Rethinking law and new governance in the European Union: the case of migration management

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article proposes a way forward in the debate about law and new governance in the contemporary European Union. Migration management is used a prism through which we can see what is happening in a significant area of EU activity and re-evaluate new governance, both in terms of its opportunities, but also crucially, its dangers. A rethink on new governance and its application to external migration implies an alteration of the lenses by which we see migration, by uncoupling new governance from its synergy with ?good? governance and to instead consider that new governance may offer policy-makers opportunities to meet goals beyond legislative processes. The article does not argue that new governance should be used in migration management. Rather, by using governance as an explanatory concept and providing a critique, the contribution of the article is to highlight the potential dangers that new modes of governance may pose to transparency and legitimacy in the contemporary EU, especially if they are used to bypass legislative processes and avoid civic involvement.
LanguageEnglish
Pages362-378
Number of pages17
JournalEuropean Law Review
Volume41
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2016

Fingerprint

migration
governance
Law
management
external migration
EU
synergy
transparency
legitimacy

Keywords

  • EU law
  • jurisprudence
  • migration
  • transparency

Cite this

@article{6585c9feb4fa42e3b08111aa38b30120,
title = "Rethinking law and new governance in the European Union: the case of migration management",
abstract = "This article proposes a way forward in the debate about law and new governance in the contemporary European Union. Migration management is used a prism through which we can see what is happening in a significant area of EU activity and re-evaluate new governance, both in terms of its opportunities, but also crucially, its dangers. A rethink on new governance and its application to external migration implies an alteration of the lenses by which we see migration, by uncoupling new governance from its synergy with ?good? governance and to instead consider that new governance may offer policy-makers opportunities to meet goals beyond legislative processes. The article does not argue that new governance should be used in migration management. Rather, by using governance as an explanatory concept and providing a critique, the contribution of the article is to highlight the potential dangers that new modes of governance may pose to transparency and legitimacy in the contemporary EU, especially if they are used to bypass legislative processes and avoid civic involvement.",
keywords = "EU law, jurisprudence, migration, transparency",
author = "Cardwell, {Paul James}",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "362--378",
journal = "European Law Review",
issn = "0307-5400",
number = "3",

}

Rethinking law and new governance in the European Union : the case of migration management. / Cardwell, Paul James.

In: European Law Review, Vol. 41, No. 3, 01.06.2016, p. 362-378.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rethinking law and new governance in the European Union

T2 - European Law Review

AU - Cardwell, Paul James

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - This article proposes a way forward in the debate about law and new governance in the contemporary European Union. Migration management is used a prism through which we can see what is happening in a significant area of EU activity and re-evaluate new governance, both in terms of its opportunities, but also crucially, its dangers. A rethink on new governance and its application to external migration implies an alteration of the lenses by which we see migration, by uncoupling new governance from its synergy with ?good? governance and to instead consider that new governance may offer policy-makers opportunities to meet goals beyond legislative processes. The article does not argue that new governance should be used in migration management. Rather, by using governance as an explanatory concept and providing a critique, the contribution of the article is to highlight the potential dangers that new modes of governance may pose to transparency and legitimacy in the contemporary EU, especially if they are used to bypass legislative processes and avoid civic involvement.

AB - This article proposes a way forward in the debate about law and new governance in the contemporary European Union. Migration management is used a prism through which we can see what is happening in a significant area of EU activity and re-evaluate new governance, both in terms of its opportunities, but also crucially, its dangers. A rethink on new governance and its application to external migration implies an alteration of the lenses by which we see migration, by uncoupling new governance from its synergy with ?good? governance and to instead consider that new governance may offer policy-makers opportunities to meet goals beyond legislative processes. The article does not argue that new governance should be used in migration management. Rather, by using governance as an explanatory concept and providing a critique, the contribution of the article is to highlight the potential dangers that new modes of governance may pose to transparency and legitimacy in the contemporary EU, especially if they are used to bypass legislative processes and avoid civic involvement.

KW - EU law

KW - jurisprudence

KW - migration

KW - transparency

UR - http://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/catalogue/productdetails.aspx?recordid=427&productid=6968

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 362

EP - 378

JO - European Law Review

JF - European Law Review

SN - 0307-5400

IS - 3

ER -