(Re)positioning the new college performance evaluation in China

Luxi Zhang, David Sorrell, Paul Adams, Bob Adamson

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

In recent decades, the prevalence of neo-liberal discourses in education governance has promoted the trend of performance evaluation in higher education institutions around the world. In Chinese universities, the Double-First Class initiative necessitated the introduction of an effective academic output measurement system. The mainly quantitative, results-oriented nationwide college performance evaluation (CPE) became a requisite staff appraisal system in all state-owned Chinese universities from 2007. However, after more than a decade of implementing CPE, China is still facing challenges in its development. Some university teachers contend that the implementation of CPE lacks legitimacy or rationality. Based on a case study in a Chinese university with analysis of documents, email messages, and teacher and leader interviews, this paper draws upon positioning theory to understand the challenges and tensions that led to staff’s compliance and resistance to CPE. It finds that cross-national policy referencing is fraught with complexity, and suggests that local appropriation is important in ensuring that a policy is viable. The findings have implications for future effective implementation of CPE.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationAsian Voices in Higher Education
EditorsT Savelyeva, F Gao
PublisherSpringer
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 26 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

China
evaluation
performance
staff appraisal
university
rationality
education
legitimacy
university teacher
leader
governance
staff
discourse
lack
trend
teacher
interview

Keywords

  • performance evaluation
  • university governance
  • Chinese universities
  • positioning theory

Cite this

Zhang, L., Sorrell, D., Adams, P., & Adamson, B. (Accepted/In press). (Re)positioning the new college performance evaluation in China. In T. Savelyeva, & F. Gao (Eds.), Asian Voices in Higher Education Springer.
Zhang, Luxi ; Sorrell, David ; Adams, Paul ; Adamson, Bob . / (Re)positioning the new college performance evaluation in China. Asian Voices in Higher Education. editor / T Savelyeva ; F Gao. Springer, 2019.
@inbook{ea488306daca44adb1026988ede9a7e8,
title = "(Re)positioning the new college performance evaluation in China",
abstract = "In recent decades, the prevalence of neo-liberal discourses in education governance has promoted the trend of performance evaluation in higher education institutions around the world. In Chinese universities, the Double-First Class initiative necessitated the introduction of an effective academic output measurement system. The mainly quantitative, results-oriented nationwide college performance evaluation (CPE) became a requisite staff appraisal system in all state-owned Chinese universities from 2007. However, after more than a decade of implementing CPE, China is still facing challenges in its development. Some university teachers contend that the implementation of CPE lacks legitimacy or rationality. Based on a case study in a Chinese university with analysis of documents, email messages, and teacher and leader interviews, this paper draws upon positioning theory to understand the challenges and tensions that led to staff’s compliance and resistance to CPE. It finds that cross-national policy referencing is fraught with complexity, and suggests that local appropriation is important in ensuring that a policy is viable. The findings have implications for future effective implementation of CPE.",
keywords = "performance evaluation, university governance, Chinese universities, positioning theory",
author = "Luxi Zhang and David Sorrell and Paul Adams and Bob Adamson",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "26",
language = "English",
editor = "T Savelyeva and F Gao",
booktitle = "Asian Voices in Higher Education",
publisher = "Springer",

}

Zhang, L, Sorrell, D, Adams, P & Adamson, B 2019, (Re)positioning the new college performance evaluation in China. in T Savelyeva & F Gao (eds), Asian Voices in Higher Education. Springer.

(Re)positioning the new college performance evaluation in China. / Zhang, Luxi ; Sorrell, David ; Adams, Paul; Adamson, Bob .

Asian Voices in Higher Education. ed. / T Savelyeva; F Gao. Springer, 2019.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - (Re)positioning the new college performance evaluation in China

AU - Zhang, Luxi

AU - Sorrell, David

AU - Adams, Paul

AU - Adamson, Bob

PY - 2019/7/26

Y1 - 2019/7/26

N2 - In recent decades, the prevalence of neo-liberal discourses in education governance has promoted the trend of performance evaluation in higher education institutions around the world. In Chinese universities, the Double-First Class initiative necessitated the introduction of an effective academic output measurement system. The mainly quantitative, results-oriented nationwide college performance evaluation (CPE) became a requisite staff appraisal system in all state-owned Chinese universities from 2007. However, after more than a decade of implementing CPE, China is still facing challenges in its development. Some university teachers contend that the implementation of CPE lacks legitimacy or rationality. Based on a case study in a Chinese university with analysis of documents, email messages, and teacher and leader interviews, this paper draws upon positioning theory to understand the challenges and tensions that led to staff’s compliance and resistance to CPE. It finds that cross-national policy referencing is fraught with complexity, and suggests that local appropriation is important in ensuring that a policy is viable. The findings have implications for future effective implementation of CPE.

AB - In recent decades, the prevalence of neo-liberal discourses in education governance has promoted the trend of performance evaluation in higher education institutions around the world. In Chinese universities, the Double-First Class initiative necessitated the introduction of an effective academic output measurement system. The mainly quantitative, results-oriented nationwide college performance evaluation (CPE) became a requisite staff appraisal system in all state-owned Chinese universities from 2007. However, after more than a decade of implementing CPE, China is still facing challenges in its development. Some university teachers contend that the implementation of CPE lacks legitimacy or rationality. Based on a case study in a Chinese university with analysis of documents, email messages, and teacher and leader interviews, this paper draws upon positioning theory to understand the challenges and tensions that led to staff’s compliance and resistance to CPE. It finds that cross-national policy referencing is fraught with complexity, and suggests that local appropriation is important in ensuring that a policy is viable. The findings have implications for future effective implementation of CPE.

KW - performance evaluation

KW - university governance

KW - Chinese universities

KW - positioning theory

UR - https://www.springer.com/gb/

M3 - Chapter

BT - Asian Voices in Higher Education

A2 - Savelyeva, T

A2 - Gao, F

PB - Springer

ER -

Zhang L, Sorrell D, Adams P, Adamson B. (Re)positioning the new college performance evaluation in China. In Savelyeva T, Gao F, editors, Asian Voices in Higher Education. Springer. 2019