Should we measure professionalism with an index? A note on theory and practice in state legislative professionalism research

Daniel C. Bowen, Zachary Greene

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)
155 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Legislative professionalism has played a prominent role in state politics research for decades. Despite the attention paid to its causes and consequences, recent research has largely set aside questions about professionalism’s conceptualization and operationalization. Usually measuring it as an aggregate index, scholars theoretically and empirically treat professionalism as a unidimensional concept. In this article, we argue that exclusive use of aggregate indices can limit state politics research. Using a new dataset with almost 40 years of data on state legislative resources, salary, and session length, we reconsider the validity of using an index to study professionalism across the states. We evaluate the internal consistency of professionalism components over time, the relationship between components and the Squire Index, and the degree to which professionalism components are unidimensional using classical multidimensional scaling. We find enough commonality and enough variation between professionalism components to support a range of measurement strategies like the use of unidimensional indices (such as the Squire Index), disaggregating the components and analyzing their effects individually, or formulating multidimensional measures. Scholars should take care to choose the appropriate measure of the concept that best fits the causal relationships under examination.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)277-296
Number of pages20
JournalState Politics and Policy Quarterly
Volume14
Issue number3
Early online date21 Jul 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2014

Fingerprint

politics
multidimensional scaling
operationalization
salary
professionalism
Professionalism
examination
cause
resources
time
Resources
Multidimensional Scaling
Length
Conceptualization
Salary
Causes
Operationalization
Causal

Keywords

  • state politics
  • legislative professionalism
  • legislative behavior
  • measurement
  • latent dimensional analysis

Cite this

@article{62f7558bbdde42248665fe1d2708c4c3,
title = "Should we measure professionalism with an index? A note on theory and practice in state legislative professionalism research",
abstract = "Legislative professionalism has played a prominent role in state politics research for decades. Despite the attention paid to its causes and consequences, recent research has largely set aside questions about professionalism’s conceptualization and operationalization. Usually measuring it as an aggregate index, scholars theoretically and empirically treat professionalism as a unidimensional concept. In this article, we argue that exclusive use of aggregate indices can limit state politics research. Using a new dataset with almost 40 years of data on state legislative resources, salary, and session length, we reconsider the validity of using an index to study professionalism across the states. We evaluate the internal consistency of professionalism components over time, the relationship between components and the Squire Index, and the degree to which professionalism components are unidimensional using classical multidimensional scaling. We find enough commonality and enough variation between professionalism components to support a range of measurement strategies like the use of unidimensional indices (such as the Squire Index), disaggregating the components and analyzing their effects individually, or formulating multidimensional measures. Scholars should take care to choose the appropriate measure of the concept that best fits the causal relationships under examination.",
keywords = "state politics, legislative professionalism, legislative behavior, measurement, latent dimensional analysis",
author = "Bowen, {Daniel C.} and Zachary Greene",
note = ".",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1177/1532440014536407",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "277--296",
journal = "State Politics and Policy Quarterly",
issn = "1532-4400",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Should we measure professionalism with an index? A note on theory and practice in state legislative professionalism research

AU - Bowen, Daniel C.

AU - Greene, Zachary

N1 - .

PY - 2014/9

Y1 - 2014/9

N2 - Legislative professionalism has played a prominent role in state politics research for decades. Despite the attention paid to its causes and consequences, recent research has largely set aside questions about professionalism’s conceptualization and operationalization. Usually measuring it as an aggregate index, scholars theoretically and empirically treat professionalism as a unidimensional concept. In this article, we argue that exclusive use of aggregate indices can limit state politics research. Using a new dataset with almost 40 years of data on state legislative resources, salary, and session length, we reconsider the validity of using an index to study professionalism across the states. We evaluate the internal consistency of professionalism components over time, the relationship between components and the Squire Index, and the degree to which professionalism components are unidimensional using classical multidimensional scaling. We find enough commonality and enough variation between professionalism components to support a range of measurement strategies like the use of unidimensional indices (such as the Squire Index), disaggregating the components and analyzing their effects individually, or formulating multidimensional measures. Scholars should take care to choose the appropriate measure of the concept that best fits the causal relationships under examination.

AB - Legislative professionalism has played a prominent role in state politics research for decades. Despite the attention paid to its causes and consequences, recent research has largely set aside questions about professionalism’s conceptualization and operationalization. Usually measuring it as an aggregate index, scholars theoretically and empirically treat professionalism as a unidimensional concept. In this article, we argue that exclusive use of aggregate indices can limit state politics research. Using a new dataset with almost 40 years of data on state legislative resources, salary, and session length, we reconsider the validity of using an index to study professionalism across the states. We evaluate the internal consistency of professionalism components over time, the relationship between components and the Squire Index, and the degree to which professionalism components are unidimensional using classical multidimensional scaling. We find enough commonality and enough variation between professionalism components to support a range of measurement strategies like the use of unidimensional indices (such as the Squire Index), disaggregating the components and analyzing their effects individually, or formulating multidimensional measures. Scholars should take care to choose the appropriate measure of the concept that best fits the causal relationships under examination.

KW - state politics

KW - legislative professionalism

KW - legislative behavior

KW - measurement

KW - latent dimensional analysis

UR - http://spa.sagepub.com/content/14/3/277

U2 - 10.1177/1532440014536407

DO - 10.1177/1532440014536407

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 277

EP - 296

JO - State Politics and Policy Quarterly

JF - State Politics and Policy Quarterly

SN - 1532-4400

IS - 3

ER -