Selection of organic substrates as potential reactive materials for use in a denitrification permeable reactive barrier (PRB)

Oriol Gibert, Sywia Pomierny, Ivan Rowe, Robert M. Kalin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

125 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to select a suitable natural organic substrate as a potential carbon source for use in a denitrification permeable reactive barrier (PRB). A number of seven organic substrates were first tested in batch tests. The materials attained varying degrees of success at promoting denitrification. Some of the organic substrates performed very well, achieving complete nitrate removal (>98%), while others were considered unsuitable for a variety of reasons, including: insufficient nitrate or nitrogen removal, excessive release of leachable nitrogen from the substrate or excessive reduction of nitrate to ammonium rather than removing it as gaseous N2. The top performing substrate in terms of denitrification extent (>98%) and rate () was then selected for two bench-scale column experiments in an attempt to simulate the PRB. The inlet concentration was 50 mg dm−3 and the columns operated at two different flow rates: 0.3 cm3 min−1 (Column 1) and 1.1 cm3 min−1 (Column 2). The two columns showed different general patterns, making it clear that the flow rate was a key factor at the nitrate removal. Nitrate was completely removed (>96%) by the passage through Column 1, while only partially removed in Column 2 (66%). The results indicated that the selected organic substrate (Softwood) was applicable for further use as a filling material for a PRB.
LanguageEnglish
Pages7587-7596
Number of pages10
JournalBioresource Technology
Volume99
Issue number16
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

reactive barrier
Denitrification
denitrification
Nitrates
substrate
Substrates
nitrate
Flow rate
Nitrogen removal
Softwoods
Ammonium Compounds
nitrogen
material
Nitrogen
Carbon
ammonium
carbon

Keywords

  • denitrification
  • groundwater nitrate
  • permeable reactive barrier
  • passive remediation
  • organic substrate

Cite this

@article{6684b31c71424d5c9d79b74395524d4b,
title = "Selection of organic substrates as potential reactive materials for use in a denitrification permeable reactive barrier (PRB)",
abstract = "The aim of the present study was to select a suitable natural organic substrate as a potential carbon source for use in a denitrification permeable reactive barrier (PRB). A number of seven organic substrates were first tested in batch tests. The materials attained varying degrees of success at promoting denitrification. Some of the organic substrates performed very well, achieving complete nitrate removal (>98{\%}), while others were considered unsuitable for a variety of reasons, including: insufficient nitrate or nitrogen removal, excessive release of leachable nitrogen from the substrate or excessive reduction of nitrate to ammonium rather than removing it as gaseous N2. The top performing substrate in terms of denitrification extent (>98{\%}) and rate () was then selected for two bench-scale column experiments in an attempt to simulate the PRB. The inlet concentration was 50 mg dm−3 and the columns operated at two different flow rates: 0.3 cm3 min−1 (Column 1) and 1.1 cm3 min−1 (Column 2). The two columns showed different general patterns, making it clear that the flow rate was a key factor at the nitrate removal. Nitrate was completely removed (>96{\%}) by the passage through Column 1, while only partially removed in Column 2 (66{\%}). The results indicated that the selected organic substrate (Softwood) was applicable for further use as a filling material for a PRB.",
keywords = "denitrification, groundwater nitrate, permeable reactive barrier, passive remediation, organic substrate",
author = "Oriol Gibert and Sywia Pomierny and Ivan Rowe and Kalin, {Robert M.}",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1016/j.biortech.2008.02.012",
language = "English",
volume = "99",
pages = "7587--7596",
journal = "Bioresource Technology",
issn = "0960-8524",
number = "16",

}

Selection of organic substrates as potential reactive materials for use in a denitrification permeable reactive barrier (PRB). / Gibert, Oriol; Pomierny, Sywia; Rowe, Ivan; Kalin, Robert M.

In: Bioresource Technology, Vol. 99, No. 16, 2008, p. 7587-7596.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Selection of organic substrates as potential reactive materials for use in a denitrification permeable reactive barrier (PRB)

AU - Gibert, Oriol

AU - Pomierny, Sywia

AU - Rowe, Ivan

AU - Kalin, Robert M.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - The aim of the present study was to select a suitable natural organic substrate as a potential carbon source for use in a denitrification permeable reactive barrier (PRB). A number of seven organic substrates were first tested in batch tests. The materials attained varying degrees of success at promoting denitrification. Some of the organic substrates performed very well, achieving complete nitrate removal (>98%), while others were considered unsuitable for a variety of reasons, including: insufficient nitrate or nitrogen removal, excessive release of leachable nitrogen from the substrate or excessive reduction of nitrate to ammonium rather than removing it as gaseous N2. The top performing substrate in terms of denitrification extent (>98%) and rate () was then selected for two bench-scale column experiments in an attempt to simulate the PRB. The inlet concentration was 50 mg dm−3 and the columns operated at two different flow rates: 0.3 cm3 min−1 (Column 1) and 1.1 cm3 min−1 (Column 2). The two columns showed different general patterns, making it clear that the flow rate was a key factor at the nitrate removal. Nitrate was completely removed (>96%) by the passage through Column 1, while only partially removed in Column 2 (66%). The results indicated that the selected organic substrate (Softwood) was applicable for further use as a filling material for a PRB.

AB - The aim of the present study was to select a suitable natural organic substrate as a potential carbon source for use in a denitrification permeable reactive barrier (PRB). A number of seven organic substrates were first tested in batch tests. The materials attained varying degrees of success at promoting denitrification. Some of the organic substrates performed very well, achieving complete nitrate removal (>98%), while others were considered unsuitable for a variety of reasons, including: insufficient nitrate or nitrogen removal, excessive release of leachable nitrogen from the substrate or excessive reduction of nitrate to ammonium rather than removing it as gaseous N2. The top performing substrate in terms of denitrification extent (>98%) and rate () was then selected for two bench-scale column experiments in an attempt to simulate the PRB. The inlet concentration was 50 mg dm−3 and the columns operated at two different flow rates: 0.3 cm3 min−1 (Column 1) and 1.1 cm3 min−1 (Column 2). The two columns showed different general patterns, making it clear that the flow rate was a key factor at the nitrate removal. Nitrate was completely removed (>96%) by the passage through Column 1, while only partially removed in Column 2 (66%). The results indicated that the selected organic substrate (Softwood) was applicable for further use as a filling material for a PRB.

KW - denitrification

KW - groundwater nitrate

KW - permeable reactive barrier

KW - passive remediation

KW - organic substrate

U2 - 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.02.012

DO - 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.02.012

M3 - Article

VL - 99

SP - 7587

EP - 7596

JO - Bioresource Technology

T2 - Bioresource Technology

JF - Bioresource Technology

SN - 0960-8524

IS - 16

ER -