0951-3574",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
number = "8",

}

Social disclosure, legitimacy theory and the role of the State. / Archel, Pablo; Husillos, Javier; Larrinaga, Carlos; Spence, Crawford.

In: Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal , Vol. 22, No. 8, 2009, p. 1284-1307.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social disclosure, legitimacy theory and the role of the State

AU - Archel, Pablo

AU - Husillos, Javier

AU - Larrinaga, Carlos

AU - Spence, Crawford

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - The principal objective of this paper is to expand the scope of legitimacy theory (LT) through a detailed analysis of the links that exist between the legitimising strategies of firms and the characteristics of the political environment in which they are developed. A discourse analysis was performed on the social and environmental disclosure (SED) of a multinational in the automotive sector with an established presence in Spain, in the context of the relational dynamics between the firm/society/state. Different channels of information were compared to capture both the official discourse as represented in the annual reports of the multinational and the discourse of employees and the State as represented in the media. The results of the research show that the firm under study used SED strategically to legitimise a new production process through the manipulation of social perceptions, and that this strategy was supported implicitly and explicitly through ideological alignment with the State. Despite a widely-held assumption of a pluralist political context, the State is presented here as aligning itself with corporate management as opposed to the welfare concerns of employees. Thus, future research calling for regulation of SED should preface such calls with consideration of the orientation of the State. In contrast with the dominant approach to LT that considers the relationship of the firm with its stakeholders, the present study widens the scope of LT to consider the interplay between firm legitimating strategies and state support for such strategies.

AB - The principal objective of this paper is to expand the scope of legitimacy theory (LT) through a detailed analysis of the links that exist between the legitimising strategies of firms and the characteristics of the political environment in which they are developed. A discourse analysis was performed on the social and environmental disclosure (SED) of a multinational in the automotive sector with an established presence in Spain, in the context of the relational dynamics between the firm/society/state. Different channels of information were compared to capture both the official discourse as represented in the annual reports of the multinational and the discourse of employees and the State as represented in the media. The results of the research show that the firm under study used SED strategically to legitimise a new production process through the manipulation of social perceptions, and that this strategy was supported implicitly and explicitly through ideological alignment with the State. Despite a widely-held assumption of a pluralist political context, the State is presented here as aligning itself with corporate management as opposed to the welfare concerns of employees. Thus, future research calling for regulation of SED should preface such calls with consideration of the orientation of the State. In contrast with the dominant approach to LT that considers the relationship of the firm with its stakeholders, the present study widens the scope of LT to consider the interplay between firm legitimating strategies and state support for such strategies.

KW - social disclosure

KW - legitimacy theory

KW - role of the state

KW - egitimising strategies of firms

KW - characteristics of the political environment

U2 - 10.1108/09513570910999319

DO - 10.1108/09513570910999319

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 1284

EP - 1307

JO - Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal

T2 - Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal

JF - Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal

SN - 0951-3574

IS - 8

ER -