Scenario analysis to support decision making in addressing wicked problems: pitfalls and potential

George Wright, George Cairns, Frances O'Brien, Paul Goodwin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper provides a review and evaluation of the use of scenario methods from the Intuitive Logics (IL) school to address so-called ‘wicked problems’. Scenario planning has been widely advocated by its practitioners and its popularity has increased in the practice arena since the Millennium. However, some academics have described the technique as an ‘art’ that lacks theoretical and methodological rigour. Over recent years, academics have responded to this critique, drawing on both empirical and conceptual studies. This has led to a multiplicity of augmented IL scenario methods. Here, we review these developments and compare them to soft OR methods as a means of tackling wicked problems, drawing, in particular, on Churchman’s moral imperative that we must address the whole problem, not merely ‘carve off’ one part. We conclude that IL scenario planning can be a useful tool in the OR practitioner’s tool kit and that it can complement many of the established soft OR methods
LanguageEnglish
Pages3-19
Number of pages17
JournalEuropean Journal of Operational Research
Volume278
Issue number1
Early online date29 Aug 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2019

Fingerprint

Scenario Analysis
Decision making
Decision Making
Planning
Intuitive
Scenarios
Logic
Multiplicity
Complement
Scenario analysis
Wicked problems
Evaluation
Soft OR
Scenario planning
Scenario method
Review
Drawing

Keywords

  • decision making support systems
  • wicked problems
  • soft operational research methods
  • intuitive logics

Cite this

@article{8cbce07547634df99429742f4287eb7e,
title = "Scenario analysis to support decision making in addressing wicked problems: pitfalls and potential",
abstract = "This paper provides a review and evaluation of the use of scenario methods from the Intuitive Logics (IL) school to address so-called ‘wicked problems’. Scenario planning has been widely advocated by its practitioners and its popularity has increased in the practice arena since the Millennium. However, some academics have described the technique as an ‘art’ that lacks theoretical and methodological rigour. Over recent years, academics have responded to this critique, drawing on both empirical and conceptual studies. This has led to a multiplicity of augmented IL scenario methods. Here, we review these developments and compare them to soft OR methods as a means of tackling wicked problems, drawing, in particular, on Churchman’s moral imperative that we must address the whole problem, not merely ‘carve off’ one part. We conclude that IL scenario planning can be a useful tool in the OR practitioner’s tool kit and that it can complement many of the established soft OR methods",
keywords = "decision making support systems, wicked problems, soft operational research methods, intuitive logics",
author = "George Wright and George Cairns and Frances O'Brien and Paul Goodwin",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejor.2018.08.035",
language = "English",
volume = "278",
pages = "3--19",
journal = "European Journal of Operational Research",
issn = "0377-2217",
number = "1",

}

Scenario analysis to support decision making in addressing wicked problems : pitfalls and potential. / Wright, George; Cairns, George; O'Brien, Frances; Goodwin, Paul.

In: European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 278, No. 1, 01.10.2019, p. 3-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scenario analysis to support decision making in addressing wicked problems

T2 - European Journal of Operational Research

AU - Wright, George

AU - Cairns, George

AU - O'Brien, Frances

AU - Goodwin, Paul

PY - 2019/10/1

Y1 - 2019/10/1

N2 - This paper provides a review and evaluation of the use of scenario methods from the Intuitive Logics (IL) school to address so-called ‘wicked problems’. Scenario planning has been widely advocated by its practitioners and its popularity has increased in the practice arena since the Millennium. However, some academics have described the technique as an ‘art’ that lacks theoretical and methodological rigour. Over recent years, academics have responded to this critique, drawing on both empirical and conceptual studies. This has led to a multiplicity of augmented IL scenario methods. Here, we review these developments and compare them to soft OR methods as a means of tackling wicked problems, drawing, in particular, on Churchman’s moral imperative that we must address the whole problem, not merely ‘carve off’ one part. We conclude that IL scenario planning can be a useful tool in the OR practitioner’s tool kit and that it can complement many of the established soft OR methods

AB - This paper provides a review and evaluation of the use of scenario methods from the Intuitive Logics (IL) school to address so-called ‘wicked problems’. Scenario planning has been widely advocated by its practitioners and its popularity has increased in the practice arena since the Millennium. However, some academics have described the technique as an ‘art’ that lacks theoretical and methodological rigour. Over recent years, academics have responded to this critique, drawing on both empirical and conceptual studies. This has led to a multiplicity of augmented IL scenario methods. Here, we review these developments and compare them to soft OR methods as a means of tackling wicked problems, drawing, in particular, on Churchman’s moral imperative that we must address the whole problem, not merely ‘carve off’ one part. We conclude that IL scenario planning can be a useful tool in the OR practitioner’s tool kit and that it can complement many of the established soft OR methods

KW - decision making support systems

KW - wicked problems

KW - soft operational research methods

KW - intuitive logics

UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/european-journal-of-operational-research

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.08.035

DO - 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.08.035

M3 - Article

VL - 278

SP - 3

EP - 19

JO - European Journal of Operational Research

JF - European Journal of Operational Research

SN - 0377-2217

IS - 1

ER -