Scepticism and the science of global warming: a rejoinder

Thomas Bryce, Stephen P. Day

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

An adequate epistemology of science will not, as some Old Deferentialists expected [pre-Kuhnian thinkers who held that science progresses by the accumulation of well-confirmed truths], be exclusively logical, but will have a social dimension. Unlike the New Cynicism [of post-Kuhnian critics who write about science with factitious despair], however, it will not see the fact that science is a social enterprise as illegitimating its epistemic pretensions, but as an important factor contributing to its epistemic distinction; not as a reason for favoring the notion of acceptance and neglecting warrant, but as an important factor helping to keep warrant and acceptance appropriately correlated. Puzzling out science, Susan Haack (1995, p. 27). This paper is a rejoinder to the three forum pieces stimulated by our original article in this journal: ‘Scepticism and doubt in science and science education: the complexity of global warming as a socio-scientific issue’ (Bryce and Day 2014).
LanguageEnglish
Pages1025-1037
Number of pages12
JournalCultural Studies of Science Education
Volume9
Issue number4
Early online date21 Nov 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2014

Fingerprint

science
acceptance
epistemology
critic
education

Keywords

  • scepticism
  • global warming
  • science education

Cite this

@article{4df6a220a4494a8da9a26d1e960162cc,
title = "Scepticism and the science of global warming: a rejoinder",
abstract = "An adequate epistemology of science will not, as some Old Deferentialists expected [pre-Kuhnian thinkers who held that science progresses by the accumulation of well-confirmed truths], be exclusively logical, but will have a social dimension. Unlike the New Cynicism [of post-Kuhnian critics who write about science with factitious despair], however, it will not see the fact that science is a social enterprise as illegitimating its epistemic pretensions, but as an important factor contributing to its epistemic distinction; not as a reason for favoring the notion of acceptance and neglecting warrant, but as an important factor helping to keep warrant and acceptance appropriately correlated. Puzzling out science, Susan Haack (1995, p. 27). This paper is a rejoinder to the three forum pieces stimulated by our original article in this journal: ‘Scepticism and doubt in science and science education: the complexity of global warming as a socio-scientific issue’ (Bryce and Day 2014).",
keywords = "scepticism, global warming, science education",
author = "Thomas Bryce and Day, {Stephen P.}",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11422-014-9651-7",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "1025--1037",
journal = "Cultural Studies of Science Education",
issn = "1871-1502",
number = "4",

}

Scepticism and the science of global warming : a rejoinder. / Bryce, Thomas; Day, Stephen P.

In: Cultural Studies of Science Education, Vol. 9, No. 4, 01.12.2014, p. 1025-1037.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scepticism and the science of global warming

T2 - Cultural Studies of Science Education

AU - Bryce, Thomas

AU - Day, Stephen P.

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - An adequate epistemology of science will not, as some Old Deferentialists expected [pre-Kuhnian thinkers who held that science progresses by the accumulation of well-confirmed truths], be exclusively logical, but will have a social dimension. Unlike the New Cynicism [of post-Kuhnian critics who write about science with factitious despair], however, it will not see the fact that science is a social enterprise as illegitimating its epistemic pretensions, but as an important factor contributing to its epistemic distinction; not as a reason for favoring the notion of acceptance and neglecting warrant, but as an important factor helping to keep warrant and acceptance appropriately correlated. Puzzling out science, Susan Haack (1995, p. 27). This paper is a rejoinder to the three forum pieces stimulated by our original article in this journal: ‘Scepticism and doubt in science and science education: the complexity of global warming as a socio-scientific issue’ (Bryce and Day 2014).

AB - An adequate epistemology of science will not, as some Old Deferentialists expected [pre-Kuhnian thinkers who held that science progresses by the accumulation of well-confirmed truths], be exclusively logical, but will have a social dimension. Unlike the New Cynicism [of post-Kuhnian critics who write about science with factitious despair], however, it will not see the fact that science is a social enterprise as illegitimating its epistemic pretensions, but as an important factor contributing to its epistemic distinction; not as a reason for favoring the notion of acceptance and neglecting warrant, but as an important factor helping to keep warrant and acceptance appropriately correlated. Puzzling out science, Susan Haack (1995, p. 27). This paper is a rejoinder to the three forum pieces stimulated by our original article in this journal: ‘Scepticism and doubt in science and science education: the complexity of global warming as a socio-scientific issue’ (Bryce and Day 2014).

KW - scepticism

KW - global warming

KW - science education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84911405791&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11422-014-9651-7

DO - 10.1007/s11422-014-9651-7

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 1025

EP - 1037

JO - Cultural Studies of Science Education

JF - Cultural Studies of Science Education

SN - 1871-1502

IS - 4

ER -