Security at the source: embedding journalists as a superior strategy to military censorship

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this article is to evaluate the merits and pitfalls of the Pentagon's embed programme during the Iraq war. An in-depth analysis of the structure, purpose and practice of embedding allows an assessment of the changes in media treatment that embedding produces in comparison with previous military campaigns. While embedding journalists increases access and reduces censorship, their integration as individuals into military units makes them adapt, internalize military logic, and empathize with troops. Embedding can benefit both sides, military and media, and help to improve their historically troublesome relationship. The danger of embedding lies in its ingenuity: by satisfying their professional and economic needs and demands, journalists and media organizations can effectively be co-opted. Ultimately, the paper questions the notion that decreases in censorship and increases in access necessarily and invariably guarantee freedom of the press.
LanguageEnglish
Pages948-963
Number of pages16
JournalJournalism Studies
Volume8
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Fingerprint

censorship
journalist
Military
Economics
freedom of the press
Iraq
guarantee
campaign
economics

Keywords

  • journalism
  • journalism studies

Cite this

@article{5f10b0505fce4294adfbb13b6891908b,
title = "Security at the source: embedding journalists as a superior strategy to military censorship",
abstract = "The aim of this article is to evaluate the merits and pitfalls of the Pentagon's embed programme during the Iraq war. An in-depth analysis of the structure, purpose and practice of embedding allows an assessment of the changes in media treatment that embedding produces in comparison with previous military campaigns. While embedding journalists increases access and reduces censorship, their integration as individuals into military units makes them adapt, internalize military logic, and empathize with troops. Embedding can benefit both sides, military and media, and help to improve their historically troublesome relationship. The danger of embedding lies in its ingenuity: by satisfying their professional and economic needs and demands, journalists and media organizations can effectively be co-opted. Ultimately, the paper questions the notion that decreases in censorship and increases in access necessarily and invariably guarantee freedom of the press.",
keywords = "journalism, journalism studies",
author = "Heinz Brandenburg",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1080/14616700701556120",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "948--963",
journal = "Journalism Studies",
issn = "1461-670X",
number = "6",

}

Security at the source: embedding journalists as a superior strategy to military censorship. / Brandenburg, Heinz.

In: Journalism Studies, Vol. 8, No. 6, 2007, p. 948-963.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Security at the source: embedding journalists as a superior strategy to military censorship

AU - Brandenburg, Heinz

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - The aim of this article is to evaluate the merits and pitfalls of the Pentagon's embed programme during the Iraq war. An in-depth analysis of the structure, purpose and practice of embedding allows an assessment of the changes in media treatment that embedding produces in comparison with previous military campaigns. While embedding journalists increases access and reduces censorship, their integration as individuals into military units makes them adapt, internalize military logic, and empathize with troops. Embedding can benefit both sides, military and media, and help to improve their historically troublesome relationship. The danger of embedding lies in its ingenuity: by satisfying their professional and economic needs and demands, journalists and media organizations can effectively be co-opted. Ultimately, the paper questions the notion that decreases in censorship and increases in access necessarily and invariably guarantee freedom of the press.

AB - The aim of this article is to evaluate the merits and pitfalls of the Pentagon's embed programme during the Iraq war. An in-depth analysis of the structure, purpose and practice of embedding allows an assessment of the changes in media treatment that embedding produces in comparison with previous military campaigns. While embedding journalists increases access and reduces censorship, their integration as individuals into military units makes them adapt, internalize military logic, and empathize with troops. Embedding can benefit both sides, military and media, and help to improve their historically troublesome relationship. The danger of embedding lies in its ingenuity: by satisfying their professional and economic needs and demands, journalists and media organizations can effectively be co-opted. Ultimately, the paper questions the notion that decreases in censorship and increases in access necessarily and invariably guarantee freedom of the press.

KW - journalism

KW - journalism studies

U2 - 10.1080/14616700701556120

DO - 10.1080/14616700701556120

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 948

EP - 963

JO - Journalism Studies

T2 - Journalism Studies

JF - Journalism Studies

SN - 1461-670X

IS - 6

ER -