Screening and brief intervention delivery in the workplace to reduce alcohol-related harm: a pilot randomized controlled trial

Hazel Watson, Christine Godfrey, Angus McFadyen, Katherine McArthur, Marisa Stevenson, Aisha Holloway

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: To explore the feasibility and cost effectiveness of screening and delivery of a brief intervention for hazardous drinking employees. Methods: A pilot randomised controlled trial of a brief intervention delivered by an Occupational Health nurse versus no delivery of brief intervention (control group) conducted in a Local Authority Council (LCA) in the United Kingdom. Changes in quality of life and economic indicators were measured by the EQ-5D. Results: 627 employees were screened of whom 163 (26.01%) fulfilled the inclusion criteria with a total of 57 (35%) agreeing to participate. No significant differences were found between the groups for baseline demographics or levels/patterns of alcohol consumption. A statistically significant effect was found in the mean AUDIT scores over time (F = 8.96, p = 0.004) but not for group (F = 0.017, p = 0.896), and no significant interaction was found (F = 0.148, p = 0.702). The cost of each intervention was calculated at £12.48, the difference in service costs was calculated at £344.50 per person; that is there was a net saving of health and other care costs in the intervention group compared to the control group. The QALYs fell in both intervention and control groups, the difference −0.002 − (−0.010) yields a net advantage of the intervention of 0.008 QALYs. Conclusion: The main results from this pilot study suggest that alcohol brief interventions delivered in the workplace may offer the potential to reduce alcohol-related harm and save public sector resources. A fully powered multi-centre trial is warranted to contribute to the current evidence base and explore further the potential of alcohol brief interventions in the workplace. In a full trial the recruitment method may need to be re-considered.
LanguageEnglish
Pages39-48
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Nursing Studies
Volume52
Issue number1
Early online date5 Jul 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015

Fingerprint

Workplace
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Randomized Controlled Trials
Alcohols
Control Groups
Costs and Cost Analysis
Public Sector
Occupational Health
Alcohol Drinking
Health Care Costs
Drinking
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Nurses
Economics
Quality of Life
Demography
United Kingdom

Keywords

  • alcohol consumption
  • work place
  • screening
  • brief interventions
  • feasibility
  • pilot study
  • randomised controlled trial

Cite this

Watson, Hazel ; Godfrey, Christine ; McFadyen, Angus ; McArthur, Katherine ; Stevenson, Marisa ; Holloway, Aisha. / Screening and brief intervention delivery in the workplace to reduce alcohol-related harm : a pilot randomized controlled trial. In: International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2015 ; Vol. 52, No. 1. pp. 39-48.
@article{760b2a78b9884608b90ea1c3ebc2c2b4,
title = "Screening and brief intervention delivery in the workplace to reduce alcohol-related harm: a pilot randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "Aim: To explore the feasibility and cost effectiveness of screening and delivery of a brief intervention for hazardous drinking employees. Methods: A pilot randomised controlled trial of a brief intervention delivered by an Occupational Health nurse versus no delivery of brief intervention (control group) conducted in a Local Authority Council (LCA) in the United Kingdom. Changes in quality of life and economic indicators were measured by the EQ-5D. Results: 627 employees were screened of whom 163 (26.01{\%}) fulfilled the inclusion criteria with a total of 57 (35{\%}) agreeing to participate. No significant differences were found between the groups for baseline demographics or levels/patterns of alcohol consumption. A statistically significant effect was found in the mean AUDIT scores over time (F = 8.96, p = 0.004) but not for group (F = 0.017, p = 0.896), and no significant interaction was found (F = 0.148, p = 0.702). The cost of each intervention was calculated at £12.48, the difference in service costs was calculated at £344.50 per person; that is there was a net saving of health and other care costs in the intervention group compared to the control group. The QALYs fell in both intervention and control groups, the difference −0.002 − (−0.010) yields a net advantage of the intervention of 0.008 QALYs. Conclusion: The main results from this pilot study suggest that alcohol brief interventions delivered in the workplace may offer the potential to reduce alcohol-related harm and save public sector resources. A fully powered multi-centre trial is warranted to contribute to the current evidence base and explore further the potential of alcohol brief interventions in the workplace. In a full trial the recruitment method may need to be re-considered.",
keywords = "alcohol consumption, work place, screening, brief interventions, feasibility, pilot study, randomised controlled trial",
author = "Hazel Watson and Christine Godfrey and Angus McFadyen and Katherine McArthur and Marisa Stevenson and Aisha Holloway",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.06.013",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "39--48",
journal = "International Journal of Nursing Studies",
issn = "0020-7489",
number = "1",

}

Screening and brief intervention delivery in the workplace to reduce alcohol-related harm : a pilot randomized controlled trial. / Watson, Hazel; Godfrey, Christine; McFadyen, Angus; McArthur, Katherine; Stevenson, Marisa; Holloway, Aisha.

In: International Journal of Nursing Studies, Vol. 52, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 39-48.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Screening and brief intervention delivery in the workplace to reduce alcohol-related harm

T2 - International Journal of Nursing Studies

AU - Watson, Hazel

AU - Godfrey, Christine

AU - McFadyen, Angus

AU - McArthur, Katherine

AU - Stevenson, Marisa

AU - Holloway, Aisha

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Aim: To explore the feasibility and cost effectiveness of screening and delivery of a brief intervention for hazardous drinking employees. Methods: A pilot randomised controlled trial of a brief intervention delivered by an Occupational Health nurse versus no delivery of brief intervention (control group) conducted in a Local Authority Council (LCA) in the United Kingdom. Changes in quality of life and economic indicators were measured by the EQ-5D. Results: 627 employees were screened of whom 163 (26.01%) fulfilled the inclusion criteria with a total of 57 (35%) agreeing to participate. No significant differences were found between the groups for baseline demographics or levels/patterns of alcohol consumption. A statistically significant effect was found in the mean AUDIT scores over time (F = 8.96, p = 0.004) but not for group (F = 0.017, p = 0.896), and no significant interaction was found (F = 0.148, p = 0.702). The cost of each intervention was calculated at £12.48, the difference in service costs was calculated at £344.50 per person; that is there was a net saving of health and other care costs in the intervention group compared to the control group. The QALYs fell in both intervention and control groups, the difference −0.002 − (−0.010) yields a net advantage of the intervention of 0.008 QALYs. Conclusion: The main results from this pilot study suggest that alcohol brief interventions delivered in the workplace may offer the potential to reduce alcohol-related harm and save public sector resources. A fully powered multi-centre trial is warranted to contribute to the current evidence base and explore further the potential of alcohol brief interventions in the workplace. In a full trial the recruitment method may need to be re-considered.

AB - Aim: To explore the feasibility and cost effectiveness of screening and delivery of a brief intervention for hazardous drinking employees. Methods: A pilot randomised controlled trial of a brief intervention delivered by an Occupational Health nurse versus no delivery of brief intervention (control group) conducted in a Local Authority Council (LCA) in the United Kingdom. Changes in quality of life and economic indicators were measured by the EQ-5D. Results: 627 employees were screened of whom 163 (26.01%) fulfilled the inclusion criteria with a total of 57 (35%) agreeing to participate. No significant differences were found between the groups for baseline demographics or levels/patterns of alcohol consumption. A statistically significant effect was found in the mean AUDIT scores over time (F = 8.96, p = 0.004) but not for group (F = 0.017, p = 0.896), and no significant interaction was found (F = 0.148, p = 0.702). The cost of each intervention was calculated at £12.48, the difference in service costs was calculated at £344.50 per person; that is there was a net saving of health and other care costs in the intervention group compared to the control group. The QALYs fell in both intervention and control groups, the difference −0.002 − (−0.010) yields a net advantage of the intervention of 0.008 QALYs. Conclusion: The main results from this pilot study suggest that alcohol brief interventions delivered in the workplace may offer the potential to reduce alcohol-related harm and save public sector resources. A fully powered multi-centre trial is warranted to contribute to the current evidence base and explore further the potential of alcohol brief interventions in the workplace. In a full trial the recruitment method may need to be re-considered.

KW - alcohol consumption

KW - work place

KW - screening

KW - brief interventions

KW - feasibility

KW - pilot study

KW - randomised controlled trial

UR - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748914001709

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.06.013

DO - 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.06.013

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 39

EP - 48

JO - International Journal of Nursing Studies

JF - International Journal of Nursing Studies

SN - 0020-7489

IS - 1

ER -