Scientifically unfounded precaution drives European Commission's recommendations on EDC regulation, while defying common sense, well-established science and risk assessment principles

Daniel R. Dietrich, Sonja von Aulock, Hans Marquardt, Bas Blaauboer, Wolfgang Dekant, James Kehrer, Jan Hengstler, Abby Collier, Gio Batta Gori, Olavi Pelkonen, Florian Lang, Frans P. Nijkamp, Kerstin Stemmer, Albert Li, Kai Savolainen, A. Wallace Hayes, Nigel Gooderham, Alan Harvey

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

Abstract

We, the undersigned editors of prominent journals of pharmacology and toxicology, are drawing your attention to the imminent decisions by the European Commission to enforce a regulatory framework for so-called endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs). The currently drafted framework is based on virtually complete ignorance of all well-established and taught principles of pharmacology and toxicology, of opinions raised by the European Commission’s own competent expert authority,1 and of critical statements made by member countries, while avoiding asking for support from the European Commission’s own scientific expert committees.
LanguageEnglish
Pages297-298
Number of pages2
JournalToxicology Research
Volume2
Issue number5
Early online date18 Jul 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2013

Fingerprint

Endocrine Disruptors
Risk assessment
Toxicology
Pharmacology

Keywords

  • endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs)
  • European Commission framework
  • mode-of-action concept

Cite this

Dietrich, Daniel R. ; von Aulock, Sonja ; Marquardt, Hans ; Blaauboer, Bas ; Dekant, Wolfgang ; Kehrer, James ; Hengstler, Jan ; Collier, Abby ; Gori, Gio Batta ; Pelkonen, Olavi ; Lang, Florian ; Nijkamp, Frans P. ; Stemmer, Kerstin ; Li, Albert ; Savolainen, Kai ; Hayes, A. Wallace ; Gooderham, Nigel ; Harvey, Alan. / Scientifically unfounded precaution drives European Commission's recommendations on EDC regulation, while defying common sense, well-established science and risk assessment principles. In: Toxicology Research. 2013 ; Vol. 2, No. 5. pp. 297-298.
@article{cd91b1d764a24378929101e7e93e9f0c,
title = "Scientifically unfounded precaution drives European Commission's recommendations on EDC regulation, while defying common sense, well-established science and risk assessment principles",
abstract = "We, the undersigned editors of prominent journals of pharmacology and toxicology, are drawing your attention to the imminent decisions by the European Commission to enforce a regulatory framework for so-called endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs). The currently drafted framework is based on virtually complete ignorance of all well-established and taught principles of pharmacology and toxicology, of opinions raised by the European Commission’s own competent expert authority,1 and of critical statements made by member countries, while avoiding asking for support from the European Commission’s own scientific expert committees.",
keywords = "endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs), European Commission framework, mode-of-action concept",
author = "Dietrich, {Daniel R.} and {von Aulock}, Sonja and Hans Marquardt and Bas Blaauboer and Wolfgang Dekant and James Kehrer and Jan Hengstler and Abby Collier and Gori, {Gio Batta} and Olavi Pelkonen and Florian Lang and Nijkamp, {Frans P.} and Kerstin Stemmer and Albert Li and Kai Savolainen and Hayes, {A. Wallace} and Nigel Gooderham and Alan Harvey",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1039/c3tx90013d",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "297--298",
journal = "Toxicology Research",
issn = "2045-4538",
publisher = "Royal Society of Chemistry",
number = "5",

}

Dietrich, DR, von Aulock, S, Marquardt, H, Blaauboer, B, Dekant, W, Kehrer, J, Hengstler, J, Collier, A, Gori, GB, Pelkonen, O, Lang, F, Nijkamp, FP, Stemmer, K, Li, A, Savolainen, K, Hayes, AW, Gooderham, N & Harvey, A 2013, 'Scientifically unfounded precaution drives European Commission's recommendations on EDC regulation, while defying common sense, well-established science and risk assessment principles' Toxicology Research, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 297-298. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3tx90013d

Scientifically unfounded precaution drives European Commission's recommendations on EDC regulation, while defying common sense, well-established science and risk assessment principles. / Dietrich, Daniel R.; von Aulock, Sonja; Marquardt, Hans; Blaauboer, Bas ; Dekant, Wolfgang; Kehrer, James; Hengstler, Jan ; Collier, Abby ; Gori, Gio Batta; Pelkonen, Olavi ; Lang, Florian; Nijkamp, Frans P.; Stemmer, Kerstin; Li, Albert; Savolainen, Kai; Hayes, A. Wallace; Gooderham, Nigel; Harvey, Alan.

In: Toxicology Research, Vol. 2, No. 5, 01.09.2013, p. 297-298.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scientifically unfounded precaution drives European Commission's recommendations on EDC regulation, while defying common sense, well-established science and risk assessment principles

AU - Dietrich, Daniel R.

AU - von Aulock, Sonja

AU - Marquardt, Hans

AU - Blaauboer, Bas

AU - Dekant, Wolfgang

AU - Kehrer, James

AU - Hengstler, Jan

AU - Collier, Abby

AU - Gori, Gio Batta

AU - Pelkonen, Olavi

AU - Lang, Florian

AU - Nijkamp, Frans P.

AU - Stemmer, Kerstin

AU - Li, Albert

AU - Savolainen, Kai

AU - Hayes, A. Wallace

AU - Gooderham, Nigel

AU - Harvey, Alan

PY - 2013/9/1

Y1 - 2013/9/1

N2 - We, the undersigned editors of prominent journals of pharmacology and toxicology, are drawing your attention to the imminent decisions by the European Commission to enforce a regulatory framework for so-called endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs). The currently drafted framework is based on virtually complete ignorance of all well-established and taught principles of pharmacology and toxicology, of opinions raised by the European Commission’s own competent expert authority,1 and of critical statements made by member countries, while avoiding asking for support from the European Commission’s own scientific expert committees.

AB - We, the undersigned editors of prominent journals of pharmacology and toxicology, are drawing your attention to the imminent decisions by the European Commission to enforce a regulatory framework for so-called endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs). The currently drafted framework is based on virtually complete ignorance of all well-established and taught principles of pharmacology and toxicology, of opinions raised by the European Commission’s own competent expert authority,1 and of critical statements made by member countries, while avoiding asking for support from the European Commission’s own scientific expert committees.

KW - endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs)

KW - European Commission framework

KW - mode-of-action concept

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881495018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://pubs.rsc.org/en/journals/journalissues/tx#!recentarticles&adv

U2 - 10.1039/c3tx90013d

DO - 10.1039/c3tx90013d

M3 - Editorial

VL - 2

SP - 297

EP - 298

JO - Toxicology Research

T2 - Toxicology Research

JF - Toxicology Research

SN - 2045-4538

IS - 5

ER -