Seismic network design to detect felt ground motions from induced seismicity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Human activities, such as fluid injection as part of the stimulation of an enhanced geothermal system (EGS) for heat and power production, can cause damaging earthquake ground motions. A difficulty in quickly settling or rejecting insurance claims to the policy of the EGS operator is the lack of ground truth on the observed shaking at sites of reported damage. To overcome this problem a local seismic network could be installed prior to injection to constrain the ground-motion field at points of potential damage. Since the installation and maintenance of seismometers are costly there is an incentive to keep the number of instruments to a minimum. In this short communication, ground-motion fields are simulated and receiver operating characteristic analysis is conducted to guide decisions on the number of sensors required to obtain a certain confidence in the rate of false alarms and missed detections. For densities of 10-20 instruments per km2 the ability to estimate potentially damaging ground motions is reasonable but associated with a significant chance of missed detections and false alarms. If an EGS operator or regulatory authority does not want to accept such chances then network densities of 50-100 instruments per km2 are required and even in this case the exceedance/non-exceedance of a certain ground-motion threshold cannot be completely constrained.

LanguageEnglish
Pages193-197
Number of pages5
JournalSoil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Volume48
Early online date5 Mar 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2013

Fingerprint

induced seismicity
network design
ground motion
injection
insurance
earthquakes
Seismographs
sensors (equipment)
Insurance
heat
Earthquakes
fluid injection
damage
seismograph
Fluids
Communication
Sensors
incentive
human activity
Induced Seismicity

Keywords

  • fluid injection
  • enhanced geothermal system
  • seismometer maintenance
  • ground-motion

Cite this

@article{d73c19a3baf3431d866f804ce118b34b,
title = "Seismic network design to detect felt ground motions from induced seismicity",
abstract = "Human activities, such as fluid injection as part of the stimulation of an enhanced geothermal system (EGS) for heat and power production, can cause damaging earthquake ground motions. A difficulty in quickly settling or rejecting insurance claims to the policy of the EGS operator is the lack of ground truth on the observed shaking at sites of reported damage. To overcome this problem a local seismic network could be installed prior to injection to constrain the ground-motion field at points of potential damage. Since the installation and maintenance of seismometers are costly there is an incentive to keep the number of instruments to a minimum. In this short communication, ground-motion fields are simulated and receiver operating characteristic analysis is conducted to guide decisions on the number of sensors required to obtain a certain confidence in the rate of false alarms and missed detections. For densities of 10-20 instruments per km2 the ability to estimate potentially damaging ground motions is reasonable but associated with a significant chance of missed detections and false alarms. If an EGS operator or regulatory authority does not want to accept such chances then network densities of 50-100 instruments per km2 are required and even in this case the exceedance/non-exceedance of a certain ground-motion threshold cannot be completely constrained.",
keywords = "fluid injection, enhanced geothermal system, seismometer maintenance, ground-motion",
author = "John Douglas",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.01.030",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "193--197",
journal = "Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering",
issn = "0267-7261",

}

Seismic network design to detect felt ground motions from induced seismicity. / Douglas, John.

In: Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 48, 05.2013, p. 193-197.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Seismic network design to detect felt ground motions from induced seismicity

AU - Douglas, John

PY - 2013/5

Y1 - 2013/5

N2 - Human activities, such as fluid injection as part of the stimulation of an enhanced geothermal system (EGS) for heat and power production, can cause damaging earthquake ground motions. A difficulty in quickly settling or rejecting insurance claims to the policy of the EGS operator is the lack of ground truth on the observed shaking at sites of reported damage. To overcome this problem a local seismic network could be installed prior to injection to constrain the ground-motion field at points of potential damage. Since the installation and maintenance of seismometers are costly there is an incentive to keep the number of instruments to a minimum. In this short communication, ground-motion fields are simulated and receiver operating characteristic analysis is conducted to guide decisions on the number of sensors required to obtain a certain confidence in the rate of false alarms and missed detections. For densities of 10-20 instruments per km2 the ability to estimate potentially damaging ground motions is reasonable but associated with a significant chance of missed detections and false alarms. If an EGS operator or regulatory authority does not want to accept such chances then network densities of 50-100 instruments per km2 are required and even in this case the exceedance/non-exceedance of a certain ground-motion threshold cannot be completely constrained.

AB - Human activities, such as fluid injection as part of the stimulation of an enhanced geothermal system (EGS) for heat and power production, can cause damaging earthquake ground motions. A difficulty in quickly settling or rejecting insurance claims to the policy of the EGS operator is the lack of ground truth on the observed shaking at sites of reported damage. To overcome this problem a local seismic network could be installed prior to injection to constrain the ground-motion field at points of potential damage. Since the installation and maintenance of seismometers are costly there is an incentive to keep the number of instruments to a minimum. In this short communication, ground-motion fields are simulated and receiver operating characteristic analysis is conducted to guide decisions on the number of sensors required to obtain a certain confidence in the rate of false alarms and missed detections. For densities of 10-20 instruments per km2 the ability to estimate potentially damaging ground motions is reasonable but associated with a significant chance of missed detections and false alarms. If an EGS operator or regulatory authority does not want to accept such chances then network densities of 50-100 instruments per km2 are required and even in this case the exceedance/non-exceedance of a certain ground-motion threshold cannot be completely constrained.

KW - fluid injection

KW - enhanced geothermal system

KW - seismometer maintenance

KW - ground-motion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874714615&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.01.030

DO - 10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.01.030

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 193

EP - 197

JO - Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

T2 - Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

JF - Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

SN - 0267-7261

ER -