Resisting change: organizational decoupling through an identity construction perspective

Konstantinos Pitsakis, Marina Biniari, Thijs Kuin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to provide a framework that explains how individual organizational members’ self-construction processes motivate them to support or reject decoupling as a form of resistance to institutionally mandated change.
Most studies have looked at powerful organizational actors and top management teams that decide to decouple. This paper broadens our understanding through a micro-level approach that focuses on the role of individual members within organizational. Specifically, it looks at what happens inside organizations after the decision to decouple has been taken.
This paper identifies three alternative self identity construction pathways that members may choose following the decision of an organization to decouple: a) strong identification with the organization; b) strong identification with the institutional pressure; and c) adoption of both organizational and institutional identities. Our framework specifies how and under which conditions the way individuals identify and manage identity multiplicity impacts organizational resistance to change.
Future research could test the proposed framework particularly through case studies or qualitative designs that look deep into organizational processes and individual attitudes towards decoupling.
Practitioners, particularly top management teams, can adopt a moderating role in influencing the identification process of their employees. They can also communicate better why efficiency is more important than the mandated changes, and why decoupling must be supported to safeguard the organization’s “efficient” identity.
Our paper integrates institutional theory’s macro-perspectives with micro-perspectives of individual members’ identity and self-construction processes within organizations. It contributes to existing institutional accounts of agentic change and resistance to change through a dynamic framework that prescribes individual interests and preferences based on identification processes.

LanguageEnglish
Pages835-852
Number of pages29
JournalJournal of Organizational Change Management
Volume25
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Impact resistance
Macros
Decoupling
Identity construction
Organizational change
Personnel
Resistance to change
Top management teams
Multiplicity
Organizational processes
Pathway
Institutional theory
Safeguards
Employees
Institutional pressures
Self-identity
Organizational impacts

Keywords

  • institutions
  • organizationaldecoupling
  • resisting change
  • construction perspective
  • change management
  • corporate identity

Cite this

Pitsakis, Konstantinos ; Biniari, Marina ; Kuin, Thijs. / Resisting change : organizational decoupling through an identity construction perspective. In: Journal of Organizational Change Management . 2012 ; Vol. 25, No. 6. pp. 835-852.
@article{a63aed3c9985401094fe4bb6217f9793,
title = "Resisting change: organizational decoupling through an identity construction perspective",
abstract = "The purpose of this paper is to provide a framework that explains how individual organizational members’ self-construction processes motivate them to support or reject decoupling as a form of resistance to institutionally mandated change.Most studies have looked at powerful organizational actors and top management teams that decide to decouple. This paper broadens our understanding through a micro-level approach that focuses on the role of individual members within organizational. Specifically, it looks at what happens inside organizations after the decision to decouple has been taken. This paper identifies three alternative self identity construction pathways that members may choose following the decision of an organization to decouple: a) strong identification with the organization; b) strong identification with the institutional pressure; and c) adoption of both organizational and institutional identities. Our framework specifies how and under which conditions the way individuals identify and manage identity multiplicity impacts organizational resistance to change.Future research could test the proposed framework particularly through case studies or qualitative designs that look deep into organizational processes and individual attitudes towards decoupling. Practitioners, particularly top management teams, can adopt a moderating role in influencing the identification process of their employees. They can also communicate better why efficiency is more important than the mandated changes, and why decoupling must be supported to safeguard the organization’s “efficient” identity. Our paper integrates institutional theory’s macro-perspectives with micro-perspectives of individual members’ identity and self-construction processes within organizations. It contributes to existing institutional accounts of agentic change and resistance to change through a dynamic framework that prescribes individual interests and preferences based on identification processes.",
keywords = "institutions, organizationaldecoupling, resisting change, construction perspective, change management, corporate identity",
author = "Konstantinos Pitsakis and Marina Biniari and Thijs Kuin",
note = "Duplicate entry - ID 19543392. Paper based on contribution at the 2011 AOM conference called: 'Mapping Organizational Decoupling Through a Social and Organizational Identity Perspective' http://program.aomonline.org/2011/pdf/AOM_2011_Annual_Meeting_Program.pdf",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1108/09534811211280591",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "835--852",
journal = "Journal of Organizational Change Management",
issn = "0953-4814",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
number = "6",

}

Resisting change : organizational decoupling through an identity construction perspective. / Pitsakis, Konstantinos ; Biniari, Marina; Kuin, Thijs.

In: Journal of Organizational Change Management , Vol. 25, No. 6, 2012, p. 835-852.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resisting change

T2 - Journal of Organizational Change Management

AU - Pitsakis, Konstantinos

AU - Biniari, Marina

AU - Kuin, Thijs

N1 - Duplicate entry - ID 19543392. Paper based on contribution at the 2011 AOM conference called: 'Mapping Organizational Decoupling Through a Social and Organizational Identity Perspective' http://program.aomonline.org/2011/pdf/AOM_2011_Annual_Meeting_Program.pdf

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - The purpose of this paper is to provide a framework that explains how individual organizational members’ self-construction processes motivate them to support or reject decoupling as a form of resistance to institutionally mandated change.Most studies have looked at powerful organizational actors and top management teams that decide to decouple. This paper broadens our understanding through a micro-level approach that focuses on the role of individual members within organizational. Specifically, it looks at what happens inside organizations after the decision to decouple has been taken. This paper identifies three alternative self identity construction pathways that members may choose following the decision of an organization to decouple: a) strong identification with the organization; b) strong identification with the institutional pressure; and c) adoption of both organizational and institutional identities. Our framework specifies how and under which conditions the way individuals identify and manage identity multiplicity impacts organizational resistance to change.Future research could test the proposed framework particularly through case studies or qualitative designs that look deep into organizational processes and individual attitudes towards decoupling. Practitioners, particularly top management teams, can adopt a moderating role in influencing the identification process of their employees. They can also communicate better why efficiency is more important than the mandated changes, and why decoupling must be supported to safeguard the organization’s “efficient” identity. Our paper integrates institutional theory’s macro-perspectives with micro-perspectives of individual members’ identity and self-construction processes within organizations. It contributes to existing institutional accounts of agentic change and resistance to change through a dynamic framework that prescribes individual interests and preferences based on identification processes.

AB - The purpose of this paper is to provide a framework that explains how individual organizational members’ self-construction processes motivate them to support or reject decoupling as a form of resistance to institutionally mandated change.Most studies have looked at powerful organizational actors and top management teams that decide to decouple. This paper broadens our understanding through a micro-level approach that focuses on the role of individual members within organizational. Specifically, it looks at what happens inside organizations after the decision to decouple has been taken. This paper identifies three alternative self identity construction pathways that members may choose following the decision of an organization to decouple: a) strong identification with the organization; b) strong identification with the institutional pressure; and c) adoption of both organizational and institutional identities. Our framework specifies how and under which conditions the way individuals identify and manage identity multiplicity impacts organizational resistance to change.Future research could test the proposed framework particularly through case studies or qualitative designs that look deep into organizational processes and individual attitudes towards decoupling. Practitioners, particularly top management teams, can adopt a moderating role in influencing the identification process of their employees. They can also communicate better why efficiency is more important than the mandated changes, and why decoupling must be supported to safeguard the organization’s “efficient” identity. Our paper integrates institutional theory’s macro-perspectives with micro-perspectives of individual members’ identity and self-construction processes within organizations. It contributes to existing institutional accounts of agentic change and resistance to change through a dynamic framework that prescribes individual interests and preferences based on identification processes.

KW - institutions

KW - organizationaldecoupling

KW - resisting change

KW - construction perspective

KW - change management

KW - corporate identity

UR - http://www.emeraldinsight.com/products/journals/journals.htm?id=jocm

U2 - 10.1108/09534811211280591

DO - 10.1108/09534811211280591

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 835

EP - 852

JO - Journal of Organizational Change Management

JF - Journal of Organizational Change Management

SN - 0953-4814

IS - 6

ER -