Research methods for organizational learning: the transatlantic gap

M. Easterby-Smith, S.X. Li, J. Bartunek

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    12 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Research design has a notable impact on the nature of management and organizational research, and there have been numerous mentions, largely anecdotal, of differences in research design between journals published in the UK and USA. This article describes a systematic study of these supposed differences through content-analysis of 295 articles about organizational learning published in eight leading British- and US-based journals over the past 20 years. The results demonstrate substantial differences in data sources, data collection, and the scale of investigations. We discuss their impact on gaps in the study o f organizational learning and o f fer our own thoughts on possible solutions (as well as challenges) for bridging these gaps.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages439-447
    Number of pages8
    JournalManagement Learning
    Volume40
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sep 2009

    Fingerprint

    Organizational learning
    Research methods
    Research design
    Management research
    Data collection
    Content analysis
    Data sources
    Organizational research

    Keywords

    • organizational learning
    • research methods
    • UK
    • USA

    Cite this

    Easterby-Smith, M. ; Li, S.X. ; Bartunek, J. / Research methods for organizational learning: the transatlantic gap. In: Management Learning. 2009 ; Vol. 40, No. 4. pp. 439-447.
    @article{c958b29606a44f3a89860310f92610d7,
    title = "Research methods for organizational learning: the transatlantic gap",
    abstract = "Research design has a notable impact on the nature of management and organizational research, and there have been numerous mentions, largely anecdotal, of differences in research design between journals published in the UK and USA. This article describes a systematic study of these supposed differences through content-analysis of 295 articles about organizational learning published in eight leading British- and US-based journals over the past 20 years. The results demonstrate substantial differences in data sources, data collection, and the scale of investigations. We discuss their impact on gaps in the study o f organizational learning and o f fer our own thoughts on possible solutions (as well as challenges) for bridging these gaps.",
    keywords = "organizational learning, research methods, UK, USA",
    author = "M. Easterby-Smith and S.X. Li and J. Bartunek",
    year = "2009",
    month = "9",
    doi = "10.1177/1350507609339682",
    language = "English",
    volume = "40",
    pages = "439--447",
    journal = "Management Learning",
    issn = "1350-5076",
    number = "4",

    }

    Research methods for organizational learning: the transatlantic gap. / Easterby-Smith, M.; Li, S.X.; Bartunek, J.

    In: Management Learning, Vol. 40, No. 4, 09.2009, p. 439-447.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Research methods for organizational learning: the transatlantic gap

    AU - Easterby-Smith, M.

    AU - Li, S.X.

    AU - Bartunek, J.

    PY - 2009/9

    Y1 - 2009/9

    N2 - Research design has a notable impact on the nature of management and organizational research, and there have been numerous mentions, largely anecdotal, of differences in research design between journals published in the UK and USA. This article describes a systematic study of these supposed differences through content-analysis of 295 articles about organizational learning published in eight leading British- and US-based journals over the past 20 years. The results demonstrate substantial differences in data sources, data collection, and the scale of investigations. We discuss their impact on gaps in the study o f organizational learning and o f fer our own thoughts on possible solutions (as well as challenges) for bridging these gaps.

    AB - Research design has a notable impact on the nature of management and organizational research, and there have been numerous mentions, largely anecdotal, of differences in research design between journals published in the UK and USA. This article describes a systematic study of these supposed differences through content-analysis of 295 articles about organizational learning published in eight leading British- and US-based journals over the past 20 years. The results demonstrate substantial differences in data sources, data collection, and the scale of investigations. We discuss their impact on gaps in the study o f organizational learning and o f fer our own thoughts on possible solutions (as well as challenges) for bridging these gaps.

    KW - organizational learning

    KW - research methods

    KW - UK

    KW - USA

    UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1350507609339682

    U2 - 10.1177/1350507609339682

    DO - 10.1177/1350507609339682

    M3 - Article

    VL - 40

    SP - 439

    EP - 447

    JO - Management Learning

    T2 - Management Learning

    JF - Management Learning

    SN - 1350-5076

    IS - 4

    ER -