Sentencing, rationality, and computer-technology

N. Hutton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A number of jurisdictions have recently begun to employ computer technology to provide support for sentencers. This essay reviews these projects and discusses how the use of computers fits into our understanding of sentencing as a decision-making process. While most work on sentencing has been written from a moral philosophical or legal perspective,' this essay examines sentenc- ing2 from a sociological perspective. In order to address the possible impact of computer technology on sentencing, it is necessary to examine sentencing as a decision-making process carried out by social actors in a social setting. There has been very little research in this area. Important empirical studies3 have tried to explain how social psychological factors influence sentencers' decisions. There is also a tradition which identifies disparity in sentencing4 but this work does not explain how disparity is produced by the social practice of sentencing. This essay seeks to map out some more general concepts which help understand sentencing as a social process.
LanguageEnglish
Pages549-570
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Law and Society
Volume22
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1995

Fingerprint

rationality
decision-making process
psychological factors
social actor
social process
jurisdiction

Keywords

  • sentencing
  • computer technology
  • law

Cite this

Hutton, N. / Sentencing, rationality, and computer-technology. In: Journal of Law and Society. 1995 ; Vol. 22, No. 4. pp. 549-570.
@article{7c035dafd6834cdc9b3095f69779852f,
title = "Sentencing, rationality, and computer-technology",
abstract = "A number of jurisdictions have recently begun to employ computer technology to provide support for sentencers. This essay reviews these projects and discusses how the use of computers fits into our understanding of sentencing as a decision-making process. While most work on sentencing has been written from a moral philosophical or legal perspective,' this essay examines sentenc- ing2 from a sociological perspective. In order to address the possible impact of computer technology on sentencing, it is necessary to examine sentencing as a decision-making process carried out by social actors in a social setting. There has been very little research in this area. Important empirical studies3 have tried to explain how social psychological factors influence sentencers' decisions. There is also a tradition which identifies disparity in sentencing4 but this work does not explain how disparity is produced by the social practice of sentencing. This essay seeks to map out some more general concepts which help understand sentencing as a social process.",
keywords = "sentencing, computer technology, law",
author = "N. Hutton",
year = "1995",
month = "12",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "549--570",
journal = "Journal of Law and Society",
issn = "0263-323X",
number = "4",

}

Sentencing, rationality, and computer-technology. / Hutton, N.

In: Journal of Law and Society, Vol. 22, No. 4, 12.1995, p. 549-570.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sentencing, rationality, and computer-technology

AU - Hutton, N.

PY - 1995/12

Y1 - 1995/12

N2 - A number of jurisdictions have recently begun to employ computer technology to provide support for sentencers. This essay reviews these projects and discusses how the use of computers fits into our understanding of sentencing as a decision-making process. While most work on sentencing has been written from a moral philosophical or legal perspective,' this essay examines sentenc- ing2 from a sociological perspective. In order to address the possible impact of computer technology on sentencing, it is necessary to examine sentencing as a decision-making process carried out by social actors in a social setting. There has been very little research in this area. Important empirical studies3 have tried to explain how social psychological factors influence sentencers' decisions. There is also a tradition which identifies disparity in sentencing4 but this work does not explain how disparity is produced by the social practice of sentencing. This essay seeks to map out some more general concepts which help understand sentencing as a social process.

AB - A number of jurisdictions have recently begun to employ computer technology to provide support for sentencers. This essay reviews these projects and discusses how the use of computers fits into our understanding of sentencing as a decision-making process. While most work on sentencing has been written from a moral philosophical or legal perspective,' this essay examines sentenc- ing2 from a sociological perspective. In order to address the possible impact of computer technology on sentencing, it is necessary to examine sentencing as a decision-making process carried out by social actors in a social setting. There has been very little research in this area. Important empirical studies3 have tried to explain how social psychological factors influence sentencers' decisions. There is also a tradition which identifies disparity in sentencing4 but this work does not explain how disparity is produced by the social practice of sentencing. This essay seeks to map out some more general concepts which help understand sentencing as a social process.

KW - sentencing

KW - computer technology

KW - law

UR - http://www.jstor.org/stable/1410614

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 549

EP - 570

JO - Journal of Law and Society

T2 - Journal of Law and Society

JF - Journal of Law and Society

SN - 0263-323X

IS - 4

ER -