Abstract
A national multi-disciplinary audit showed variation in SLT practice on the decision to review pre-school children or place them on waiting lists following initial assessment. Audit evidence suggests some reasons for these differences and contributing factors are illustrated by case history examples. Current health-care policies encourage practitioners to make decision-making transparent to consumers but this process is problematic if there is a lack of evidence to support principled choice. An outline is presented to enable therapists to gather their own evidence for review outcomes in daily practice.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 258-263 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue number | Supplement |
| Publication status | Published - 2001 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- pre-school children
- speech and language therapy
- health policy
- decision-making
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reviewing the review process: examining decision-making in practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver