Securing effective and equitable coverage of marine protected areas

the UK's progress towards achieving Convention on Biological Diversity commitments and lessons learned for the way forward

David E. Johnson, Siân E. Rees, Daniela Diz, Peter J.S. Jones, Callum Roberts, Christopher Barrio Froján

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Current international agreements call for protecting 10% of marine and coastal waters by 2020, with the intention of increasing that target to 30% by 2030. With 24% of its territorial waters protected, the UK falls short of the new expected target. As well as quantitative targets, qualitative criteria have been internationally agreed for protected area designation, including minimum coverage values and characteristics that encompass effectively and equitably managed, ecologically representative and well-connected systems of protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures, and integrated into the wider landscape and seascape. The legal framework supporting protected area designations at sea is summarized and explained for UK territorial waters. Efforts to date to achieve current marine protected area (MPA) targets are reviewed, with emphasis on how well the existing protected area portfolio captures the qualitative criteria. Examples are given of other effective conservation measures complementary to formalized MPAs, especially with regard to achieving and promoting qualitative criteria for biodiversity conservation, including appropriate recognition of and support for areas conserved by indigenous people, local communities and private entities. A precis on the governance of MPAs and other effective conservation measures in the UK and its overseas territories is presented. Whilst the UK has made exceptional progress with quantitative MPA coverage, it is still not clear whether designated areas offer effective protection. A UK-level strategy is in place to address this; and at site level, Lyme Bay MPA illustrates the benefits of addressing qualitative criteria. Illustrated by the UK example, an urgent call is made for ongoing and future marine in situ area-based conservation efforts to substantiate quantitative and qualitative considerations, and to ensure that MPA networks are ultimately fit for purpose.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)181-194
Number of pages14
JournalAquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
Volume29
Issue numberS2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Oct 2019

Fingerprint

protected area
conservation areas
biodiversity
international agreements
international agreement
indigenous peoples
convention
governance
coastal water
legislation
water

Keywords

  • Aichi Biodiversity Target 11
  • area-based management tools
  • other effective conservation measures
  • UN sustainable development goals

Cite this

@article{ec031742a4c0451f9f14a98a3ed6a91b,
title = "Securing effective and equitable coverage of marine protected areas: the UK's progress towards achieving Convention on Biological Diversity commitments and lessons learned for the way forward",
abstract = "Current international agreements call for protecting 10{\%} of marine and coastal waters by 2020, with the intention of increasing that target to 30{\%} by 2030. With 24{\%} of its territorial waters protected, the UK falls short of the new expected target. As well as quantitative targets, qualitative criteria have been internationally agreed for protected area designation, including minimum coverage values and characteristics that encompass effectively and equitably managed, ecologically representative and well-connected systems of protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures, and integrated into the wider landscape and seascape. The legal framework supporting protected area designations at sea is summarized and explained for UK territorial waters. Efforts to date to achieve current marine protected area (MPA) targets are reviewed, with emphasis on how well the existing protected area portfolio captures the qualitative criteria. Examples are given of other effective conservation measures complementary to formalized MPAs, especially with regard to achieving and promoting qualitative criteria for biodiversity conservation, including appropriate recognition of and support for areas conserved by indigenous people, local communities and private entities. A precis on the governance of MPAs and other effective conservation measures in the UK and its overseas territories is presented. Whilst the UK has made exceptional progress with quantitative MPA coverage, it is still not clear whether designated areas offer effective protection. A UK-level strategy is in place to address this; and at site level, Lyme Bay MPA illustrates the benefits of addressing qualitative criteria. Illustrated by the UK example, an urgent call is made for ongoing and future marine in situ area-based conservation efforts to substantiate quantitative and qualitative considerations, and to ensure that MPA networks are ultimately fit for purpose.",
keywords = "Aichi Biodiversity Target 11, area-based management tools, other effective conservation measures, UN sustainable development goals",
author = "Johnson, {David E.} and Rees, {Si{\^a}n E.} and Daniela Diz and Jones, {Peter J.S.} and Callum Roberts and Froj{\'a}n, {Christopher Barrio}",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1002/aqc.3065",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "181--194",
journal = "Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems",
issn = "1052-7613",
number = "S2",

}

Securing effective and equitable coverage of marine protected areas : the UK's progress towards achieving Convention on Biological Diversity commitments and lessons learned for the way forward. / Johnson, David E.; Rees, Siân E.; Diz, Daniela; Jones, Peter J.S.; Roberts, Callum; Froján, Christopher Barrio.

In: Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems , Vol. 29, No. S2, 21.10.2019, p. 181-194.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Securing effective and equitable coverage of marine protected areas

T2 - the UK's progress towards achieving Convention on Biological Diversity commitments and lessons learned for the way forward

AU - Johnson, David E.

AU - Rees, Siân E.

AU - Diz, Daniela

AU - Jones, Peter J.S.

AU - Roberts, Callum

AU - Froján, Christopher Barrio

PY - 2019/10/21

Y1 - 2019/10/21

N2 - Current international agreements call for protecting 10% of marine and coastal waters by 2020, with the intention of increasing that target to 30% by 2030. With 24% of its territorial waters protected, the UK falls short of the new expected target. As well as quantitative targets, qualitative criteria have been internationally agreed for protected area designation, including minimum coverage values and characteristics that encompass effectively and equitably managed, ecologically representative and well-connected systems of protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures, and integrated into the wider landscape and seascape. The legal framework supporting protected area designations at sea is summarized and explained for UK territorial waters. Efforts to date to achieve current marine protected area (MPA) targets are reviewed, with emphasis on how well the existing protected area portfolio captures the qualitative criteria. Examples are given of other effective conservation measures complementary to formalized MPAs, especially with regard to achieving and promoting qualitative criteria for biodiversity conservation, including appropriate recognition of and support for areas conserved by indigenous people, local communities and private entities. A precis on the governance of MPAs and other effective conservation measures in the UK and its overseas territories is presented. Whilst the UK has made exceptional progress with quantitative MPA coverage, it is still not clear whether designated areas offer effective protection. A UK-level strategy is in place to address this; and at site level, Lyme Bay MPA illustrates the benefits of addressing qualitative criteria. Illustrated by the UK example, an urgent call is made for ongoing and future marine in situ area-based conservation efforts to substantiate quantitative and qualitative considerations, and to ensure that MPA networks are ultimately fit for purpose.

AB - Current international agreements call for protecting 10% of marine and coastal waters by 2020, with the intention of increasing that target to 30% by 2030. With 24% of its territorial waters protected, the UK falls short of the new expected target. As well as quantitative targets, qualitative criteria have been internationally agreed for protected area designation, including minimum coverage values and characteristics that encompass effectively and equitably managed, ecologically representative and well-connected systems of protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures, and integrated into the wider landscape and seascape. The legal framework supporting protected area designations at sea is summarized and explained for UK territorial waters. Efforts to date to achieve current marine protected area (MPA) targets are reviewed, with emphasis on how well the existing protected area portfolio captures the qualitative criteria. Examples are given of other effective conservation measures complementary to formalized MPAs, especially with regard to achieving and promoting qualitative criteria for biodiversity conservation, including appropriate recognition of and support for areas conserved by indigenous people, local communities and private entities. A precis on the governance of MPAs and other effective conservation measures in the UK and its overseas territories is presented. Whilst the UK has made exceptional progress with quantitative MPA coverage, it is still not clear whether designated areas offer effective protection. A UK-level strategy is in place to address this; and at site level, Lyme Bay MPA illustrates the benefits of addressing qualitative criteria. Illustrated by the UK example, an urgent call is made for ongoing and future marine in situ area-based conservation efforts to substantiate quantitative and qualitative considerations, and to ensure that MPA networks are ultimately fit for purpose.

KW - Aichi Biodiversity Target 11

KW - area-based management tools

KW - other effective conservation measures

KW - UN sustainable development goals

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073679430&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/aqc.3065

DO - 10.1002/aqc.3065

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 181

EP - 194

JO - Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems

JF - Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems

SN - 1052-7613

IS - S2

ER -