Serving multiple stakeholders: issues arising from a major national evaluation study

Bridget Somekh, Joanna McPake, John Hall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper provides an analysis of the issues arising from work with multiple stakeholders within the context of a major national evaluation study. The context is the UK Education Departments' Superhighways Initiative (EDSI), which was jointly funded by the four education departments of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. Unusually, the evaluation, which was large scale and employed several teams of evaluators, had a real opportunity to inform the development of policy. Problems of working for multiple stakeholders arose from the tight control that the sponsors exercised over the structure, style and content of the report. In addition to the usual problems of conflicting interests between stakeholders, the Scottish evaluators experienced problems relating to the polarised political context in the UK prior to the general election of 1997. The successful public relations exercise that created the EDSI programme, with commercial sponsorship for projects and government funding only for the evaluation, was an additional factor in determining the evaluators' roles and relationships with stakeholders.

LanguageEnglish
Pages261-278
Number of pages18
JournalEducation and Information Technologies
Volume4
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 1999

Fingerprint

stakeholder
superhighway
evaluation
education
sponsorship
election
funding

Keywords

  • evaluation
  • information and communication technology
  • methodology
  • policy analysis
  • user-oriented

Cite this

@article{c5e9ffb20f384372996fde90bd2ef62f,
title = "Serving multiple stakeholders: issues arising from a major national evaluation study",
abstract = "This paper provides an analysis of the issues arising from work with multiple stakeholders within the context of a major national evaluation study. The context is the UK Education Departments' Superhighways Initiative (EDSI), which was jointly funded by the four education departments of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. Unusually, the evaluation, which was large scale and employed several teams of evaluators, had a real opportunity to inform the development of policy. Problems of working for multiple stakeholders arose from the tight control that the sponsors exercised over the structure, style and content of the report. In addition to the usual problems of conflicting interests between stakeholders, the Scottish evaluators experienced problems relating to the polarised political context in the UK prior to the general election of 1997. The successful public relations exercise that created the EDSI programme, with commercial sponsorship for projects and government funding only for the evaluation, was an additional factor in determining the evaluators' roles and relationships with stakeholders.",
keywords = "evaluation, information and communication technology, methodology, policy analysis, user-oriented",
author = "Bridget Somekh and Joanna McPake and John Hall",
year = "1999",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1023/A:1009640109517",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "261--278",
journal = "Education and Information Technologies",
issn = "1360-2357",
number = "3",

}

Serving multiple stakeholders : issues arising from a major national evaluation study. / Somekh, Bridget; McPake, Joanna; Hall, John.

In: Education and Information Technologies, Vol. 4, No. 3, 01.12.1999, p. 261-278.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Serving multiple stakeholders

T2 - Education and Information Technologies

AU - Somekh, Bridget

AU - McPake, Joanna

AU - Hall, John

PY - 1999/12/1

Y1 - 1999/12/1

N2 - This paper provides an analysis of the issues arising from work with multiple stakeholders within the context of a major national evaluation study. The context is the UK Education Departments' Superhighways Initiative (EDSI), which was jointly funded by the four education departments of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. Unusually, the evaluation, which was large scale and employed several teams of evaluators, had a real opportunity to inform the development of policy. Problems of working for multiple stakeholders arose from the tight control that the sponsors exercised over the structure, style and content of the report. In addition to the usual problems of conflicting interests between stakeholders, the Scottish evaluators experienced problems relating to the polarised political context in the UK prior to the general election of 1997. The successful public relations exercise that created the EDSI programme, with commercial sponsorship for projects and government funding only for the evaluation, was an additional factor in determining the evaluators' roles and relationships with stakeholders.

AB - This paper provides an analysis of the issues arising from work with multiple stakeholders within the context of a major national evaluation study. The context is the UK Education Departments' Superhighways Initiative (EDSI), which was jointly funded by the four education departments of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. Unusually, the evaluation, which was large scale and employed several teams of evaluators, had a real opportunity to inform the development of policy. Problems of working for multiple stakeholders arose from the tight control that the sponsors exercised over the structure, style and content of the report. In addition to the usual problems of conflicting interests between stakeholders, the Scottish evaluators experienced problems relating to the polarised political context in the UK prior to the general election of 1997. The successful public relations exercise that created the EDSI programme, with commercial sponsorship for projects and government funding only for the evaluation, was an additional factor in determining the evaluators' roles and relationships with stakeholders.

KW - evaluation

KW - information and communication technology

KW - methodology

KW - policy analysis

KW - user-oriented

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=53149117471&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/A:1009640109517

DO - 10.1023/A:1009640109517

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 261

EP - 278

JO - Education and Information Technologies

JF - Education and Information Technologies

SN - 1360-2357

IS - 3

ER -