Risk information source preferences in construction workers

Calvin Burns, Stacey Conchie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose - Many researchers have investigated the determinants of workers’ risk-taking / unsafe behaviours as a way to improve safety management and reduce accidents but there has been a general lack of research about workers’ risk information seeking behaviours or their source preferences for risk information. The aim of this study was to investigate whether occupational risk information source preference was risk independent (i.e. whether workers prefer to receive occupational risk information from proximal sources like supervisors and workmates regardless of the nature of the risk or the source’s expertise regarding that risk, or if they discriminated between information sources based on the type of risk being considered).

Design/methodology/approach - Data were collected from 106 frontline construction workers who were recruited from a single building site within the UK with the help of the safety officer on site. The source from which workers preferred to receive information about a range of risks was measured using a ranking exercise. Specifically, workers were asked to rank five occupational sources (HSE, Safety Manager, Project Manager, Supervisor, Workmates) according to how much they preferred each one to deliver information about eight different risks (Asbestos, Back Pain, Site Transport, Heights, Slips / Trips, Housekeeping, and Site-Specific and Job-Specific Risks).

Findings - We found that supervisors and safety managers were the most preferred sources of risk information overall, but a correspondence analysis suggested that workers’ risk information source preference is risk dependent and might be driven by source expertise.

Practical implications - Our findings have important practical implications for the role of safety managers in risk communication and for building trust within high-hazard organisations.

Originality/value - To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate risk information source preferences in an occupational setting.
LanguageEnglish
Pagesn/a
Number of pages25
JournalEmployee Relations
Volume36
Issue number1
Early online date4 Nov 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Workers
Information sources
Safety
Managers
Supervisors
Information risk
Expertise
Information seeking
Hazard
Design methodology
Risk communication
Accidents
Pain
Safety management
Ranking
Dependent risks
Risk-taking behavior
Project manager
Correspondence analysis
Exercise

Keywords

  • risk management
  • construction workers
  • risk information

Cite this

Burns, Calvin ; Conchie, Stacey. / Risk information source preferences in construction workers. In: Employee Relations. 2013 ; Vol. 36, No. 1. pp. n/a.
@article{c9d1c988a34c494ea6142eae718f07c5,
title = "Risk information source preferences in construction workers",
abstract = "Purpose - Many researchers have investigated the determinants of workers’ risk-taking / unsafe behaviours as a way to improve safety management and reduce accidents but there has been a general lack of research about workers’ risk information seeking behaviours or their source preferences for risk information. The aim of this study was to investigate whether occupational risk information source preference was risk independent (i.e. whether workers prefer to receive occupational risk information from proximal sources like supervisors and workmates regardless of the nature of the risk or the source’s expertise regarding that risk, or if they discriminated between information sources based on the type of risk being considered).Design/methodology/approach - Data were collected from 106 frontline construction workers who were recruited from a single building site within the UK with the help of the safety officer on site. The source from which workers preferred to receive information about a range of risks was measured using a ranking exercise. Specifically, workers were asked to rank five occupational sources (HSE, Safety Manager, Project Manager, Supervisor, Workmates) according to how much they preferred each one to deliver information about eight different risks (Asbestos, Back Pain, Site Transport, Heights, Slips / Trips, Housekeeping, and Site-Specific and Job-Specific Risks).Findings - We found that supervisors and safety managers were the most preferred sources of risk information overall, but a correspondence analysis suggested that workers’ risk information source preference is risk dependent and might be driven by source expertise.Practical implications - Our findings have important practical implications for the role of safety managers in risk communication and for building trust within high-hazard organisations.Originality/value - To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate risk information source preferences in an occupational setting.",
keywords = "risk management, construction workers, risk information",
author = "Calvin Burns and Stacey Conchie",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1108/ER-06-2013-0060",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "n/a",
journal = "Employee Relations",
issn = "0142-5455",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
number = "1",

}

Risk information source preferences in construction workers. / Burns, Calvin; Conchie, Stacey.

In: Employee Relations, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2013, p. n/a.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk information source preferences in construction workers

AU - Burns, Calvin

AU - Conchie, Stacey

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Purpose - Many researchers have investigated the determinants of workers’ risk-taking / unsafe behaviours as a way to improve safety management and reduce accidents but there has been a general lack of research about workers’ risk information seeking behaviours or their source preferences for risk information. The aim of this study was to investigate whether occupational risk information source preference was risk independent (i.e. whether workers prefer to receive occupational risk information from proximal sources like supervisors and workmates regardless of the nature of the risk or the source’s expertise regarding that risk, or if they discriminated between information sources based on the type of risk being considered).Design/methodology/approach - Data were collected from 106 frontline construction workers who were recruited from a single building site within the UK with the help of the safety officer on site. The source from which workers preferred to receive information about a range of risks was measured using a ranking exercise. Specifically, workers were asked to rank five occupational sources (HSE, Safety Manager, Project Manager, Supervisor, Workmates) according to how much they preferred each one to deliver information about eight different risks (Asbestos, Back Pain, Site Transport, Heights, Slips / Trips, Housekeeping, and Site-Specific and Job-Specific Risks).Findings - We found that supervisors and safety managers were the most preferred sources of risk information overall, but a correspondence analysis suggested that workers’ risk information source preference is risk dependent and might be driven by source expertise.Practical implications - Our findings have important practical implications for the role of safety managers in risk communication and for building trust within high-hazard organisations.Originality/value - To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate risk information source preferences in an occupational setting.

AB - Purpose - Many researchers have investigated the determinants of workers’ risk-taking / unsafe behaviours as a way to improve safety management and reduce accidents but there has been a general lack of research about workers’ risk information seeking behaviours or their source preferences for risk information. The aim of this study was to investigate whether occupational risk information source preference was risk independent (i.e. whether workers prefer to receive occupational risk information from proximal sources like supervisors and workmates regardless of the nature of the risk or the source’s expertise regarding that risk, or if they discriminated between information sources based on the type of risk being considered).Design/methodology/approach - Data were collected from 106 frontline construction workers who were recruited from a single building site within the UK with the help of the safety officer on site. The source from which workers preferred to receive information about a range of risks was measured using a ranking exercise. Specifically, workers were asked to rank five occupational sources (HSE, Safety Manager, Project Manager, Supervisor, Workmates) according to how much they preferred each one to deliver information about eight different risks (Asbestos, Back Pain, Site Transport, Heights, Slips / Trips, Housekeeping, and Site-Specific and Job-Specific Risks).Findings - We found that supervisors and safety managers were the most preferred sources of risk information overall, but a correspondence analysis suggested that workers’ risk information source preference is risk dependent and might be driven by source expertise.Practical implications - Our findings have important practical implications for the role of safety managers in risk communication and for building trust within high-hazard organisations.Originality/value - To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate risk information source preferences in an occupational setting.

KW - risk management

KW - construction workers

KW - risk information

UR - http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?issn=0142-5455

U2 - 10.1108/ER-06-2013-0060

DO - 10.1108/ER-06-2013-0060

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - n/a

JO - Employee Relations

T2 - Employee Relations

JF - Employee Relations

SN - 0142-5455

IS - 1

ER -