Abstract
"Taking back control of fisheries" became one of the totemic issues uniting supporters of the campaign to leave the EU. Having left, the issue is again high on the agenda in the 'future relationship' negotiations. The UK Government has indicated that getting a better deal for UK fishermen is a "red line" in the negotiations. This includes increases in quota for UK vessels, and restrictions on access to UK waters by foreign vessels. However, the EU has linked access to UK waters and maintenance of quotas enshrined in the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) with securing tariff-free trade in fish and other products.
This extended technical report focuses on the North Sea and provides an assessment of the risks to stock and ecosystem conservation associated with the post-Brexit fisheries negotiations. The report first sets out the history behind the allocation of quota shares (Relative Stability) and compares the UK shares with those under proposed alternative rules based on the distribution of fish ("zonal attachment"). Unless a negotiated agreement can be reached to resolve these different views on quota allocation there is a risk that unilateral actions will result in the combined catches by all states exceeding the levels required for long-term maximum sustainable yields. The report sets out a narrative for the impact of such unilateralism on harvesting rates, and then presents results from models which show the risks that these would pose for key fish stocks and wildlife.
This extended technical report focuses on the North Sea and provides an assessment of the risks to stock and ecosystem conservation associated with the post-Brexit fisheries negotiations. The report first sets out the history behind the allocation of quota shares (Relative Stability) and compares the UK shares with those under proposed alternative rules based on the distribution of fish ("zonal attachment"). Unless a negotiated agreement can be reached to resolve these different views on quota allocation there is a risk that unilateral actions will result in the combined catches by all states exceeding the levels required for long-term maximum sustainable yields. The report sets out a narrative for the impact of such unilateralism on harvesting rates, and then presents results from models which show the risks that these would pose for key fish stocks and wildlife.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Place of Publication | Glasgow |
| Commissioning body | Worldwide Fund for Nature Scotland |
| Number of pages | 138 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 18 Mar 2020 |
Keywords
- Brexit
- fisheries
- negotiations
- wildlife
- North Sea
- modelling
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Risks to North Sea Fish Stocks and Wildlife if Post-Brexit Fishery Negotiations Fail to Reach Agreement on Quotas and Access to UK Waters: Extended Technical Report'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Datasets
-
StrathE2E2 - End-to-End Marine Food Web Model
Heath, M. (Creator) & Thurlbeck, I. (Contributor), University of Strathclyde, 13 Jul 2020
https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=StrathE2E2 and one more link, https://marineresourcemodelling.gitlab.io/resources/index.html (show fewer)
Dataset
-
Scottish Parliament Committee on Culture, Tourism, Europe and External Affairs; Inquiry on the Negotiations of the Future Relationship between the European Union and the UK Government: Submission for Professor Michael Heath, Dr Robin Cook and Professor Paul Fernandes
Heath, M., Cook, R. & Fernandes, P. G., 11 Jun 2020, Edinburgh. 5 p.Research output: Book/Report › Other report
Open AccessFile -
Guest blog - Risks to North Sea fish stocks and wildlife if post-Brexit fisheries negotiations go awry
Heath, M. & Cook, R., 21 May 2020, Edinburgh. 1 p.Research output: Book/Report › Other report
Open AccessFile -
Risk to fish stocks posed by Brexit
Ladd-Jones , H., Heath, M. & Porter, M., 17 Apr 2020Research output: Digital or non-textual outputs › Podcast
File
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver