'Ritual individualisation': creative genius at sentencing, mitigation and conviction

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Judges and lawyers must regard themselves as upholding cherished values, including: the presumption of innocence; free defendant choice and participation; and attention to the unique individual. Yet, everyday criminal work also demands compliance with a system of perfunctory, mass case-disposal. How is this potential contradiction addressed? Conceiving the criminal-penal process as a tripartite rite of passage, the article originates the concept of ‘Ritual Individualisation’ (RI). RI’s creative pre-sentencing case-work accomplishes four key transformations in how the person is re-presented to the court for sentencing. Firstly, the person’s unique voice and personal story is revealed, exhibiting her as a freely participating individual. Secondly in doing so, the pertinence of social disadvantage tends to be minimised. Thirdly, ambiguous admissions of guilt are translated as freely-given, full and sincere confessions. Fourthly, the person is manifested as a culpable offender ready for punishment. The article considers new research agendas opened up by the implications of Ritual Individualisation.
LanguageEnglish
Pages112-140
Number of pages29
JournalJournal of Law and Society
Volume46
Issue number1
Early online date19 Feb 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

individualization
religious behavior
human being
casework
guilt
ritual
lawyer
offender
penalty
participation
Values

Keywords

  • sentencing
  • individualisation
  • mitigation
  • conviction
  • guilty pleas
  • courts
  • criminal process
  • criminal justice
  • efficiency
  • professions
  • court communities
  • ritual
  • pre-sentence investigation
  • pre-sentence reports

Cite this

@article{34fd6224514a48b6971ce6051ad27189,
title = "'Ritual individualisation': creative genius at sentencing, mitigation and conviction",
abstract = "Judges and lawyers must regard themselves as upholding cherished values, including: the presumption of innocence; free defendant choice and participation; and attention to the unique individual. Yet, everyday criminal work also demands compliance with a system of perfunctory, mass case-disposal. How is this potential contradiction addressed? Conceiving the criminal-penal process as a tripartite rite of passage, the article originates the concept of ‘Ritual Individualisation’ (RI). RI’s creative pre-sentencing case-work accomplishes four key transformations in how the person is re-presented to the court for sentencing. Firstly, the person’s unique voice and personal story is revealed, exhibiting her as a freely participating individual. Secondly in doing so, the pertinence of social disadvantage tends to be minimised. Thirdly, ambiguous admissions of guilt are translated as freely-given, full and sincere confessions. Fourthly, the person is manifested as a culpable offender ready for punishment. The article considers new research agendas opened up by the implications of Ritual Individualisation.",
keywords = "sentencing, individualisation, mitigation, conviction, guilty pleas, courts, criminal process, criminal justice, efficiency, professions, court communities, ritual, pre-sentence investigation, pre-sentence reports",
author = "Cyrus Tata",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1111/jols.12144",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "112--140",
journal = "Journal of Law and Society",
issn = "0263-323X",
number = "1",

}

'Ritual individualisation' : creative genius at sentencing, mitigation and conviction. / Tata, Cyrus.

In: Journal of Law and Society, Vol. 46, No. 1, 31.03.2019, p. 112-140.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'Ritual individualisation'

T2 - Journal of Law and Society

AU - Tata, Cyrus

PY - 2019/3/31

Y1 - 2019/3/31

N2 - Judges and lawyers must regard themselves as upholding cherished values, including: the presumption of innocence; free defendant choice and participation; and attention to the unique individual. Yet, everyday criminal work also demands compliance with a system of perfunctory, mass case-disposal. How is this potential contradiction addressed? Conceiving the criminal-penal process as a tripartite rite of passage, the article originates the concept of ‘Ritual Individualisation’ (RI). RI’s creative pre-sentencing case-work accomplishes four key transformations in how the person is re-presented to the court for sentencing. Firstly, the person’s unique voice and personal story is revealed, exhibiting her as a freely participating individual. Secondly in doing so, the pertinence of social disadvantage tends to be minimised. Thirdly, ambiguous admissions of guilt are translated as freely-given, full and sincere confessions. Fourthly, the person is manifested as a culpable offender ready for punishment. The article considers new research agendas opened up by the implications of Ritual Individualisation.

AB - Judges and lawyers must regard themselves as upholding cherished values, including: the presumption of innocence; free defendant choice and participation; and attention to the unique individual. Yet, everyday criminal work also demands compliance with a system of perfunctory, mass case-disposal. How is this potential contradiction addressed? Conceiving the criminal-penal process as a tripartite rite of passage, the article originates the concept of ‘Ritual Individualisation’ (RI). RI’s creative pre-sentencing case-work accomplishes four key transformations in how the person is re-presented to the court for sentencing. Firstly, the person’s unique voice and personal story is revealed, exhibiting her as a freely participating individual. Secondly in doing so, the pertinence of social disadvantage tends to be minimised. Thirdly, ambiguous admissions of guilt are translated as freely-given, full and sincere confessions. Fourthly, the person is manifested as a culpable offender ready for punishment. The article considers new research agendas opened up by the implications of Ritual Individualisation.

KW - sentencing

KW - individualisation

KW - mitigation

KW - conviction

KW - guilty pleas

KW - courts

KW - criminal process

KW - criminal justice

KW - efficiency

KW - professions

KW - court communities

KW - ritual

KW - pre-sentence investigation

KW - pre-sentence reports

U2 - 10.1111/jols.12144

DO - 10.1111/jols.12144

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 112

EP - 140

JO - Journal of Law and Society

JF - Journal of Law and Society

SN - 0263-323X

IS - 1

ER -