Shadow writing and participant observation: a study of criminal justice social work around sentencing

Simon Halliday, Nicola Burns, Neil Hutton, F. McNeil, Cyrus Tata

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)
98 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The study of decision-making by public officials in administrative settings has been a mainstay of law and society scholarship for decades. The methodological challenges posed by this research agenda are well understood: how can socio-legal researchers get inside the heads of legal decision-makers in order to understand the uses of official discretion? This article describes an ethnographic technique the authors developed to help them penetrate the decision-making practices of criminal justice social workers in writing pre-sentence reports for the courts. This technique, called `shadow writing', involved a particular form of participant observation whereby the researcher mimicked the process of report writing in parallel with the social workers. By comparing these `shadow reports' with the real reports in a training-like setting, the social workers revealed in detail the subtleties of their communicative strategies embedded in particular reports and their sensibilities about report writing more generally.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)189-213
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Law and Society
Volume35
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2008

Keywords

  • criminal justice system
  • scots law
  • crime
  • sentencing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Shadow writing and participant observation: a study of criminal justice social work around sentencing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this