SEA procedures and methods: the importance of baseline, political and pragmatic contexts

Elsa João, David Annandale

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

1 Citation (Scopus)
48 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This Chapter critically examines procedures and methods that are applied in SEA, identifying strengths and weaknesses of analytical tools, what is missing and what we need to do better or differently. SEA has been increasingly understood by SEA academics and practitioners as a process rather than solely a technique (Bina, 2007). As such, it involves stakeholders with interests and power. Therefore, after an initial section on the background and state of the art of methods and procedures in SEA, the Chapter focuses on three main themes: baseline, political and pragmatic contexts. Through these themes the Chapter discusses how adaptive and robust SEA is in analyzing the impacts and issues that matter.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEuropean and International Experiences of Strategic Environmental Assessment
Subtitle of host publicationRecent Progress and Future Prospects
EditorsBarry Sadler, Jiří Dusík
Place of PublicationMilton Park, Abingdon, Oxon
Pages225-243
Number of pages18
Publication statusPublished - 24 Mar 2016

Keywords

  • SEA
  • strategic environmental assessment
  • environmental impact analysis
  • strategic planning

Cite this

João, E., & Annandale, D. (2016). SEA procedures and methods: the importance of baseline, political and pragmatic contexts. In B. Sadler, & J. Dusík (Eds.), European and International Experiences of Strategic Environmental Assessment: Recent Progress and Future Prospects (pp. 225-243).