So what went wrong with the electoral system

the 2010 election result and the debate about electoral reform

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Single-member plurality is often thought to facilitate a two-party system of alternating single-party majority government. However, no party secured an overall majority in the 2010 UK election, which was followed by the formation of the first peacetime coalition government since the 1930s. This article assesses whether this outcome was a one-off occurrence or was symptomatic of longer term changes in voting patterns in the UK that have reduced the likelihood of singe party majorities. To do so it charts trends in the level of third party support and representation, the incidence of marginal seats, and bias in the treatment of the two largest parties.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationBritain Votes 2010
EditorsAndrew Geddes, Jonathan Tonge
Place of PublicationOxford
Publication statusPublished - 16 Sep 2010

Fingerprint

election result
electoral system
two-party system
reform
trend
voting
coalition
incidence
election

Keywords

  • electoral system
  • UK elections
  • voting behaviour

Cite this

@inbook{133eeb4ef7474cceb6f1c5ada92b4b7e,
title = "So what went wrong with the electoral system: the 2010 election result and the debate about electoral reform",
abstract = "Single-member plurality is often thought to facilitate a two-party system of alternating single-party majority government. However, no party secured an overall majority in the 2010 UK election, which was followed by the formation of the first peacetime coalition government since the 1930s. This article assesses whether this outcome was a one-off occurrence or was symptomatic of longer term changes in voting patterns in the UK that have reduced the likelihood of singe party majorities. To do so it charts trends in the level of third party support and representation, the incidence of marginal seats, and bias in the treatment of the two largest parties.",
keywords = "electoral system, UK elections, voting behaviour",
author = "John Curtice",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
day = "16",
language = "English",
isbn = "0199603278",
editor = "Geddes, {Andrew } and Jonathan Tonge",
booktitle = "Britain Votes 2010",

}

So what went wrong with the electoral system : the 2010 election result and the debate about electoral reform. / Curtice, John.

Britain Votes 2010. ed. / Andrew Geddes; Jonathan Tonge. Oxford, 2010.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - So what went wrong with the electoral system

T2 - the 2010 election result and the debate about electoral reform

AU - Curtice, John

PY - 2010/9/16

Y1 - 2010/9/16

N2 - Single-member plurality is often thought to facilitate a two-party system of alternating single-party majority government. However, no party secured an overall majority in the 2010 UK election, which was followed by the formation of the first peacetime coalition government since the 1930s. This article assesses whether this outcome was a one-off occurrence or was symptomatic of longer term changes in voting patterns in the UK that have reduced the likelihood of singe party majorities. To do so it charts trends in the level of third party support and representation, the incidence of marginal seats, and bias in the treatment of the two largest parties.

AB - Single-member plurality is often thought to facilitate a two-party system of alternating single-party majority government. However, no party secured an overall majority in the 2010 UK election, which was followed by the formation of the first peacetime coalition government since the 1930s. This article assesses whether this outcome was a one-off occurrence or was symptomatic of longer term changes in voting patterns in the UK that have reduced the likelihood of singe party majorities. To do so it charts trends in the level of third party support and representation, the incidence of marginal seats, and bias in the treatment of the two largest parties.

KW - electoral system

KW - UK elections

KW - voting behaviour

UR - http://www.amazon.co.uk/Britain-Hansard-Society-Politics-Government/dp/0199603278

M3 - Chapter

SN - 0199603278

BT - Britain Votes 2010

A2 - Geddes, Andrew

A2 - Tonge, Jonathan

CY - Oxford

ER -