Searching for change: Scottish stop and search powers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In numerous countries stop and search powers are an open sore upon police-community relations, one which is increasingly being challenged through the courts. In the USA the discriminatory practices associated with stop and search powers led to the coining of terms such as “driving while black” (more recently joined by “flying while brown”). In 2013, the District Court for the Southern District of New York held, inter alia, that the City of New York was liable for their indifference towards the New York City Police Department’s widespread practice of stop and frisk which violated the fourth and fourteen amendments of the Constitution. In England stop and search practices were a commonly cited factors in the Tottenham riots and a stop, search and arrest power was the catalyst for the Brixton riots. Since 2010, stop and search has come before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in two cases, one from the Netherlands, the other concerning the UK. Other examples can be found across the globe.
LanguageEnglish
JournalEdinburgh Law Review
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2016

Fingerprint

police
district court
amendment
constitution
human rights
Netherlands
district
community

Keywords

  • police
  • stop and search
  • human rights

Cite this

@article{07dffbbda7974b8a9c2f5d40a9b47e15,
title = "Searching for change: Scottish stop and search powers",
abstract = "In numerous countries stop and search powers are an open sore upon police-community relations, one which is increasingly being challenged through the courts. In the USA the discriminatory practices associated with stop and search powers led to the coining of terms such as “driving while black” (more recently joined by “flying while brown”). In 2013, the District Court for the Southern District of New York held, inter alia, that the City of New York was liable for their indifference towards the New York City Police Department’s widespread practice of stop and frisk which violated the fourth and fourteen amendments of the Constitution. In England stop and search practices were a commonly cited factors in the Tottenham riots and a stop, search and arrest power was the catalyst for the Brixton riots. Since 2010, stop and search has come before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in two cases, one from the Netherlands, the other concerning the UK. Other examples can be found across the globe.",
keywords = "police, stop and search, human rights",
author = "Genevieve Lennon",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3366/elr.2016.0341",
language = "English",
journal = "Edinburgh Law Review",
issn = "1364-9809",
publisher = "Edinburgh University Press",

}

Searching for change : Scottish stop and search powers. / Lennon, Genevieve.

In: Edinburgh Law Review, 01.05.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Searching for change

T2 - Edinburgh Law Review

AU - Lennon, Genevieve

PY - 2016/5/1

Y1 - 2016/5/1

N2 - In numerous countries stop and search powers are an open sore upon police-community relations, one which is increasingly being challenged through the courts. In the USA the discriminatory practices associated with stop and search powers led to the coining of terms such as “driving while black” (more recently joined by “flying while brown”). In 2013, the District Court for the Southern District of New York held, inter alia, that the City of New York was liable for their indifference towards the New York City Police Department’s widespread practice of stop and frisk which violated the fourth and fourteen amendments of the Constitution. In England stop and search practices were a commonly cited factors in the Tottenham riots and a stop, search and arrest power was the catalyst for the Brixton riots. Since 2010, stop and search has come before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in two cases, one from the Netherlands, the other concerning the UK. Other examples can be found across the globe.

AB - In numerous countries stop and search powers are an open sore upon police-community relations, one which is increasingly being challenged through the courts. In the USA the discriminatory practices associated with stop and search powers led to the coining of terms such as “driving while black” (more recently joined by “flying while brown”). In 2013, the District Court for the Southern District of New York held, inter alia, that the City of New York was liable for their indifference towards the New York City Police Department’s widespread practice of stop and frisk which violated the fourth and fourteen amendments of the Constitution. In England stop and search practices were a commonly cited factors in the Tottenham riots and a stop, search and arrest power was the catalyst for the Brixton riots. Since 2010, stop and search has come before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in two cases, one from the Netherlands, the other concerning the UK. Other examples can be found across the globe.

KW - police

KW - stop and search

KW - human rights

UR - http://www.euppublishing.com/loi/elr

U2 - 10.3366/elr.2016.0341

DO - 10.3366/elr.2016.0341

M3 - Article

JO - Edinburgh Law Review

JF - Edinburgh Law Review

SN - 1364-9809

ER -