Resource rights and the evolution of renewable energy technologies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Modern renewable energy technologies such as wind turbines and photovoltaic cells are developing rapidly, which raises the risk of conflicts over a range of issues, from aesthetic impacts to rights of access. Although these conflicts arise from the deployment of a new technology, in many cases the underlying nature of the conflict is not novel, and historic cases can help to inform the development of a fair and effective management of these conflicts. This paper draws attention to one particular type of conflict; namely the right to gain or protect access to the energy flux. An examination of historic conflicts and judicial arbitration over the rights to extract useful energy by capturing the wind, water or sun, reveals that it is the nature of the energy capturing technology, the end-use of the energy and the local cultural and infrastructural setting which are key to the determination of local property rights over the flow of air, water or sunlight. Historical examples of wind and watermills, and a historic-contemporary comparison of ‘rights to light’, suggest that renewable energy technologies that are susceptible to multiple conflicts, for example due to the scale of the technology or the directionality of the energy flux across individual property boundaries, could be effectively governed in a more collaborative manner, with laws being both technology specific and locally adaptive.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2399-2405
Number of pages7
JournalRenewable Energy
Volume35
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Nov 2010

Fingerprint

Fluxes
Photovoltaic cells
Sun
Wind turbines
Water
Air

Keywords

  • property rights
  • ownership
  • windmills
  • solar

Cite this

@article{e8ecc04d5b134c678276bd1d78fbdcab,
title = "Resource rights and the evolution of renewable energy technologies",
abstract = "Modern renewable energy technologies such as wind turbines and photovoltaic cells are developing rapidly, which raises the risk of conflicts over a range of issues, from aesthetic impacts to rights of access. Although these conflicts arise from the deployment of a new technology, in many cases the underlying nature of the conflict is not novel, and historic cases can help to inform the development of a fair and effective management of these conflicts. This paper draws attention to one particular type of conflict; namely the right to gain or protect access to the energy flux. An examination of historic conflicts and judicial arbitration over the rights to extract useful energy by capturing the wind, water or sun, reveals that it is the nature of the energy capturing technology, the end-use of the energy and the local cultural and infrastructural setting which are key to the determination of local property rights over the flow of air, water or sunlight. Historical examples of wind and watermills, and a historic-contemporary comparison of ‘rights to light’, suggest that renewable energy technologies that are susceptible to multiple conflicts, for example due to the scale of the technology or the directionality of the energy flux across individual property boundaries, could be effectively governed in a more collaborative manner, with laws being both technology specific and locally adaptive.",
keywords = "property rights, ownership, windmills, solar",
author = "Saskia Vermeylen",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1016/j.renene.2010.03.017",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "2399--2405",
journal = "Renewable Energy",
issn = "0960-1481",
number = "11",

}

Resource rights and the evolution of renewable energy technologies. / Vermeylen, Saskia.

In: Renewable Energy, Vol. 35, No. 11, 30.11.2010, p. 2399-2405.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resource rights and the evolution of renewable energy technologies

AU - Vermeylen, Saskia

PY - 2010/11/30

Y1 - 2010/11/30

N2 - Modern renewable energy technologies such as wind turbines and photovoltaic cells are developing rapidly, which raises the risk of conflicts over a range of issues, from aesthetic impacts to rights of access. Although these conflicts arise from the deployment of a new technology, in many cases the underlying nature of the conflict is not novel, and historic cases can help to inform the development of a fair and effective management of these conflicts. This paper draws attention to one particular type of conflict; namely the right to gain or protect access to the energy flux. An examination of historic conflicts and judicial arbitration over the rights to extract useful energy by capturing the wind, water or sun, reveals that it is the nature of the energy capturing technology, the end-use of the energy and the local cultural and infrastructural setting which are key to the determination of local property rights over the flow of air, water or sunlight. Historical examples of wind and watermills, and a historic-contemporary comparison of ‘rights to light’, suggest that renewable energy technologies that are susceptible to multiple conflicts, for example due to the scale of the technology or the directionality of the energy flux across individual property boundaries, could be effectively governed in a more collaborative manner, with laws being both technology specific and locally adaptive.

AB - Modern renewable energy technologies such as wind turbines and photovoltaic cells are developing rapidly, which raises the risk of conflicts over a range of issues, from aesthetic impacts to rights of access. Although these conflicts arise from the deployment of a new technology, in many cases the underlying nature of the conflict is not novel, and historic cases can help to inform the development of a fair and effective management of these conflicts. This paper draws attention to one particular type of conflict; namely the right to gain or protect access to the energy flux. An examination of historic conflicts and judicial arbitration over the rights to extract useful energy by capturing the wind, water or sun, reveals that it is the nature of the energy capturing technology, the end-use of the energy and the local cultural and infrastructural setting which are key to the determination of local property rights over the flow of air, water or sunlight. Historical examples of wind and watermills, and a historic-contemporary comparison of ‘rights to light’, suggest that renewable energy technologies that are susceptible to multiple conflicts, for example due to the scale of the technology or the directionality of the energy flux across individual property boundaries, could be effectively governed in a more collaborative manner, with laws being both technology specific and locally adaptive.

KW - property rights

KW - ownership

KW - windmills

KW - solar

UR - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148110001345

U2 - 10.1016/j.renene.2010.03.017

DO - 10.1016/j.renene.2010.03.017

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 2399

EP - 2405

JO - Renewable Energy

JF - Renewable Energy

SN - 0960-1481

IS - 11

ER -