Sectoral patterns of small firms innovation, networking and proximity

M. Freel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

357 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Drawing upon a sample of 597 small and medium-sized manufacturing firms, this article investigates the extent to which cooperation for innovation is associated with firm-level product and process 'innovativeness' and, where collaborative relationships are reported, the factors which influence their spatial distribution. With respect to the former issue, the data suggests considerable variety of association across Pavitt's [Research Policy 13 (1994) 343] sectoral taxonomy and innovation type. However, the data also indicates the need for caution when developing network strategies or policies: the evidence presented here is unequivocal in noting that innovation is neither a necessary nor less a sufficient condition for innovation. Moreover, internal resources often act as complements to, or indeed appears to negate the need for, external resources. With regards to the spatial distribution of firm linkages, it appears that increasing firms size and export propensity are positively associated with external linkages at a higher spatial level. Moreover, the spatial reach of innovation-related linkages is also likely to be greater for firms reporting the introduction of relatively novel innovations (i.e. products or processes which are new to the industry). In contrast, smaller firms and firms engaged in incremental product innovations appear more likely to be locally embedded.
LanguageEnglish
Pages751-770
Number of pages19
JournalResearch Policy
Volume32
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Fingerprint

Innovation
Spatial distribution
Taxonomies
Proximity
Small firms
Networking
Industry
Product innovation
Resources
Linkage

Keywords

  • innovation
  • small firms
  • external linkages
  • embeddedness
  • entrepreneurship

Cite this

@article{bb2fc783efe746c1893f0ac8ff96a1ea,
title = "Sectoral patterns of small firms innovation, networking and proximity",
abstract = "Drawing upon a sample of 597 small and medium-sized manufacturing firms, this article investigates the extent to which cooperation for innovation is associated with firm-level product and process 'innovativeness' and, where collaborative relationships are reported, the factors which influence their spatial distribution. With respect to the former issue, the data suggests considerable variety of association across Pavitt's [Research Policy 13 (1994) 343] sectoral taxonomy and innovation type. However, the data also indicates the need for caution when developing network strategies or policies: the evidence presented here is unequivocal in noting that innovation is neither a necessary nor less a sufficient condition for innovation. Moreover, internal resources often act as complements to, or indeed appears to negate the need for, external resources. With regards to the spatial distribution of firm linkages, it appears that increasing firms size and export propensity are positively associated with external linkages at a higher spatial level. Moreover, the spatial reach of innovation-related linkages is also likely to be greater for firms reporting the introduction of relatively novel innovations (i.e. products or processes which are new to the industry). In contrast, smaller firms and firms engaged in incremental product innovations appear more likely to be locally embedded.",
keywords = "innovation, small firms, external linkages, embeddedness, entrepreneurship",
author = "M. Freel",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00084-7",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "751--770",
journal = "Research Policy",
issn = "0048-7333",
number = "5",

}

Sectoral patterns of small firms innovation, networking and proximity. / Freel, M.

In: Research Policy, Vol. 32, No. 5, 2003, p. 751-770.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sectoral patterns of small firms innovation, networking and proximity

AU - Freel, M.

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Drawing upon a sample of 597 small and medium-sized manufacturing firms, this article investigates the extent to which cooperation for innovation is associated with firm-level product and process 'innovativeness' and, where collaborative relationships are reported, the factors which influence their spatial distribution. With respect to the former issue, the data suggests considerable variety of association across Pavitt's [Research Policy 13 (1994) 343] sectoral taxonomy and innovation type. However, the data also indicates the need for caution when developing network strategies or policies: the evidence presented here is unequivocal in noting that innovation is neither a necessary nor less a sufficient condition for innovation. Moreover, internal resources often act as complements to, or indeed appears to negate the need for, external resources. With regards to the spatial distribution of firm linkages, it appears that increasing firms size and export propensity are positively associated with external linkages at a higher spatial level. Moreover, the spatial reach of innovation-related linkages is also likely to be greater for firms reporting the introduction of relatively novel innovations (i.e. products or processes which are new to the industry). In contrast, smaller firms and firms engaged in incremental product innovations appear more likely to be locally embedded.

AB - Drawing upon a sample of 597 small and medium-sized manufacturing firms, this article investigates the extent to which cooperation for innovation is associated with firm-level product and process 'innovativeness' and, where collaborative relationships are reported, the factors which influence their spatial distribution. With respect to the former issue, the data suggests considerable variety of association across Pavitt's [Research Policy 13 (1994) 343] sectoral taxonomy and innovation type. However, the data also indicates the need for caution when developing network strategies or policies: the evidence presented here is unequivocal in noting that innovation is neither a necessary nor less a sufficient condition for innovation. Moreover, internal resources often act as complements to, or indeed appears to negate the need for, external resources. With regards to the spatial distribution of firm linkages, it appears that increasing firms size and export propensity are positively associated with external linkages at a higher spatial level. Moreover, the spatial reach of innovation-related linkages is also likely to be greater for firms reporting the introduction of relatively novel innovations (i.e. products or processes which are new to the industry). In contrast, smaller firms and firms engaged in incremental product innovations appear more likely to be locally embedded.

KW - innovation

KW - small firms

KW - external linkages

KW - embeddedness

KW - entrepreneurship

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00084-7

U2 - 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00084-7

DO - 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00084-7

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 751

EP - 770

JO - Research Policy

T2 - Research Policy

JF - Research Policy

SN - 0048-7333

IS - 5

ER -