Sample selection bias in machine learning for healthcare

Vinod Kumar Chauhan, Lei Clifton, Achille Salaün, Huiqi Yvonne Lu, Kim Branson, Patrick Schwab, Gaurav Nigam, David A. Clifton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

While machine learning algorithms hold promise for personalised medicine, their clinical adoption remains limited, partly due to biases that can compromise the reliability of predictions. In this article, we focus on sample selection bias (SSB), a specific type of bias where the study population is less representative of the target population, leading to biased and potentially harmful decisions. Despite being well-known in the literature, SSB remains scarcely studied in machine learning for healthcare. Moreover, the existing machine learning techniques try to correct the bias mostly by balancing distributions between the study and the target populations, which may result in a loss of predictive performance. To address these problems, our study illustrates the potential risks associated with SSB by examining SSB’s impact on the performance of machine learning algorithms. Most importantly, we propose a new research direction for addressing SSB, based on the target population identification rather than the bias correction. Specifically, we propose two independent networks (T-Net) and a multitasking network (MT-Net) for addressing SSB, where one network/task identifies the target subpopulation which is representative of the study population and the second makes predictions for the identified subpopulation. Our empirical results with synthetic and semi-synthetic datasets highlight that SSB can lead to a large drop in the performance of an algorithm for the target population as compared with the study population, as well as a substantial difference in the performance for the target subpopulations that are representative of the selected and the non-selected patients from the study population. Furthermore, our proposed techniques demonstrate robustness across various settings, including different dataset sizes, event rates and selection rates, outperforming the existing bias correction techniques.
Original languageEnglish
Article number52
Pages (from-to)1-24
Number of pages24
JournalACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare
Volume6
Issue number4
Early online date18 Aug 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Oct 2025

Funding

This work was supported in part by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) and in part by the ITC InnoHK “Oxford-CityU Hong Kong Centre for Cerebrocardiovascular Health Engineering” (COCHE). DAC was supported by an NIHR Research Professorship, an RAEng Research Chair, and the Pandemic Sciences Institute at the University of Oxford. GN is funded by the NIHR (Grant number 302607) for a doctoral research fellowship. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, the Department of Health, the InnoHK—ITC, or the University of Oxford. This work was supported in part by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) and in part by the ITC InnoHK “Oxford-CityU Hong Kong Centre for Cerebrocardiovascular Health Engineering” (COCHE). DAC was supported by an NIHR Research Professorship, an RAEng Research Chair, and the Pandemic Sciences Institute at the University of Oxford. GN is funded by the NIHR (Grant number 302607) for a doctoral research fellowship. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, the Department of Health, the InnoHK—ITC, or the University of Oxford. We thank the reviewers for their insightful feedback, which has greatly improved the quality of this work.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • sample selection bias
  • target population
  • machine learning
  • healthcare
  • risk prediction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sample selection bias in machine learning for healthcare'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this