Rights and solidarity during COVID-19

Simon Halliday, Jed Meers, Joe Tomlinson

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

20 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The lockdown imposed by the four governments of the UK in late March 2020 represented an extraordinary, rapid, and radical restriction on normal life for the entire population. What did the UK public think about this unprecedented governmental intervention? Specifically, what was the popular rights consciousness with respect to the lockdown restrictions? The chapter argues that, despite notable and powerful public statements about the extent to which lockdown represented an unacceptable violation of basic rights and liberties, this claim failed to capture the public imagination. Instead, most people either regarded the violation of basic rights as acceptable, given the context of the pandemic, or simply failed to think of the lockdown in terms of basic rights at all. The chapter suggests that such popular rights consciousness has been shaped by the strength of social solidarity during the crisis – what we might describe as a kind of popular 'obligation' consciousness.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPandemic Legalities
Subtitle of host publicationLegal Responses to COVID-19 Justice and Social Responsibility
EditorsDave Cowan, Ann Mumford
Place of PublicationBristol
Chapter6
Pages79-92
Number of pages14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Jul 2021

Keywords

  • rights
  • solidarity
  • Covid-19

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rights and solidarity during COVID-19'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this