Screening, sensitivity, and uncertainty for the CREAM method of human reliability analysis

Tim Bedford, Clare Bayley, Matthew Revie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper reports a sensitivity analysis of the Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method for Human Reliability Analysis. We consider three different aspects: the difference between the outputs of the Basic and Extended methods, on the same HRA scenario; the variability in outputs through the choices made for common performance conditions (CPCs); the variability in outputs through the assignment of choices for cognitive function failures (CFFs). We discuss the problem of interpreting categories when applying the method, compare its quantitative structure to that of first generation methods and discuss also how dependence is modelled with the approach. We show that the control mode intervals used in the Basic method are too narrow to be consistent with the Extended method. This motivates a new screening method that gives improved accuracy with respect to the Basic method, in the sense that (on average) halves the uncertainty associated with the Basic method. We make some observations on the design of a screening method that are generally applicable in Risk Analysis. Finally we propose a new method of combining CPC weights with nominal probabilities so that the calculated probabilities are always in range (ie between 0 and 1), while satisfying sensible properties that are consistent with the overall CREAM method.
LanguageEnglish
Pages100-110
Number of pages11
JournalReliability Engineering and System Safety
Volume115
Early online date7 Mar 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2013

Fingerprint

Reliability Analysis
Reliability analysis
Screening
Uncertainty
Risk analysis
Error analysis
Sensitivity analysis
Human
Output
Risk Analysis
Error Analysis
Categorical or nominal
Sensitivity Analysis
Assignment

Keywords

  • human reliability analysis
  • error analysis
  • risk analysis

Cite this

@article{14bd87a0a8ac4875a29e86790be9fb31,
title = "Screening, sensitivity, and uncertainty for the CREAM method of human reliability analysis",
abstract = "This paper reports a sensitivity analysis of the Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method for Human Reliability Analysis. We consider three different aspects: the difference between the outputs of the Basic and Extended methods, on the same HRA scenario; the variability in outputs through the choices made for common performance conditions (CPCs); the variability in outputs through the assignment of choices for cognitive function failures (CFFs). We discuss the problem of interpreting categories when applying the method, compare its quantitative structure to that of first generation methods and discuss also how dependence is modelled with the approach. We show that the control mode intervals used in the Basic method are too narrow to be consistent with the Extended method. This motivates a new screening method that gives improved accuracy with respect to the Basic method, in the sense that (on average) halves the uncertainty associated with the Basic method. We make some observations on the design of a screening method that are generally applicable in Risk Analysis. Finally we propose a new method of combining CPC weights with nominal probabilities so that the calculated probabilities are always in range (ie between 0 and 1), while satisfying sensible properties that are consistent with the overall CREAM method.",
keywords = "human reliability analysis, error analysis, risk analysis",
author = "Tim Bedford and Clare Bayley and Matthew Revie",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.ress.2013.02.011",
language = "English",
volume = "115",
pages = "100--110",
journal = "Reliability Engineering and System Safety",
issn = "0951-8320",

}

Screening, sensitivity, and uncertainty for the CREAM method of human reliability analysis. / Bedford, Tim; Bayley, Clare; Revie, Matthew.

In: Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 115, 07.2013, p. 100-110.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Screening, sensitivity, and uncertainty for the CREAM method of human reliability analysis

AU - Bedford, Tim

AU - Bayley, Clare

AU - Revie, Matthew

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - This paper reports a sensitivity analysis of the Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method for Human Reliability Analysis. We consider three different aspects: the difference between the outputs of the Basic and Extended methods, on the same HRA scenario; the variability in outputs through the choices made for common performance conditions (CPCs); the variability in outputs through the assignment of choices for cognitive function failures (CFFs). We discuss the problem of interpreting categories when applying the method, compare its quantitative structure to that of first generation methods and discuss also how dependence is modelled with the approach. We show that the control mode intervals used in the Basic method are too narrow to be consistent with the Extended method. This motivates a new screening method that gives improved accuracy with respect to the Basic method, in the sense that (on average) halves the uncertainty associated with the Basic method. We make some observations on the design of a screening method that are generally applicable in Risk Analysis. Finally we propose a new method of combining CPC weights with nominal probabilities so that the calculated probabilities are always in range (ie between 0 and 1), while satisfying sensible properties that are consistent with the overall CREAM method.

AB - This paper reports a sensitivity analysis of the Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method for Human Reliability Analysis. We consider three different aspects: the difference between the outputs of the Basic and Extended methods, on the same HRA scenario; the variability in outputs through the choices made for common performance conditions (CPCs); the variability in outputs through the assignment of choices for cognitive function failures (CFFs). We discuss the problem of interpreting categories when applying the method, compare its quantitative structure to that of first generation methods and discuss also how dependence is modelled with the approach. We show that the control mode intervals used in the Basic method are too narrow to be consistent with the Extended method. This motivates a new screening method that gives improved accuracy with respect to the Basic method, in the sense that (on average) halves the uncertainty associated with the Basic method. We make some observations on the design of a screening method that are generally applicable in Risk Analysis. Finally we propose a new method of combining CPC weights with nominal probabilities so that the calculated probabilities are always in range (ie between 0 and 1), while satisfying sensible properties that are consistent with the overall CREAM method.

KW - human reliability analysis

KW - error analysis

KW - risk analysis

UR - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09518320

U2 - 10.1016/j.ress.2013.02.011

DO - 10.1016/j.ress.2013.02.011

M3 - Article

VL - 115

SP - 100

EP - 110

JO - Reliability Engineering and System Safety

T2 - Reliability Engineering and System Safety

JF - Reliability Engineering and System Safety

SN - 0951-8320

ER -