Social and environmental accounting, auditing, and reporting: a potential source of organisational risk governance?

J. Bebbington, I. Thomson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors examine the extent to which the practices of social and environmental accounting, auditing, and reporting (SEAAR) provide opportunities for the identification, communication, and management of social and environmental risks. In introducing and exploring accounting practices, the theoretical allegiances of accounting are also outlined in order to situate accounting as a social science discipline which experiences similar debates to other areas of scholarship. The authors also extend discussion of risk governance and accounting by reference to the 'new' literature on risk from writers such as Adams, Beck, and Lash. It is suggested that the insights from these broader theorists on risk apply equally to conventional accounting and attempts via SEAAR to create an expanded governance framework. In particular, Beck identifies a number of critical aspects of risk governance that are also central to an understanding of accounting, including: the danger of seeking verifiable and neutral truth; the causal denial of harm; the contestation of expert and lay knowledge of risks; social construction of risk; and the radicalisation of rationality. Paraphrasing Beck, it is argued that accounting and accountants are incapable of managing the risks of industrialisation as they are implicated in the creation and multiplication of these risks, yet accounting and accountants, in particular those engaged in SEAAR, can play an essential role in identifying these risks. It is further argued that the contribution of SEAAR to risk governance will largely depend upon a radicalisation of accounting rationality in practice.
LanguageEnglish
Pages38-55
Number of pages17
JournalEnvironment and Planning C: Government and Policy
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Fingerprint

auditing
governance
radicalization
environmental accounting
rationality
accounting
social construction
environmental risk
industrialization
communication
social science
writer

Keywords

  • accounting theory
  • corporate governance
  • social accounting
  • environmental accounting
  • SEAAR

Cite this

@article{3591c0e38b444dfba894241bbee57a06,
title = "Social and environmental accounting, auditing, and reporting: a potential source of organisational risk governance?",
abstract = "The authors examine the extent to which the practices of social and environmental accounting, auditing, and reporting (SEAAR) provide opportunities for the identification, communication, and management of social and environmental risks. In introducing and exploring accounting practices, the theoretical allegiances of accounting are also outlined in order to situate accounting as a social science discipline which experiences similar debates to other areas of scholarship. The authors also extend discussion of risk governance and accounting by reference to the 'new' literature on risk from writers such as Adams, Beck, and Lash. It is suggested that the insights from these broader theorists on risk apply equally to conventional accounting and attempts via SEAAR to create an expanded governance framework. In particular, Beck identifies a number of critical aspects of risk governance that are also central to an understanding of accounting, including: the danger of seeking verifiable and neutral truth; the causal denial of harm; the contestation of expert and lay knowledge of risks; social construction of risk; and the radicalisation of rationality. Paraphrasing Beck, it is argued that accounting and accountants are incapable of managing the risks of industrialisation as they are implicated in the creation and multiplication of these risks, yet accounting and accountants, in particular those engaged in SEAAR, can play an essential role in identifying these risks. It is further argued that the contribution of SEAAR to risk governance will largely depend upon a radicalisation of accounting rationality in practice.",
keywords = "accounting theory, corporate governance, social accounting, environmental accounting, SEAAR",
author = "J. Bebbington and I. Thomson",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1068/c0616j",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "38--55",
journal = "Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy",
issn = "1472-3425",
number = "1",

}

Social and environmental accounting, auditing, and reporting: a potential source of organisational risk governance? / Bebbington, J.; Thomson, I.

In: Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2007, p. 38-55.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social and environmental accounting, auditing, and reporting: a potential source of organisational risk governance?

AU - Bebbington, J.

AU - Thomson, I.

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - The authors examine the extent to which the practices of social and environmental accounting, auditing, and reporting (SEAAR) provide opportunities for the identification, communication, and management of social and environmental risks. In introducing and exploring accounting practices, the theoretical allegiances of accounting are also outlined in order to situate accounting as a social science discipline which experiences similar debates to other areas of scholarship. The authors also extend discussion of risk governance and accounting by reference to the 'new' literature on risk from writers such as Adams, Beck, and Lash. It is suggested that the insights from these broader theorists on risk apply equally to conventional accounting and attempts via SEAAR to create an expanded governance framework. In particular, Beck identifies a number of critical aspects of risk governance that are also central to an understanding of accounting, including: the danger of seeking verifiable and neutral truth; the causal denial of harm; the contestation of expert and lay knowledge of risks; social construction of risk; and the radicalisation of rationality. Paraphrasing Beck, it is argued that accounting and accountants are incapable of managing the risks of industrialisation as they are implicated in the creation and multiplication of these risks, yet accounting and accountants, in particular those engaged in SEAAR, can play an essential role in identifying these risks. It is further argued that the contribution of SEAAR to risk governance will largely depend upon a radicalisation of accounting rationality in practice.

AB - The authors examine the extent to which the practices of social and environmental accounting, auditing, and reporting (SEAAR) provide opportunities for the identification, communication, and management of social and environmental risks. In introducing and exploring accounting practices, the theoretical allegiances of accounting are also outlined in order to situate accounting as a social science discipline which experiences similar debates to other areas of scholarship. The authors also extend discussion of risk governance and accounting by reference to the 'new' literature on risk from writers such as Adams, Beck, and Lash. It is suggested that the insights from these broader theorists on risk apply equally to conventional accounting and attempts via SEAAR to create an expanded governance framework. In particular, Beck identifies a number of critical aspects of risk governance that are also central to an understanding of accounting, including: the danger of seeking verifiable and neutral truth; the causal denial of harm; the contestation of expert and lay knowledge of risks; social construction of risk; and the radicalisation of rationality. Paraphrasing Beck, it is argued that accounting and accountants are incapable of managing the risks of industrialisation as they are implicated in the creation and multiplication of these risks, yet accounting and accountants, in particular those engaged in SEAAR, can play an essential role in identifying these risks. It is further argued that the contribution of SEAAR to risk governance will largely depend upon a radicalisation of accounting rationality in practice.

KW - accounting theory

KW - corporate governance

KW - social accounting

KW - environmental accounting

KW - SEAAR

UR - http://www.envplan.com/abstract.cgi?id=c0616j

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/c0616j

U2 - 10.1068/c0616j

DO - 10.1068/c0616j

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 38

EP - 55

JO - Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy

T2 - Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy

JF - Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy

SN - 1472-3425

IS - 1

ER -