Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review persepective

David Nicol, Avril Thomson, Caroline Breslin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

187 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Peer review is a reciprocal process whereby students produce feedback reviews on the work of peers and receive feedback reviews from peers on their own work. Prior research has primarily examined the learning benefits that result from the receipt of feedback reviews, with few studies specifically exploring the merits of producing feedback reviews or the learning mechanisms that this activates. Using accounts of their experiences of peer review, this study illuminates students’ perceptions of the different learning benefits resulting from feedback receipt and feedback production, and, importantly, it provides insight into the cognitive processes that are activated when students construct feedback reviews. The findings show that producing feedback reviews engages students in multiple acts of evaluative judgement, both about the work of peers, and, through a reflective process, about their own work; that it involves them in both invoking and applying criteria to explain those judgements; and that it shifts control of feedback processes into students’ hands, a shift that can reduce their need for external feedback. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed. It is argued that the capacity to produce quality feedback is a fundamental graduate skill, and, as such, it should receive much greater attention in higher education curricula.
LanguageEnglish
Pages102-122
Number of pages21
JournalAssessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
Volume39
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2014

Fingerprint

peer review
education
student
learning
education curriculum
graduate

Keywords

  • feedback and assessment
  • peer review
  • higher education
  • evaluation
  • students’ perceptions
  • learning benefits

Cite this

@article{0e4770c67baa406e8ec3503a763129b4,
title = "Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review persepective",
abstract = "Peer review is a reciprocal process whereby students produce feedback reviews on the work of peers and receive feedback reviews from peers on their own work. Prior research has primarily examined the learning benefits that result from the receipt of feedback reviews, with few studies specifically exploring the merits of producing feedback reviews or the learning mechanisms that this activates. Using accounts of their experiences of peer review, this study illuminates students’ perceptions of the different learning benefits resulting from feedback receipt and feedback production, and, importantly, it provides insight into the cognitive processes that are activated when students construct feedback reviews. The findings show that producing feedback reviews engages students in multiple acts of evaluative judgement, both about the work of peers, and, through a reflective process, about their own work; that it involves them in both invoking and applying criteria to explain those judgements; and that it shifts control of feedback processes into students’ hands, a shift that can reduce their need for external feedback. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed. It is argued that the capacity to produce quality feedback is a fundamental graduate skill, and, as such, it should receive much greater attention in higher education curricula.",
keywords = "feedback and assessment, peer review, higher education, evaluation, students’ perceptions, learning benefits",
author = "David Nicol and Avril Thomson and Caroline Breslin",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1080/02602938.2013.795518",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "102--122",
journal = "Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education",
issn = "0260-2938",
number = "1",

}

Rethinking feedback practices in higher education : a peer review persepective. / Nicol, David; Thomson, Avril; Breslin, Caroline.

In: Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 39, No. 1, 01.2014, p. 102-122.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rethinking feedback practices in higher education

T2 - Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

AU - Nicol, David

AU - Thomson, Avril

AU - Breslin, Caroline

PY - 2014/1

Y1 - 2014/1

N2 - Peer review is a reciprocal process whereby students produce feedback reviews on the work of peers and receive feedback reviews from peers on their own work. Prior research has primarily examined the learning benefits that result from the receipt of feedback reviews, with few studies specifically exploring the merits of producing feedback reviews or the learning mechanisms that this activates. Using accounts of their experiences of peer review, this study illuminates students’ perceptions of the different learning benefits resulting from feedback receipt and feedback production, and, importantly, it provides insight into the cognitive processes that are activated when students construct feedback reviews. The findings show that producing feedback reviews engages students in multiple acts of evaluative judgement, both about the work of peers, and, through a reflective process, about their own work; that it involves them in both invoking and applying criteria to explain those judgements; and that it shifts control of feedback processes into students’ hands, a shift that can reduce their need for external feedback. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed. It is argued that the capacity to produce quality feedback is a fundamental graduate skill, and, as such, it should receive much greater attention in higher education curricula.

AB - Peer review is a reciprocal process whereby students produce feedback reviews on the work of peers and receive feedback reviews from peers on their own work. Prior research has primarily examined the learning benefits that result from the receipt of feedback reviews, with few studies specifically exploring the merits of producing feedback reviews or the learning mechanisms that this activates. Using accounts of their experiences of peer review, this study illuminates students’ perceptions of the different learning benefits resulting from feedback receipt and feedback production, and, importantly, it provides insight into the cognitive processes that are activated when students construct feedback reviews. The findings show that producing feedback reviews engages students in multiple acts of evaluative judgement, both about the work of peers, and, through a reflective process, about their own work; that it involves them in both invoking and applying criteria to explain those judgements; and that it shifts control of feedback processes into students’ hands, a shift that can reduce their need for external feedback. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed. It is argued that the capacity to produce quality feedback is a fundamental graduate skill, and, as such, it should receive much greater attention in higher education curricula.

KW - feedback and assessment

KW - peer review

KW - higher education

KW - evaluation

KW - students’ perceptions

KW - learning benefits

U2 - 10.1080/02602938.2013.795518

DO - 10.1080/02602938.2013.795518

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 102

EP - 122

JO - Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

JF - Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

SN - 0260-2938

IS - 1

ER -