Robotic-arm assisted versus conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: exploratory secondary analysis of a Randomised Controlled Trial

M. J. G. Blyth, I. Anthony, P. Rowe, M. S. Banger, A. McLean, B. Jones

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: This study reports on a secondary exploratory analysis of the early clinical outcomes of an randomised clinical trial comparing Robotic-arm Assisted Uni-compartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee compared to Manual UKA performed using traditional surgical jigs. This follows reporting of primary outcomes of implant accuracy and gait analysis that showed significant advantages in the Robotic-arm assisted group.Methods139 patients were recruited from a single centre. Patients were randomised to receive either a manual UKA implanted with the aid of traditional surgical jigs, or a UKA implanted with the aid of a tactile guided Robotic-arm Assisted system. Outcome measures included: American Knee Society Score (AKSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Hospital Anxiety Depression (HAD) Scale, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Scale, SF-12, Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS), Somatic Disease (Primary care evaluation of mental disorders [PRIME-MD] score), Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Analgesic use, Patient Satisfaction, complications relating to surgery, 90 day Pain diaries and the requirement for revision surgery.ResultsFrom day 1 post-operation through to week 8 post-operation the median pain scores for Robotic-arm Assisted group were 55.4% lower than those observed in the Manual surgery group (p = 0.040). A greater proportion of patients receiving Robotic-arm Assisted surgery improved their UCLA activity score.At 3 months post-operation, the Robotic-arm Assisted group had better AKSS scores (Robotic median 164 (Quarter 1 131, Quarter 3 178), Manual 143 (Quarter 1 132, Quarter 3 166)), although no difference was noted with the OKS.At 1 year post-operation, the observed differences with the AKSS had narrowed from 21 points to 7 points (p = 0.106) (Robotic median=171 (Quarter 1 153, Quarter 3 179), Manual median=164 (Quarter 1 144, Quarter 3 182 No difference was observed with the OKS, and almost half of each group reached the ceiling limit of the score (OKS > 43).The key factors associated with achieving excellent outcome on the AKSS were a pre-operative activity level > 5 on the UCLA activity score and use of Robotic-arm surgery. Factors associated with a poor outcome were manual surgery and pre-operative depression.Conclusions: Robotic-arm assisted surgery results in improved early pain scores and early function scores in some patient reported outcomes measures, but no difference was observed, at 1 year post operatively. Although improved results favoured the Robotic arm assisted group in active patients (i.e. UCLA > = 5), these do not withstand more stringent multiplicity adjustments.
LanguageEnglish
Pages631-639
Number of pages9
JournalBone and Joint Research
Volume6
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Nov 2017

Fingerprint

Arthroplasty
Robotic arms
Knee Replacement Arthroplasties
Robotics
Arm
Randomized Controlled Trials
Surgery
Knee
Los Angeles
Jigs
Pain
Gait analysis
Depression
Ceilings
Social Adjustment
Knee Osteoarthritis
Touch
Analgesics
Pain Measurement
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures

Keywords

  • UKA
  • robotic
  • RCT
  • unicompartmental knee anthroplasty
  • medial compartment osteoarthritis
  • robotic-arm assisted systems
  • surgery
  • early pain scores
  • early function scores

Cite this

@article{5089a22dcf014a189b92a17ace6951b2,
title = "Robotic-arm assisted versus conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: exploratory secondary analysis of a Randomised Controlled Trial",
abstract = "Objectives: This study reports on a secondary exploratory analysis of the early clinical outcomes of an randomised clinical trial comparing Robotic-arm Assisted Uni-compartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee compared to Manual UKA performed using traditional surgical jigs. This follows reporting of primary outcomes of implant accuracy and gait analysis that showed significant advantages in the Robotic-arm assisted group.Methods139 patients were recruited from a single centre. Patients were randomised to receive either a manual UKA implanted with the aid of traditional surgical jigs, or a UKA implanted with the aid of a tactile guided Robotic-arm Assisted system. Outcome measures included: American Knee Society Score (AKSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Hospital Anxiety Depression (HAD) Scale, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Scale, SF-12, Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS), Somatic Disease (Primary care evaluation of mental disorders [PRIME-MD] score), Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Analgesic use, Patient Satisfaction, complications relating to surgery, 90 day Pain diaries and the requirement for revision surgery.ResultsFrom day 1 post-operation through to week 8 post-operation the median pain scores for Robotic-arm Assisted group were 55.4{\%} lower than those observed in the Manual surgery group (p = 0.040). A greater proportion of patients receiving Robotic-arm Assisted surgery improved their UCLA activity score.At 3 months post-operation, the Robotic-arm Assisted group had better AKSS scores (Robotic median 164 (Quarter 1 131, Quarter 3 178), Manual 143 (Quarter 1 132, Quarter 3 166)), although no difference was noted with the OKS.At 1 year post-operation, the observed differences with the AKSS had narrowed from 21 points to 7 points (p = 0.106) (Robotic median=171 (Quarter 1 153, Quarter 3 179), Manual median=164 (Quarter 1 144, Quarter 3 182 No difference was observed with the OKS, and almost half of each group reached the ceiling limit of the score (OKS > 43).The key factors associated with achieving excellent outcome on the AKSS were a pre-operative activity level > 5 on the UCLA activity score and use of Robotic-arm surgery. Factors associated with a poor outcome were manual surgery and pre-operative depression.Conclusions: Robotic-arm assisted surgery results in improved early pain scores and early function scores in some patient reported outcomes measures, but no difference was observed, at 1 year post operatively. Although improved results favoured the Robotic arm assisted group in active patients (i.e. UCLA > = 5), these do not withstand more stringent multiplicity adjustments.",
keywords = "UKA, robotic, RCT, unicompartmental knee anthroplasty, medial compartment osteoarthritis, robotic-arm assisted systems, surgery, early pain scores, early function scores",
author = "Blyth, {M. J. G.} and I. Anthony and P. Rowe and Banger, {M. S.} and A. McLean and B. Jones",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1302/2046-3758.611.BJR-2017-0060.R1",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "631--639",
journal = "Bone and Joint Research",
issn = "2046-3758",
number = "11",

}

Robotic-arm assisted versus conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty : exploratory secondary analysis of a Randomised Controlled Trial. / Blyth, M. J. G.; Anthony, I.; Rowe, P.; Banger, M. S.; McLean, A.; Jones, B.

In: Bone and Joint Research, Vol. 6, No. 11, 21.11.2017, p. 631-639.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Robotic-arm assisted versus conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

T2 - Bone and Joint Research

AU - Blyth, M. J. G.

AU - Anthony, I.

AU - Rowe, P.

AU - Banger, M. S.

AU - McLean, A.

AU - Jones, B.

PY - 2017/11/21

Y1 - 2017/11/21

N2 - Objectives: This study reports on a secondary exploratory analysis of the early clinical outcomes of an randomised clinical trial comparing Robotic-arm Assisted Uni-compartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee compared to Manual UKA performed using traditional surgical jigs. This follows reporting of primary outcomes of implant accuracy and gait analysis that showed significant advantages in the Robotic-arm assisted group.Methods139 patients were recruited from a single centre. Patients were randomised to receive either a manual UKA implanted with the aid of traditional surgical jigs, or a UKA implanted with the aid of a tactile guided Robotic-arm Assisted system. Outcome measures included: American Knee Society Score (AKSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Hospital Anxiety Depression (HAD) Scale, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Scale, SF-12, Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS), Somatic Disease (Primary care evaluation of mental disorders [PRIME-MD] score), Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Analgesic use, Patient Satisfaction, complications relating to surgery, 90 day Pain diaries and the requirement for revision surgery.ResultsFrom day 1 post-operation through to week 8 post-operation the median pain scores for Robotic-arm Assisted group were 55.4% lower than those observed in the Manual surgery group (p = 0.040). A greater proportion of patients receiving Robotic-arm Assisted surgery improved their UCLA activity score.At 3 months post-operation, the Robotic-arm Assisted group had better AKSS scores (Robotic median 164 (Quarter 1 131, Quarter 3 178), Manual 143 (Quarter 1 132, Quarter 3 166)), although no difference was noted with the OKS.At 1 year post-operation, the observed differences with the AKSS had narrowed from 21 points to 7 points (p = 0.106) (Robotic median=171 (Quarter 1 153, Quarter 3 179), Manual median=164 (Quarter 1 144, Quarter 3 182 No difference was observed with the OKS, and almost half of each group reached the ceiling limit of the score (OKS > 43).The key factors associated with achieving excellent outcome on the AKSS were a pre-operative activity level > 5 on the UCLA activity score and use of Robotic-arm surgery. Factors associated with a poor outcome were manual surgery and pre-operative depression.Conclusions: Robotic-arm assisted surgery results in improved early pain scores and early function scores in some patient reported outcomes measures, but no difference was observed, at 1 year post operatively. Although improved results favoured the Robotic arm assisted group in active patients (i.e. UCLA > = 5), these do not withstand more stringent multiplicity adjustments.

AB - Objectives: This study reports on a secondary exploratory analysis of the early clinical outcomes of an randomised clinical trial comparing Robotic-arm Assisted Uni-compartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee compared to Manual UKA performed using traditional surgical jigs. This follows reporting of primary outcomes of implant accuracy and gait analysis that showed significant advantages in the Robotic-arm assisted group.Methods139 patients were recruited from a single centre. Patients were randomised to receive either a manual UKA implanted with the aid of traditional surgical jigs, or a UKA implanted with the aid of a tactile guided Robotic-arm Assisted system. Outcome measures included: American Knee Society Score (AKSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Hospital Anxiety Depression (HAD) Scale, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Scale, SF-12, Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS), Somatic Disease (Primary care evaluation of mental disorders [PRIME-MD] score), Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Analgesic use, Patient Satisfaction, complications relating to surgery, 90 day Pain diaries and the requirement for revision surgery.ResultsFrom day 1 post-operation through to week 8 post-operation the median pain scores for Robotic-arm Assisted group were 55.4% lower than those observed in the Manual surgery group (p = 0.040). A greater proportion of patients receiving Robotic-arm Assisted surgery improved their UCLA activity score.At 3 months post-operation, the Robotic-arm Assisted group had better AKSS scores (Robotic median 164 (Quarter 1 131, Quarter 3 178), Manual 143 (Quarter 1 132, Quarter 3 166)), although no difference was noted with the OKS.At 1 year post-operation, the observed differences with the AKSS had narrowed from 21 points to 7 points (p = 0.106) (Robotic median=171 (Quarter 1 153, Quarter 3 179), Manual median=164 (Quarter 1 144, Quarter 3 182 No difference was observed with the OKS, and almost half of each group reached the ceiling limit of the score (OKS > 43).The key factors associated with achieving excellent outcome on the AKSS were a pre-operative activity level > 5 on the UCLA activity score and use of Robotic-arm surgery. Factors associated with a poor outcome were manual surgery and pre-operative depression.Conclusions: Robotic-arm assisted surgery results in improved early pain scores and early function scores in some patient reported outcomes measures, but no difference was observed, at 1 year post operatively. Although improved results favoured the Robotic arm assisted group in active patients (i.e. UCLA > = 5), these do not withstand more stringent multiplicity adjustments.

KW - UKA

KW - robotic

KW - RCT

KW - unicompartmental knee anthroplasty

KW - medial compartment osteoarthritis

KW - robotic-arm assisted systems

KW - surgery

KW - early pain scores

KW - early function scores

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85036516753&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://bjr.boneandjoint.org.uk/

U2 - 10.1302/2046-3758.611.BJR-2017-0060.R1

DO - 10.1302/2046-3758.611.BJR-2017-0060.R1

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 631

EP - 639

JO - Bone and Joint Research

JF - Bone and Joint Research

SN - 2046-3758

IS - 11

ER -