Rethinking policy 'impact': four models of research policy relations

Christina Boswell, Katherine E. Smith

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    47 Citations (Scopus)
    12 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Political scientists are increasingly exhorted to ensure their research has policy ‘impact’, most notably via Research Excellence Framework (REF) impact case studies, and ‘pathways to impact’ statements in UK Research Council funding applications. Yet the assumptions underpinning these frameworks often fail to reflect available evidence and theories. Notions of ‘impact’, ‘engagement’ and ‘knowledge exchange’ are typically premised on simplistic, linear models of the policy process, according to which policy-makers are keen to ‘utilise’ expertise to produce more ‘effective’ policies. Such accounts overlook the rich body of literature in political science, policy studies, and sociology of knowledge, which offer more complex and nuanced accounts. Drawing on this wider literature, this paper sets out four different approaches to theorising the relationship: (1) knowledge shapes policy; (2) politics shapes knowledge; (3) co-production; and (4) autonomous spheres. We consider what each of these four approaches suggests about approaches to incentivising and measuring research impact.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1-10
    Number of pages10
    JournalPalgrave Communications
    Volume3
    Issue number44
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 12 Dec 2017

    Keywords

    • policy process
    • research policy
    • knowledge exchange

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Rethinking policy 'impact': four models of research policy relations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this