Scotland

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

160 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Scotland occupies the unique position of being a separate jurisdiction while not, however, a separate state, and as such has its own regulatory framework for mediation. As in other predominantly common law jurisdictions, much of the regulation of mediation is underdeveloped and can be found in the general law and diverse soft law frameworks, such as codes of conduct. The exception to this is the framework for cross-border mediation, which is contained in formal law implementing the provisions of the EU Directive. This dichotomy is reflected in the regulatory robustness ratings, and must be borne in mind by users of mediation in Scotland.
In contrast to its neighbouring jurisdictions, the Scottish courts have been loath to address or promote mediation, viewing the process as taking place outside the judicial frame and being regulated by agreement between the mediator and the parties. This is reflected in the ratings for the relationship and attitude of the courts to mediation. The State has, however, promoted some regulation of the mediation profession, albeit in soft form, by providing some funding for the Scottish Mediation Register, established and maintained by the Scottish Mediation Network, in order to meet the requirements in the EU Directive to provide for a code of conduct for mediators. This has put some structure on Scottish mediation services and facilitated access to mediators for users, in a more transparent fashion, compared to the approach taken in other jurisdictions of the United Kingdom.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEU Mediation Law Handbook
Subtitle of host publicationRegulatory Robustness Ratings for Mediation Regimes
EditorsNadja Alexander, Sabine Walsh, Martin Svatos
Place of PublicationAlphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands
Pages659-695
Number of pages37
ISBN (Electronic)9789041158673
Publication statusPublished - 23 May 2017

Publication series

NameGlobal Trends in Dispute Resolution
PublisherKluwer Law International
Volume7

Fingerprint

mediation
jurisdiction
framework law
EU
rating
regulation
Law
common law
funding
profession

Keywords

  • EU directive on cross border mediation
  • mediation
  • mediation regulation
  • Scotland
  • European Union
  • jurisdiction

Cite this

Irvine, C. (2017). Scotland. In N. Alexander, S. Walsh, & M. Svatos (Eds.), EU Mediation Law Handbook: Regulatory Robustness Ratings for Mediation Regimes (pp. 659-695). (Global Trends in Dispute Resolution; Vol. 7). Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands.
Irvine, Charles. / Scotland. EU Mediation Law Handbook: Regulatory Robustness Ratings for Mediation Regimes. editor / Nadja Alexander ; Sabine Walsh ; Martin Svatos. Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands, 2017. pp. 659-695 (Global Trends in Dispute Resolution).
@inbook{d6f74d991b784d598346ffec58f63c1c,
title = "Scotland",
abstract = "Scotland occupies the unique position of being a separate jurisdiction while not, however, a separate state, and as such has its own regulatory framework for mediation. As in other predominantly common law jurisdictions, much of the regulation of mediation is underdeveloped and can be found in the general law and diverse soft law frameworks, such as codes of conduct. The exception to this is the framework for cross-border mediation, which is contained in formal law implementing the provisions of the EU Directive. This dichotomy is reflected in the regulatory robustness ratings, and must be borne in mind by users of mediation in Scotland.In contrast to its neighbouring jurisdictions, the Scottish courts have been loath to address or promote mediation, viewing the process as taking place outside the judicial frame and being regulated by agreement between the mediator and the parties. This is reflected in the ratings for the relationship and attitude of the courts to mediation. The State has, however, promoted some regulation of the mediation profession, albeit in soft form, by providing some funding for the Scottish Mediation Register, established and maintained by the Scottish Mediation Network, in order to meet the requirements in the EU Directive to provide for a code of conduct for mediators. This has put some structure on Scottish mediation services and facilitated access to mediators for users, in a more transparent fashion, compared to the approach taken in other jurisdictions of the United Kingdom.",
keywords = "EU directive on cross border mediation, mediation, mediation regulation, Scotland, European Union, jurisdiction",
author = "Charles Irvine",
note = "Reprinted from Global Trends in Dispute Resolution, vol. 7, 23 May 2017 pp. 659-695 with permission of Kluwer Law International.",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "23",
language = "English",
isbn = "9789041158598",
series = "Global Trends in Dispute Resolution",
publisher = "Kluwer Law International",
pages = "659--695",
editor = "Nadja Alexander and Sabine Walsh and Svatos, {Martin }",
booktitle = "EU Mediation Law Handbook",

}

Irvine, C 2017, Scotland. in N Alexander, S Walsh & M Svatos (eds), EU Mediation Law Handbook: Regulatory Robustness Ratings for Mediation Regimes. Global Trends in Dispute Resolution, vol. 7, Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands, pp. 659-695.

Scotland. / Irvine, Charles.

EU Mediation Law Handbook: Regulatory Robustness Ratings for Mediation Regimes. ed. / Nadja Alexander; Sabine Walsh; Martin Svatos. Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands, 2017. p. 659-695 (Global Trends in Dispute Resolution; Vol. 7).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

TY - CHAP

T1 - Scotland

AU - Irvine, Charles

N1 - Reprinted from Global Trends in Dispute Resolution, vol. 7, 23 May 2017 pp. 659-695 with permission of Kluwer Law International.

PY - 2017/5/23

Y1 - 2017/5/23

N2 - Scotland occupies the unique position of being a separate jurisdiction while not, however, a separate state, and as such has its own regulatory framework for mediation. As in other predominantly common law jurisdictions, much of the regulation of mediation is underdeveloped and can be found in the general law and diverse soft law frameworks, such as codes of conduct. The exception to this is the framework for cross-border mediation, which is contained in formal law implementing the provisions of the EU Directive. This dichotomy is reflected in the regulatory robustness ratings, and must be borne in mind by users of mediation in Scotland.In contrast to its neighbouring jurisdictions, the Scottish courts have been loath to address or promote mediation, viewing the process as taking place outside the judicial frame and being regulated by agreement between the mediator and the parties. This is reflected in the ratings for the relationship and attitude of the courts to mediation. The State has, however, promoted some regulation of the mediation profession, albeit in soft form, by providing some funding for the Scottish Mediation Register, established and maintained by the Scottish Mediation Network, in order to meet the requirements in the EU Directive to provide for a code of conduct for mediators. This has put some structure on Scottish mediation services and facilitated access to mediators for users, in a more transparent fashion, compared to the approach taken in other jurisdictions of the United Kingdom.

AB - Scotland occupies the unique position of being a separate jurisdiction while not, however, a separate state, and as such has its own regulatory framework for mediation. As in other predominantly common law jurisdictions, much of the regulation of mediation is underdeveloped and can be found in the general law and diverse soft law frameworks, such as codes of conduct. The exception to this is the framework for cross-border mediation, which is contained in formal law implementing the provisions of the EU Directive. This dichotomy is reflected in the regulatory robustness ratings, and must be borne in mind by users of mediation in Scotland.In contrast to its neighbouring jurisdictions, the Scottish courts have been loath to address or promote mediation, viewing the process as taking place outside the judicial frame and being regulated by agreement between the mediator and the parties. This is reflected in the ratings for the relationship and attitude of the courts to mediation. The State has, however, promoted some regulation of the mediation profession, albeit in soft form, by providing some funding for the Scottish Mediation Register, established and maintained by the Scottish Mediation Network, in order to meet the requirements in the EU Directive to provide for a code of conduct for mediators. This has put some structure on Scottish mediation services and facilitated access to mediators for users, in a more transparent fashion, compared to the approach taken in other jurisdictions of the United Kingdom.

KW - EU directive on cross border mediation

KW - mediation

KW - mediation regulation

KW - Scotland

KW - European Union

KW - jurisdiction

UR - https://lrus.wolterskluwer.com/store/products/eu-mediation-law-handbook-regulatory-robustness-ratings-mediation-regimes-prod-9041158596/hardcover-item-1-9041158596

M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

SN - 9789041158598

T3 - Global Trends in Dispute Resolution

SP - 659

EP - 695

BT - EU Mediation Law Handbook

A2 - Alexander, Nadja

A2 - Walsh, Sabine

A2 - Svatos, Martin

CY - Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands

ER -

Irvine C. Scotland. In Alexander N, Walsh S, Svatos M, editors, EU Mediation Law Handbook: Regulatory Robustness Ratings for Mediation Regimes. Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands. 2017. p. 659-695. (Global Trends in Dispute Resolution).