So was it worth it? A commentary on Fricke et al. and Hagen et al. (2017).

Elspeth McCartney

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Abstract
Fricke et al. and Hagen et al. (2017) each report on large-scale pragmatic randomised controlled trials delivered in schools or nurseries, investigating language interventions for vulnerable children and showing moderate positive effect sizes. Such research is part of a recent development of 'what works' research in England, and the number of 'what works' trials continues to increase, largely through funding from the Sutton Trust, who are concerned with disadvantaged children, to the Educational Endowment Foundation (EEF). 'What works' research is not firmly accepted by all educationalists, however results of trials are now available quickly and presented in a manner intended to be accessible to practitioners. This development may facilitate principled decisions on the adoption of interventions by schools, as trials and their outcomes my be interrogated to support decisions on whether the anticipated impact is worth the cost of implementation.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 20 Jul 2017

Keywords

  • language intervention research
  • education
  • disadvantaged children

Cite this