Seven Questions about Fracking in Scotland

Research output: Book/ReportOther report

Abstract

This IPPI Policy Brief is intended as a comment on what we view as the urgent need to improve on the quality of the ‘fracking debate’ that has been conducted in the public domain over the past year. Our argument is that, not only has the debate been somewhat polarised, but the questions raised and debated have been very narrowly focussed and lacking a wider contextual view. In particular, we argue that the issue needs to be set in terms of the broader question of ‘if we don’t get gas from shale, where do we get it from, and what are the alternatives?’, but also with the over-arching question of ‘what could fracking do for Scotland?’ We have identified seven questions that we believe must be answered in order for the process of consultation to come to a well-informed conclusion. We consider each of these in turn.
LanguageEnglish
Place of PublicationGlasgow
PublisherUniversity of Strathclyde
Commissioning bodyInternational Public Policy Institute
Number of pages13
Publication statusPublished - 20 Oct 2016

Publication series

NameInternational Public Policy Institute Policy Brief
PublisherUniversity of Strathclyde

Fingerprint

Hydraulic fracturing
Shale
Gases

Keywords

  • IPPI
  • fracking
  • fracking in Scotland

Cite this

Shipton, Z., & Turner, K. (2016). Seven Questions about Fracking in Scotland. (International Public Policy Institute Policy Brief). Glasgow: University of Strathclyde.
Shipton, Zoe ; Turner, Karen. / Seven Questions about Fracking in Scotland. Glasgow : University of Strathclyde, 2016. 13 p. (International Public Policy Institute Policy Brief).
@book{089c664b4a5244bbbd67ab8f991bf96e,
title = "Seven Questions about Fracking in Scotland",
abstract = "This IPPI Policy Brief is intended as a comment on what we view as the urgent need to improve on the quality of the ‘fracking debate’ that has been conducted in the public domain over the past year. Our argument is that, not only has the debate been somewhat polarised, but the questions raised and debated have been very narrowly focussed and lacking a wider contextual view. In particular, we argue that the issue needs to be set in terms of the broader question of ‘if we don’t get gas from shale, where do we get it from, and what are the alternatives?’, but also with the over-arching question of ‘what could fracking do for Scotland?’ We have identified seven questions that we believe must be answered in order for the process of consultation to come to a well-informed conclusion. We consider each of these in turn.",
keywords = "IPPI, fracking, fracking in Scotland",
author = "Zoe Shipton and Karen Turner",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "20",
language = "English",
series = "International Public Policy Institute Policy Brief",
publisher = "University of Strathclyde",

}

Shipton, Z & Turner, K 2016, Seven Questions about Fracking in Scotland. International Public Policy Institute Policy Brief, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow.

Seven Questions about Fracking in Scotland. / Shipton, Zoe; Turner, Karen.

Glasgow : University of Strathclyde, 2016. 13 p. (International Public Policy Institute Policy Brief).

Research output: Book/ReportOther report

TY - BOOK

T1 - Seven Questions about Fracking in Scotland

AU - Shipton, Zoe

AU - Turner, Karen

PY - 2016/10/20

Y1 - 2016/10/20

N2 - This IPPI Policy Brief is intended as a comment on what we view as the urgent need to improve on the quality of the ‘fracking debate’ that has been conducted in the public domain over the past year. Our argument is that, not only has the debate been somewhat polarised, but the questions raised and debated have been very narrowly focussed and lacking a wider contextual view. In particular, we argue that the issue needs to be set in terms of the broader question of ‘if we don’t get gas from shale, where do we get it from, and what are the alternatives?’, but also with the over-arching question of ‘what could fracking do for Scotland?’ We have identified seven questions that we believe must be answered in order for the process of consultation to come to a well-informed conclusion. We consider each of these in turn.

AB - This IPPI Policy Brief is intended as a comment on what we view as the urgent need to improve on the quality of the ‘fracking debate’ that has been conducted in the public domain over the past year. Our argument is that, not only has the debate been somewhat polarised, but the questions raised and debated have been very narrowly focussed and lacking a wider contextual view. In particular, we argue that the issue needs to be set in terms of the broader question of ‘if we don’t get gas from shale, where do we get it from, and what are the alternatives?’, but also with the over-arching question of ‘what could fracking do for Scotland?’ We have identified seven questions that we believe must be answered in order for the process of consultation to come to a well-informed conclusion. We consider each of these in turn.

KW - IPPI

KW - fracking

KW - fracking in Scotland

M3 - Other report

T3 - International Public Policy Institute Policy Brief

BT - Seven Questions about Fracking in Scotland

PB - University of Strathclyde

CY - Glasgow

ER -

Shipton Z, Turner K. Seven Questions about Fracking in Scotland. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde, 2016. 13 p. (International Public Policy Institute Policy Brief).